Inverse modeling of surface-water discharge to achieve restoration salinity performance measures in Florida Bay, Florida

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 351, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 188-202

  Swain, Eric D ^a   James, Dawn E ^b  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b MWH AMERICAS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Coastal hydrology; Ecologic restoration; Everglades; Numerical modeling; Optimization

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW OF WATER; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; RESTORATION; SALINITY MEASUREMENT; SURFACE WATERS; WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

COASTAL HYDROLOGY; ECOLOGIC RESTORATION; EVERGLADES;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS);

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); FLOW OF WATER; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; RESTORATION; SALINITY MEASUREMENT; SURFACE WATERS; WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

COASTAL ZONE; DISCHARGE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SALINITY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TRANSPORT PROCESS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; FLORIDA BAY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 39149122480     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.12.017     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahlfeld D.P., and Riefler G. Documentation for MODOFC: A Program for Solving Optimal Flow Control Problems Based on MODFLOW Simulation (2003), University of Massachusetts, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amherst
2. Coiacetto E. A model for use in the management of coastal wetlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 36 1 (1996) 27-47
3. Cole, C.R., Bergeron, M.P., Wurstner, S.K., Thorne, P.D., Orr, S., McKinley, M.I., 2001. Transient Inverse Calibration of Hanford Site-Wide Groundwater Model to Hanford Operational Impact - 1943 to 1996. US Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830, 226p.
4. Culver T.B., and Shoemaker C.A. Dynamic optimal control for groundwater remediation with flexible management periods. Water Resources Research 28 3 (1992) 629-641
5. DeAngelis D.L., and Curnutt J.L. Integration of population, community, and landscape indicators for assessing effects of stressors. In: Marshall Adams S. (Ed). Biological Indicators of Stress in Fish. second ed. (2002), American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland 509-532
6. Dougherty D.E., and Marryott R.A. Optimal groundwater management, 1. Simulated annealing. Water Resources Research 27 10 (1991) 2493-2508
7. Dripps, W.R., Hunt, R.J., Anderson, M.P., 2002. Use of an analytic element model (GFLOW) coupled to a parameter-estimation model (UCODE) to estimate annual groundwater recharge rates in Northern Wisconsin. In: Proceedings of the 2002 GSA Annual Meeting, October 27-30, Denver, CO.
8. Eckhardt K., Breuer L., and Frede H.-G. Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects. Journal of Hydrology 273 (2002) 164-176
9. Finno, R.J., Calvello, Michele, Bryson, S.L., 2002, Analysis and Performance of the Excavation for the Chicago-State Subway Renovation Project and its Effects on Adjacent Structures, Chapter 6, Deep Excavations: The Observational Method and Inverse Analysis. Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University Report Nos. A428 and A435.
10. Freeze R.A., and Gorelick S.M. Convergence of stochastic optimization and decision analysis in the engineering design of aquifer remediation. Ground Water 37 6 (1999) 934-954
11. Guo, Weixing, Langevin, C.D., 2002. User's Guide to SEAWAT: A Computer Program for Simulation of Three-Dimensional Variable-Density Ground-Water Flow. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A7, 77p.
12. Holtschlag, D.J., Koschik, J.A., 2001. A Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model of the St. Clair-Detroit River Waterway in the Great Lakes Basin. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4236, 61p.
13. Hunt, R.J., Steuer, J.J., 2000. Simulation of the Recharge Area for Frederick Springs, Dane County, Wisconsin. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4172, 38p.
14. Langevin, C.D., Swain, E.D., Wolfert, M.A., 2004. Simulation of Integrated Surface-Water/Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for a Coastal Wetland and Adjacent Marine Estuary. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 04-1097.
15. Langevin C.D., Swain E.D., and Wolfert M.A. Simulation of integrated surface-water/ground-water flow and salinity for a coastal wetland and adjacent estuary. Journal of Hydrology 314 (2005) 212-234
16. Minsker B.S., and Shoemaker C.A. Quantifying the effects of uncertainty on optimal groundwater bioremediation policies. Water Resources Research 34 12 (1998) 3615-3625
17. Newbold S.C. Integrated modeling for watershed management: multiple objectives and spatial effects. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 2 (2002) 341-353
18. Nuttle, W.K., 1995. Dynamics of Ground-Water, Surface-Water, and Salinity Related to the Mangrove/Marsh Ecotone: Assembled Historic Data Sets. Report prepared for Global Climate Change Research Program, South Florida Biogeographic Region.
19. Poeter, E.P., Hill, M.C., 1998. Documentation of UCODE: A Computer Code for Universal Inverse Modeling. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4080, 116p.
20. Poeter, E.P., Hill, M.C., Banta, E.R., 2005, UCODE_2005 and Six Other Computer Codes for Universal Sensitivity Analysis, Calibration, and Uncertainty Evaluation. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A11.
21. Roman C.T., Garvine R.W., and Portnoy J.W. Hydrologic modeling as a predictive basis for ecological restoration of salt marshes. Environmental Management 19 (1995) 559-566
22. Schaffranek, R.W., 2004, A Model for Simulation of Surface-Water Integrated Flow and Transport in Two Dimensions: SWIFT2D User's Manual: Techniques and Methods of the US Geological Survey, Book 6, Section B, Chapter 1.
23. Swain, E.D., Wolfert, M.A., Bales, J.D., Goodwin, C.R., 2004, Two-dimensional Hydrodynamic Simulation of Surface-Water Flow and Transport to Florida Bay through the Southern Inland and Coastal Systems (SICS). US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4287, 56p., 6 plates.
24. Tiedeman C., and Gorelick S.M. Analysis of uncertainty in optimal groundwater contaminant capture design. Water Resources Research 29 7 (1993) 2139-2154
25. Traxler, S., Hughes, E., Schmidt, T., Burzycki, G., Pitts, P., Sneckenberger, S., Buckingham, C., Ramos-Gines, O., Brown E., 2004. Florida Bay/Florida Keys Feasibility Study (FBFKFS) Recover Evaluation of Project-Level Performance Measures: Report prepared by the FBFKFS Regional Evaluation Team (RET) and Water Quality Team (WQT).
26. US Congress, 2000. Water Resources Development Act of 2000: Public Law 106-541, 106th Congress, 142p.
27. Wang M., and Zheng C. Application of genetic algorithms and simulated annealing in groundwater management: formulation and comparison. Journal of American Water Resources Association 34 3 (1998) 519-530
28. Worth, Dewey, Trulock, Shelley, 2002, Florida Bay and Florida Keys Feasibility Study: Presentation to the Florida Bay Florida Keys Feasibility Study/Florida Keys Tidal Restoration Public Workshop, October 28-29. Accessed on 10/6/06 at: .
29. Zhang Z.F., Ward A.L., and Gee G.W. Estimating soil hydraulic parameters of a field drainage experiment using inverse techniques. Vadose Zone Journal 2 (2003) 201-211
30. Zheng C., and Wang P.P. MGO - Modular Groundwater Optimizer, Documentation and User's Guide (2001), Groundwater Systems Research Ltd., University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
31. Zheng C., and Wang P.P. A field demonstration of the simulation-optimization approach for remediation system design. Ground Water 40 3 (2002) 258-265