Patterns of genetic diversity within and between Myotis d. daubentonii and M. d. nathalinae derived from cytochrome b mtDNA sequence data

Acta Chiropterologica

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 379-389

  Simões, Bruno F ^a,b   Rebelo, Hugo ^a,c   Lopes, Ricardo J ^a   Alves, Paulo C ^a,b   Harris, D James ^a  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cytochrome b; Iberian Peninsula; M. d. daubentonii; M. d. nathalinae; Phylogeny; Phylogeography

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION STATUS; CYTOCHROME; DISPERSAL; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MORPHOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; IBERIAN PENINSULA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

MYOTIS;

EID: 39149135580     PISSN: 15081109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3161/1733-5329(2007)9[379:POGDWA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. AVISE, J. C. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, vii + 447 pp.
2. BAKER, R. J., and R. D. BRADLEY. 2006. Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy, 87: 643-662.
3. BALLARD, J. W. O., and M. C. WHITLOCK. 2004. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Molecular Ecology, 13: 729-744.
4. BARRATT, E. M., R. DEAVILLE, T. M. BURLAND, M. W. BRUFORD, G. JONES, and R. K. WAYNE. 1997. DNA answers the call of pipistelle bat species. Nature, 387: 138-139.
5. BOGDANOWICZ, W. 1990. Geographic variation and taxonomy of Daubenton's bat Myotis daubentoni, in Europe. Journal of Mammalogy, 71: 205-218.
6. BOGDANOWICZ, W., and A. M. WÓJCIK. 1986. Morphological and electrophoretic differentation between Myotis daubentoni (Kuhl, 1819) and Myotis nathalinae Tupiner, 1977. Myotis, 23-24: 17-30.
7. CLEMENT, M., D. POSADA, and K. A. CRANDALL. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology, 9: 1657-1660.
8. FELSENTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence-limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791.
9. GÓMEZ, A., and D. LUNT. 2007. Refugia within a refugia: paternes of phylogeographic concordance in the Iberian Peninsula. Pp 155-188, in Phylogeography of Southern European refugia (S. WEISS and N. FERRAND, eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 377 pp.
10. HALL, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis. [available at http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/ BioEdit/bioedit.html].
11. HARRIS, D. J., and P. SA-SOUSA. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of the Iberian wall lizards (Podarcis): Is Podarcis hispanica a species complex? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 23: 75-81.
12. HELVERSEN, O. v., K.-G. HELLER, F. MAYER, A. NEMETH, M. VOLLETH, and P. GOMBKÖTÖ. 2001. Cryptic mammalian species: a new species of whiskered bat (Myotis alcathoe n. sp.) in Europe. Naturwissenschaften, 88: 217-223.
13. HEWITT, G. M. 1999. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68: 87-112.
14. HEWITT, G. M. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature, 405: 907-913.
15. IBÁÑEZ, C., J. L. GARCÍA-MUNDARRA, M. RUEDI, B. STADELMANN , and J. JUSTE. 2006. The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats. Acta Chiropterologica, 8: 277-297.
16. IRWIN, D. M., T. D. KOCHER, and A. C. WILSON. 1991. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 32: 128-144.
17. JONES, G., and S. M. VAN PARIJS. 1993. Bimodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 251: 119-125.
18. KAWAI, K., M. NIKAIDO, M. HARADA, S. MATSUMURA, S. L.-K. LIN, Y. WU, M. HASEGAWA, and N. OKADA. 2003. The status of the Japanese and East Asian bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) based on mitochondrial sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 28: 297-307.
19. KAWAI, K., N. KONDO, N. SASAKI, D. FUKUI, H. DEWA, M. SATÔ , and Y. YAMAGA. 2006. Distinguishing between cryptic species Myotis ikonnikovi and M. brandtii gracilis in Hokkaido, Japan: evaluation of a novel diagnostic morphological feature using molecular methods. Acta Chiropterologica, 8: 95-102.
20. KIEFER, A., F. MAYER, J. KOSUCH, O. v. HELVERSEN, and M. VEITH . 2002. Conflicting molecular phylogenies of European long-eared bats (Plecotus) can be explained by cryptic diversity. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 25: 557-566.
21. KOCHER, T. D., W. K. THOMAS, A. MEYER, S. V. EDWARDS, S. PÄÄBO, F. X. VILLABLANCA, and A. C. WILSON. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA, 86: 6196-6200.
22. MAYER, F., C. DIETZ, and A. KIEFER. 2007. Molecular species identification boosts bats diversity. Frontiers in Zoology, 4(4). [available at http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/pdf/ 1742-9994-4-4.pdf].
23. MATVEEV, V. A., S. V. KRUSKOP, and D. A. KRAMEROV. 2005. Revalidation of Myotis petax Hollister, 1912 and its new status in connection with M. daubentonii (Kuhl, 1817) (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera). Acta Chiropterologica, 7: 23-37.
24. MARTÍNEZ-SOLANO, I., J. TEIXEIRA, D. BUCKLEY, and M. GARCIA-PARÍS. 2006. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of Lissotriton boscai (Caudata, Salamandridae): evidence for old, multiple refugia in an Iberian endemic. Molecular Ecology, 15: 3375-3388.
25. MILLER, S. A., D. D. DYKES, and H. F. POLESKY, 1988. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Research, 16: 1215.
26. MITCHELL-JONES, A. J., G. AMORI, W. BOGDANOWICZ, B. KRYŠTUFEK, P. J. H. REIJNDERS, F. SPITZENBERGER, M. STUBBE, J. B. M. THISSEN, V. VOHRALÍK, and J. ZIMA. 1999. The atlas of European mammals. Academic Press, London, xi + 404 pp.
27. MUCEDDA, M., A. KIEFER, E. PIDINCHEDDA, and M. VEITH. 2002. A new species of long-eared bat (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Sardinia (Italy). Acta Chiropterologica, 4: 121-135.
28. MYERS, N., R. A. MITTERMEIER, C. G. MITTERMEIER, G. A. FONSECA, and J. KENT. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858.
29. PETIT, R. J., I. AGUINAGALDE, J.-L. BEAULIEU, C. BITTKAU, S. BREWER, R. CHEDDADI, R. ENNOS, S. FINESCHI, D. GRIVET, M. LASCOUX, A. MOHANTY, G. MÜLLER-STARCK, B. DEMESURE-MUSCH, A. PALMÉ, J. MARTÍN, S. RENDELL, and G. VENDRAMIN. 2003. Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science, 300: 1563-1565.
30. POLLY, P. D. 2001. On morphological clocks and paleophylogeography: towards a timescale for Sorex hybrid zones. Genetica, 112-113: 339-357.
31. POSADA, D., and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818.
32. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
33. RODRIGUEZ, R. M., and L. K. AMMERMAN. 2004. Mitochondrial DNA divergence does not reflect morphological difference between Myotis californicus and Myotis ciliolabrum. Journal of Mammalogy, 85: 842-851.
34. RONQUIST, F., and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572-1574.
35. Royo, L. J., G. PAJARES, I. ALVAREZ, I. FERNÁNDEZ, and F. GOYACHE. 2007. Genetic variability and differentiation in Spanish roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a phylogeographic reassessment within the European framework. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 42: 47-61.
36. RUEDI, M., and F. MAYER. 2001. Molecular systematics of bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) suggests deterministic ecomorphological convergences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 21: 436-448.
37. SALGUEIRO, P., M. RUEDI, M. M. COELHO, and J. M. PALMEIRIM , 2007. Genetic divergence and phylogeography in the genus Nyctalus (Mammalia, Chiroptera): implications for population history of the insular bat Nyctalus azoreum. Genetica, 130: 169-181.
38. SMITH, M. F., and J. L. PATTON. 1993. The diversification of South American murid rodents: Evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequence data for the akodontine tribe. Biological Journal Linnean Society, 50: 149-177.
39. SPITZENBERGER, F., P. P. STRELKOV, and E. HARING, 2003. Morphology and mitochondrial DNA sequences show that Plecotus alpinus Kiefer & Veith, 2002 and Plecotus microdontus Spitzenberger, 2002 are synonymus of Plecolus macrobullaris Kuzjakin, 1965. Natura Croatica, 12: 39-53.
40. STADELMANN, B., L. G. HERRERA, J. ARROYO-CABRALES, J. J. FLORES-MARTÍNEZ, B. P. MAY, and M. RUEDI. 2004. Molecular Systematics of the fishing bat Myotis (Pizonyx) vivesi. Journal of Mammalogy, 85: 133-139.
41. STADELMANN, B., L-K., LIN, T. H. KUNZ, and M. RUEDI. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of New World Myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43: 32-48.
42. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP* 4.0. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Beta version 4.0b4a. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Suderland, Massachusetts.
43. TABERLET, P., and R. CHEDDADI. 2002. Quaternary refugia and persistence of biodiversity. Science, 297: 209-211.
44. TUPINIER, Y. 1977. Description d'une chauve-souris nouvelle: Myotis nathalinae nov. sp. (Chiroptera - Vespertilionidae). Mammalia, 41: 327-340.
45. URBAŃCZYK, Z. 1991. Rezerwat Nietoperek. Przyroda Ziemi Lubuskiej. Lubuski Klub Przyrodników, Świebodzin, 25 pp.
46. WAN, Q.-H., H. WU, T. FUJIHARA, and S.-G. FANG. 2004. Which genetic marker for which conservation genetics issue? Electrophoresis, 25: 2165-2176.
47. WARREN, R. D., D. A. WATERS, J. D. ALTRINGRAM, and D. J. BULLOCK. 2000. The distribution of Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii) and pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) (Vespertilionidae) in relation to small-scale variation in riverine habitat. Biological Conservation, 92: 85-91.
48. WORTHINGTON-WILMER, J., and E. BARRATT. 1996. A non-lethal method of tissue sampling for genetic studies of chiropterans. Bat Research News, 37: 1-3.