Undertaking an art survey to compare patient versus student art preferences

Environment and Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 269-301

  Nanda, Upali ^a   Eisen, Sarajane L ^b   Baladandayuthapani, Veerabhadran ^c  

^a American Art Resources   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Art preferences; Health care art; Nature; Patients; Students; Visual art

Indexed keywords

ART; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITAL SECTOR; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; STUDENT;

EID: 39149102901     PISSN: 00139165     EISSN: 1552390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013916507311552     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
2. Bower, G.H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychology, 36, 129-148.
3. Carpman, J.R., & Grant, M.A. (1993). Design that cares: Planning health facilities for patients and visitors. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing.
4. Coss, R. (1990). Picture perception and patient stress: A study of anxiety reduction and postoperative stability. Unpublished paper, University of California at Davis.
5. Diette, G.B., Lechtzin, N., Haponik, E., Devrotes, A., & Rubin, H.R. (2003). Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy: A complementary approach to routine analgesia. Chest, 123, 941-948.
6. Evans, G.W., & Cohen, S. (1987). Environmental stress. In D. Stokels & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 571-670). New York: Wiley.
7. Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G.W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
8. Hathorn, K., & Ulrich, R.S. (2001, December 5). The therapeutic art program of North Western Memorial Hospital. Paper presented at the Symposium on Healthcare Design, Center for Health Design, Nashville, TN.
9. Heerwagen, J., & Orians, G.H. (1990). The psychological aspects of windows and window design. In K. H. Anthony, J. Choi, & B. Orland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 269-280), Oklahoma City.
10. Hekkert, P. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389-407.
11. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R.L. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
13. Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J.F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 163-203). New York: Plenum Press.
14. Miller, A.C., Hickman, L.C., & Lemasters, G.K. (1992). A distraction technique for control of burn pain. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, 13, 576-580.
15. Nightingale, F. (1969). Notes on nursing. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1860)
16. Orians, G.H. (1986). An ecological and evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. In E. C. Penning-Roswell & D. Lowenthal (Eds.), Meanings and values in landscape (pp. 3-25). London: Allen & Unwin.
17. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
18. Schneider, S.M., Ellis, M., Coombs, W.T., Shonkwiler, E.L., & Folsom, L.C. (2003). Virtual reality intervention for older women with breast cancer. Cyberpsychology Behavior, 6, 301-317.
19. Tse, M.M., Ng, J.K., Chung, J.W., & Wong, T.K. (2002). The effect of visual stimuli on pain threshold and tolerance. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11, 462-469.
20. Ulrich, R.S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment & Behavior, 13, 523-556.
21. Ulrich, R.S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.
22. Ulrich, R.S. (1992). How design impacts wellness. Healthcare Forum Journal, 30, 20-25.
23. Ulrich, R.S. (1999). Effects of gardens on health outcomes: Theory and research. In C. C. Marcus & M. Barnes (Eds.), Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations (pp. 27-86) New York: Wiley.
24. Ulrich, R.S., & Gilpin, L. (2003). Healing arts: Nutrition for the soul. In S. B. Frampton, L. Gilpin, & P. A. Charmel (Eds.), Putting patients first: Designing and practicing patient-centered care (pp. 117 - 146). San Francisco: Wiley.
25. Ulrich, R.S., Lunden, O., & Eltinge, J. (1993). Effects of exposure to nature and abstract pictures in patients recovering from heart surgery. Paper presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Rottach-Egern, Germany.
26. Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.V., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to nature and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
27. Wilson, E.O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Winston, A.S., & Cupchik, G.C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art preferences by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1-14.
29. Wypijewski, J. (Ed.). (1997). Painting by the numbers: Komar and Melamid's scientific guide to art. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.