Effect of flue-gas cleaning devices on mercury emission from coal-fired boiler

Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 72-76

  Chen, Jin Sheng ^a   Yuan, Dong Xing ^a   Li, Quan Long ^a   Zheng, Jian Ming ^b   Zhu, Yan Qun ^b   Hua, Xiao Yu ^b   He, Sheng ^b   Zhou, Jin Song ^b  

^a XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Coal fired flue gas; Emission; Mercury

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; COAL FIRED BOILERS; FLY ASH; POLLUTION CONTROL; POWER PLANTS; REMOVAL; SEAWATER; SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION;

EMISSION; FLUE GAS; MERCURY; ONTARIO-HYDRO METHOD;

CLEANING;

EID: 39149125458     PISSN: 02588013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. EPA. RIN 20602AJ65205 Standards of performance for new and existing stationary sources: Eleclric utility steam generating units [S]. Washington DC: EPA, 2005.
2. EPA. RIN 20602AL76203 Rule to reduce interstate transport of fine particulate matter and ozone [S]. Washington DC: EPA. 2004.
3. Quick J C, Brill T C, Tabet D E. Mercury in US coal: Observations using the COALQUAL and ICR data [J]. Environmental Geology, 2003, 43 (3): 247-259.
4. Belkin H E, Fmkelman R B. Zheng B. Mercury in People's Republic of China coal [J]. The Geological Society of America Abstract. 2005.
5. Pavlish J H, Sondreal E A, Mann M D, et al. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 82 (2-3): 89-165.
6. Senior C L. Oxidation of mercury across SCR catalysts in coal-fired power plants [J]. Journal of The Air and Waste Management Association. 2006, 56 (1): 23-31.
7. Guo Xin. Zheng Chuguang, Jia Xiaohong, et al. Study on mercury speciation in pulverized coal fired flue gas [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2004, 24 (6): 185-188 (in Chinese).
8. Chen Lei, Duan Yufeng, Zhuo Yuqun, et al. Mercury transformation across particulate control devices in six power plants of China: The co-effect of chlorine and ash com position [J]. Fuel, 2007, 86 (4): 603-610.
9. EPA. ASTMD6784202 Standard test method for elemental, oxidized, particle-bound, and total mercury in flue gas generated from coal-fired stationary sources (Ontario-Hydro method) [S]. Washington DC: EPA, 1999.
10. Chen Jinsheng. The technology and character analysis for flue gas denitrification SCR system [J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2006, 22 (6): 40-43 (in Chinese).
11. Chen Jinsheng. Efficiency improvement retrofit for ESP of 300 MW units [J]. Energy Environmental Protection. 2006. 20 (6): 42-44, 49 (in Chinese).
12. Chen Jinsheng. Analysis of the seawater FGD process and characteristics [J]. Electric Power Environmental Protection, 2007. 23 (2): 31-34 (in Chinese).
13. Method 1 through 5, Code of Federal Regulation, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A [S]. Washington DC: EPA, 1991.
14. Zhou Jinsong, Wang Guangkai, Luo Zhongyang, et al. An experimental study of mercury emissions from a 600 MW pulverized coal-fired boiler [J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power. 2006. 21 (6): 569-572 (in Chinese).
15. Takahisa Yokoyama, Kazuo Asakura, Hiromitsu Matsuda, et al. Mercury emissions from a coal-fired power plant in Japan [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2000, 259 (1-3): 97-103.
16. Benson S A, Laumb J D, Crocker C R, Pavlish J H. SCR catalyst performance in flue gases derived from subbituminous and lignite coals [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, 86 (5): 577-613.
17. Eswaran S, Stenger H G. Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts [J]. Energy and Fuels, 2005, 19 (6): 2328-2334.
18. Galbreath K C, Zygarlicke C J, Olson E S, et al. Evaluating mercury transformation mechanisms in a laboratory scale combustion system [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2000, 261 (1-3): 149-155.
19. Yang Hongmin, Pan Weiping. Tansformation of mercury speciation through the SCR system in power plants [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 191 (2): 181-184.