Evaluation of the automatic three-dimensional delineation of caudate and putamen for PET receptor occupancy studies

Nuclear Medicine Communications

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-65

  Wallius, Esa ^a   Tohka, Jussi ^a   Hirvonen, Jussi ^a   Hietala, Jarmo ^b   Ruotsalainen, Ulla ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Automatic segmentation; Receptor imaging; Receptor occupancy; Striatum

Indexed keywords

FLUORINE 18; RACLOPRIDE C 11; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR; NEUROKININ 1 RECEPTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PUTAMEN; RECEPTOR OCCUPANCY; SYNAPTIC MEMBRANE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ADULT; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PUTAMEN; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D2; RECEPTORS, NEUROKININ-1; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 39149128759     PISSN: 01433636     EISSN: 14735628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f1bba0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Passchier J, Gee A, Willemsen A, Vaalburg W, van Waarde A. Measuring drug-related receptor occupancy with positron emission tomography. Methods 2002; 27:278-286.
2. Laruelle M. Imaging synaptic neurotransmission with in vivo binding competition techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20:423-451.
3. Farde L. The advantage of using positron emission tomography in drug research. Trends Neurosci 1996; 19:211-214.
4. Bergström M, Hargreaves RJ, Burns HD, Goldberg MR, Sciberras D, Reines SA, et al. Human positron emission tomography studies of brain neurokinin 1 receptor occupancy by aprepipant. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 55:1007-1012.
5. 11C-raclopride. Nucl Med Commun 2003; 24:1207-1214.
6. 11C]raclopride PET using deformable surface models and normalized cuts. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006; 53:220-227.
7. Reilhac A, Lartizien C, Costes N, Sans S, Comtat C, Gunn R, Evans A, et al. PET-SORTEO: A Monte Carlo based simulator with high count rate capabilities. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2004; 51:46-52.
8. Zubal I, Harrell C, Smith E, Rattner Z, Gindi G, Hoffer P. Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys 1994; 21:299-302.
9. 1) receptors in the human brain. Mol Imaging Biol 2005; 7:262-272.
10. Lammertsma A, Hume S. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage 1996; 4:153-158.
11. Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Hume SP, Cunningham VJ. Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. Neuroimage 1997; 6:279-287.
12. Mykkänen J, Tohka J, Luoma J, Ruotsalainen U. Automatic extraction of brain surface and mid-sagittal plane from PET images applying deformable models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2005; 79:1-17.
13. Tohka J, Mykkänen J. Deformable mesh for automated surface extraction from noisy images. Int J Image and Graphics 2004; 4:405-432.
14. Shi J, Malik J. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 2000; 22:888-905.
15. SPM2, . [Accessed 22 December 2006].
16. Studholme C, Hawkes DJ, Hill DL. Normalized entropy measure for multimodality image alignment. Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing 1998; 3338:132-143.
17. Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intra-class correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86:420-428.
18. 11C]WAY-100635 in humans: comparison of arterial and reference tissue input functions. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20:1111-1133.
19. Laruelle M. Modelling: when and why? Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26:571-572.
20. Hripcsak G, Heitjan D. Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. J Biomed Inform 2002; 35:99-110.
21. Frouin V, Comtat C, Reilhac A, Gregoire M-C. Correction of partial volume effect for PET striatal imaging: fast implementation and study of robustness. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:1715-1726.
22. Shen D, Herskovits E, Davatzikos C. An adaptive focus statistical shape model for segmentation and shape modeling of 3D brain structures. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20:257-270.
23. Fischl B, Salat D, Busa E, Albert M, Dietrich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: Automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the brain. Neuron 2002; 33:341-355.
24. Heckemann RA, Hajnal JV, Aljabar P, Rueckert D, Hammers A. Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage 2006; 33:115-126.
25. Svarer C, Madsen K, Hasselbalch SG, Pinborg LH, Haugbøl S, Frøkjær VG, et al. MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET. Neuroimage 2005; 24:969-979.
26. British Standards Institution. Precision of test methods I: Guide for the determination and reproducibility for a standard test method. British Standard 5497, 1979.