Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymph node evaluation for cervical cancer via pfannenstiel incision: Technique and peri-operative outcomes

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 466-471

  Moore, Kathleen N ^a   Gold, Michael A ^a   McMeekin, D Scott ^a   Walker, Joan L ^a   Rutledge, Teresa ^b   Zorn, Kristin K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Extraperitoneal lymph node; Technique

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CELLULITIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTIC LYMPHANGIOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAAORTIC LYMPH NODE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 39249085132     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.043     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., and Thun M.J. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J clin 57 (2007) 43-66
2. Morris M., Eifel P.J., Lu J., et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340 (1999) 1137
3. Whiney C.W., Sause W., Bundy B.N., et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 17 (1999) 1339
4. Rose P.G., Bundy B.N., Watkins E.B., et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340 (1999) 1144
5. Green J., Kirwan J., Tierney J., et al. Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 (2005) CD002225
6. Ballon S.C., Berman M.L., Lagasse L.D., Petrilli E.S., and Castaldo T.W. Survival after extraperitoneal pelvic and para aortic lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 57 (1981) 90-95
7. Averette H.E., Dudan R.C., and Ford J.H. Exploratory celiotomy for surgical staging of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 11 (1972) 1090-1096
8. Grigsby P.W., Heydon K., Mutch D.G., et al. Long term follow-up of RTOG 92-10: cervical cancer with positive para-aortic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 (2001) 982
9. Varia M.A., Bundy B.N., Deppe G., et al. Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42 (1998) 1015
10. Heller P.B., Malfetano J.H., Bundy B.N., Barnhill D.R., and Okagaki T. Clinical-pathologic study of stage IIB, III, and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: extended diagnostic evaluation for para aortic node metastasis - a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 38 (1990) 425-430
11. Scheidler J., Hricak H., Yu K.K., Subak L., and Segal M.R. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA 278 (1997) 1096-1101
12. Rose P.G., Adler L.P., Rodriguez M., et al. Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgicopathologic study. J Clin Oncol 171 (1999) 41-45
13. Park W., Park Y.J., Huh S.J., et al. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35 (2005) 260-264
14. Wong T.Z., Jones E.L., and Coleman R.E. Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose for evaluating local and distant disease in patients with cervical cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 6 (2004) 55-62
15. Kumar R., Chauhan A., Jana S., and Dadparvar S. Positron emission tomography in gynecological malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 6 7 (2006) 1033-1044
16. Berman M.L., Lagasse L.D., Watring W.G., et al. The operative evaluation of patients with cervical carcinoma by an extraperitoneal approach. Obstet Gynecol 50 6 (1977) 658-664
17. Cosin J.A., Fowler J.M., Chen M.D., Paley P.J., Carson L.F., and Twiggs L.B. Pretreatment surgical staging of patients with cervical carcinoma: the case for lymph node debulking. Cancer 82 (1998) 2241-2248
18. Goff B.A., Muntz H.G., Paley P.J., Tamimi H.K., Koh W.J., et al. Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 74 (1999) 436-442
19. Hacker N.F., Wain G.V., and Nicklin J.L. Resection of bulky positive lymph nodes in patients with cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 5 (1995) 250-256
20. Kim P.Y., Monk B.J., Chabra S., et al. Cervical cancer with para-aortic metastases: significance of residual para-aortic disease after surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 69 (1998) 243
21. Wharton J.T., Jones III H.W., Day Jr. T.G., Rutledge F.N., and Fletcher G.H. Preirradiation celiotomy and extended field irradiation for invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 49 (1977) 333-338
22. Fletcher G.H. Lucy Wortham James lecture: subclinical disease. Cancer 53 (1984) 1274-1284
23. Downey G.O., Potish R.A., Adcock L.L., Prem K.A., and Twiggs L.B. Pretreatment surgical staging in cervical carcinoma: therapeutic efficacy of pelvic lymph node resection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160 (1989) 1055-1061
24. Kinney WK Hodge D.O., Egorshin E.V., Ballard D.J., and Podratz K.C. Surgical treatment of patients with stages IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix and palpably positive pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 57 (1995) 145-149
25. Fine B.A., Hempling R.E., Piver M.S., Baker T.R., McAuley M., and Driscoll D. Severe radiation morbidity in carcinoma of the cervix: impact of pretherapy surgical staging and previous surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31 (1995) 717-723
26. Vigliotti A.P., Wen B.C., Hussey D.H., Doornbos J.F., Staples J.J., Jani S.K., et al. Extended field irradiation for carcinoma of the uterine cervix with positive periaortic nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23 (1992) 501-509
27. Kademian M.T., and Bosch A. Is staging laparotomy in cervical cancer justifiable?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2 (1972) 1235
28. Jolles C.J., Freedman R.S., Hamberger A.D., and Horbelt D.V. Complications of extended-field therapy for cervical carcinoma without prior surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12 (1986) 179-183
29. Kataoka M., Kawamura M., Yasuyuki N., Hamamoto K., Hamada K.I., Iketani H., et al. Patterns of failure and survival in locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with high dose-rate intracavitary irradiation system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 22 (1991) 31-35
30. Weiser E.B., Bundy B.N., Hoskins W.J., Heller P.B., Whittington R.R., DiSaia P.J., et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective para aortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). Gynecol Oncol 33 (1989) 283-289
31. Panici P.G., Plotti F., Zullo M.A., Muzii L., Manci N., et al. Pelvic lyphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: laparotomy extraperitoneal, transperitoneal or laparoscopic approach? A randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 103 (2006) 859-864
32. Leblac E., Narducci F., Frumovitz M., Lesoin A., et al. Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 105 (2007) 304-311
33. Sonoda Y., Leblac E., Querleu D., et al. Prospective evaluation of surgical staging of advanced cervical cancer via a laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach. Gynecol Oncol 9 2 (2003) 326-331