Single-center experience with the talent LPS endograft in patients with at least 5 years of follow-up

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-32

  Coppi, Gioacchino ^a   Silingardi, Roberto ^a   Saitta, Giuseppe ^a   Gennai, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Complications; Endoleak; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Long term outcome; Migration; Mortality; Stent graft

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; MALE; MORTALITY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 39149108156     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/07-2157.1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843-848.
2. Prinssen M, Buskens E. Blankensteijn JD on behalf of the DREAM trial participants, Quality of life after endovascular and open AAA repair. Results of a randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:121-127.
3. EVAR Trial Participants. Secondary interventions and mortality following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: device-specific results from the UK EVAR trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34:281-290.
4. Laheij RJ, Buth J, Harris PL, et al. Need for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR). Br J Surg. 2000;87:1666-1673.
5. Biebl M, Hakaim AG, Oldenburg WA, et al. Midterm results of a single-center experience with commercially available devices for endovascular aneurysm repair. Mt Sinai J Med. 2005;72:127-135.
6. Zarins CK, White RA, Schwarten D, et al. AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:292-308.
7. Haider SE, Najjar SF, Cho JS, et al. Sac behavior after aneurysm treatment with the Gore Excluder low-permeability aortic endoprosthesis: 12-month comparison to the original Excluder device. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:694-700.
8. Rumball-Smith A, Wright IA, Buckenham TM. Strut failure in the body of the Zenith abdominal endoprosthesis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:136-139.
9. Bertges DJ, Chow K, Wyers MC, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm size regression after endovascular repair is endograft dependent. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:716-723.
10. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Greenberg RK, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: device-specific outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:991-998.
11. Sheehan MK, Ouriel K, Greenberg R, et al. Are type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair endograft dependent? J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:657-661.
12. Tonnessen BH, Sternbergh WC, Money SR. Mid- and long-term device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison of AneuRx and Zenith endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:392-401.
13. Torsello G, Osada N, Florek HJ, et al. Long-term outcome after Talent endograft implantation for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: a multicenter retrospective study. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:277-284.
14. Ohki T, Veith FJ, Shaw P, et al. Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg. 2001;234:323-335.
15. Alric P, Hinchliffe RJ, MacSweeney ST, et al. The Zenith aortic stent-graft: a 5-year single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:719-728.
16. Faries PL, Brener BJ, Connelly TL, et al. A multicenter experience with the Talent endovascular graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1123-1128.
17. May J, White GH, Waugh R, et al. Comparison of first- and second-generation prostheses for endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 6-year study with life table analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:124-129.
18. Cowie AG, Ashleigh RJ, England RE, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair with the Talent stent-graft. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:1011-1016.
19. Peppelenbosch N, Geelkerken RH, Soong C, et al. Endograft treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm using the Talent aortouniiliac system: an international multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1111-1122.
20. Seriki DM, Ashleigh RJ, Butterfield JS, et al. Follow-up of a single-center experience of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with use of the Talent stent-graft. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:973-977.
21. Haussegger KA, Mendel H, Tiesenhausen K, et al. Endoluminal treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: clinical experience with the Talent stent-graft system. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:267-274.
22. Criado FJ, Fairman RM, Becker GJ. Talent LPS AAA stent graft: results of a pivotal clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:709-715.
23. Criado FJ, Fry PD, Machan LS, et al. The Talent endoluminal AAA stent-graft system. Report on the phase I ISA trial, and summary of world-wide experience. J Mal Vasc. 1998;23:371-373.
24. Criado FJ, Wilson EP, Fairman RM, et al. Update on the Talent aortic stent-graft: a preliminary report from United States phase I and II trials. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S146-149.
25. Fairman RM, Velazquez OC, Carpenter JP, et al. Midterm pivotal trial results of the Talent Low Profile System for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of complicated versus uncomplicated aortic necks. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:1074-1082.
26. Prinssen M, Wever JJ, Mali WP, et al. Concerns for the durability of the proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft fixation from a 2-year and 3-year longitudinal computed tomography angiography study. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S64-69.
27. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2187-2192.
28. May J, White GH, Harris JP. Devices for aortic aneurysm repair. Surg Clin North Am. 1999;79:507-527.
29. Cao P, Verzini F, Parlani G, et al. Predictive factors and clinical consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable stent-grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:1200-1205.
30. Liapis C, Kakisis J, Kaperonis E. Changes of the infrarenal aortic segment after conventional abdominal aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:643-647.
31. Resch T, Ivancev J, Brunkwall J, et al. Midterm changes in aortic aneurysm morphology after endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2000;7:279-285.
32. White RA, Donayre CE, Walot I, et al. Computed tomography assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology after endograft exclusion. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S1-10.
33. Makaroun MS, Deaton DH. Is proximal aortic neck dilatation after endovascular aneurysm exclusion a cause for concern? J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S39-45.