VIPER-2: A prospective, randomized single-center comparison of 2 different closure devices with a hemostatic wound dressing for closure of femoral artery access sites

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 83-90

  Rastan, Aljoscha ^a   Sixt, Sebastian ^a   Schwarzwälder, Uwe ^a   Schwarz, Thomas ^a   Frank, Ulrich ^a   Bürgelin, Karlheinz ^a   Pochert, Volker ^a   Noory, Elias ^a   Amantea, Pietro ^a   Gremmelmaier, Daniel ^a   Müller, Christian ^b   Büttner, Heinz Joachim ^a   Neumann, Franz Josef ^a   Zeller, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER FREIBURG BAD KROZINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Complication; Femoral artery; Puncture site; Vascular access; Vascular closure device

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEATH; DEVICE; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTASIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUNCTURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR SURGERY; WOUND DRESSING;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BANDAGES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 39149123192     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/07-2253.1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A, et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1200-1209.
2. Muller DW, Shamir KJ, Ellis SG, et al. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69: 63-68.
3. Stiebellehner L, Nikfardjan M, Diem K, et al. Manual compression versus mechanical compression device (FemoStop) after diagnostic coronary angiography with/without intervention [in German]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002;114:847-852.
4. Chevalier B, Lancelin B, Koning R, et al. Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;58:285-291.
5. Cura FA, Kapadia SR, L'Allier PL, et al. Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:780-782.
6. Assali AR, Sdringola S, Moustapha A, et al. Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the era of closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;58:1-5.
7. Thore V, Berder V, Houplon P, et al. Role of manual compression time and bed rest duration on the occurrence of femoral bleeding complications after sheath retrieval following 4Fr left-sided cardiac catheterization. J Interv Cardiol. 2001;14:7-10.
8. Simon A, Bumgarner B, Clark K, et al. Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:308-313.
9. Akopian G, Katz SG. Peripheral angioplasty with same-day discharge in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:115-118.
10. Rickli H, Unterweger M, Sutsch G, et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;57:297-302.
11. Wetter DR, Rickli H, von Smekal A, et al. Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1033-1037.
12. Kornowski R, Brandes S, Teplitsky I, et al. Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial suturing device following percutaneous coronary interventions: a pilot evaluation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002;14:741-745.
13. Meyerson SL, Feldman T, Desai TR, et al. Angiographic access site complications in the era of arterial closure devices. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2002;36:137-144.
14. Lewis-Carey MB, Kee ST. Complications of arterial closure devices. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;6:103-106.
15. Wagner SC, Gonsalves CF, Eschelman DJ, et al. Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:735-741.
16. Tron C, Koning R, Eltchaninoff H, et al. A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA. J Interv Cardiol. 2003;16:217-221.
17. Applegate RJ, Grabarczyk MA, Little WC, et al. Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:78-83.
18. Michalis LK, Rees MR, Patsouras D, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of three commercially available closure devices (Angioseal, Vasoseal and Duett). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:423-429.
19. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:638-641.
20. Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, et al. Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:3-7.
21. Tavris DR, Gallauresi BA, Lin B, et al. Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use and gender. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:459-464.
22. Hermiller J, Simonton C, Hinohara T, et al. Clinical experience with a circumferential clip-based vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17:504-510.
23. Hermiller JB, Simonton C, Hinohara T, et al. The StarClose Vascular Closure System: interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:677-683.
24. Desideri A, Tonello D, Coscarelli S, et al. Early mobilization after percutaneous catheterization and vascular closure with a novel device (StarClose). Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1408-1409.
25. Ratnam LA, Raja J, Munneke GJ, et al. Prospective nonrandomized trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and StarClose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:182-188.
26. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, et al. Propensity score analysis of vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention using thrombin hemostatic patch-facilitated manual compression. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007;19: 164-170.
27. Abando A, Hood D, Weaver F, et al. The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:287-290.
28. Wille J, Vos JA, Overtoom TT, et al. Acute leg ischemia: the dark side of a percutaneous femoral artery closure device. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:278-281.
29. Kirchhof C, Schickel S, Schmidt-Lucke C, et al. Local vascular complications after use of the hemostatic puncture closure device AngioSeal. Vasa. 2002;31:101-106.
30. Eggebrecht H, von Birgelen C, Naber C, et al. Impact of gender on femoral access complications secondary to application of a collagen based vascular closure device. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:247-250.
31. Tavris DR, Dey S, Albrecht-Gallauresi B, et al. Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use - phase II. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17: 644-650.
32. Tavris DR, Gallauresi BA, Dey S, et al. Risk of local adverse events by gender following cardiac catheterization. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:125-131.