Objective and subjective hearing aid assessment outcomes

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 118-129

  Mendel, Lisa Lucks ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Hearing aids; Outcomes; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; SELF EVALUATION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 39149101418     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2007/016)     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1996). Specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: Author.
2. Bilger, R. C., Nuetzel, J. M., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 32-48.
3. Carhart, R. (1946). Speech reception in relation to pure tone loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 97-108.
4. Carhart, R. (1965). Problems in the measurement of speech discrimination. Archives of Otolaryngology, 82, 253-260.
5. Cox, R. (1999). Measuring hearing aid outcomes: Part 1. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, Editorial.
6. Cox, R., & Alexander, G. C. (1995). The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear and Hearing, 16, 176-183.
7. Cox, R., Alexander, G. C., & Gilmore, C. (1987). Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear and Hearing, 8, 119S-126S.
8. Cox, R., Alexander, G. C., & Gilmore, C. (1991). Objective and self-report measures of hearing aid benefit. In G. A. Studebaker, F. H. Bess, & L. B. Beck (Eds.), The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report II (pp. 201-213). Parkton, MD: York Press.
9. Demorest, M., & Erdman, S. (1986). Scale composition and item analysis for the communication profile of hearing aid benefit. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 515-535.
10. Dillon, H., James, A., & Ginis, J. (1997). Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8, 27-43.
11. Etymotic Research. (2001). QuickSIN: Speech-in-Noise Test (Version 1.3). Elk Grove Village, IL: Author.
12. Fikret-Pasa, S. (1993). The effects of compression ratio on speech intelligibility and quality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Chicago.
13. House Ear Institute. (2001). HINT for Windows instrumentation manual - Version 6. Eden Prairie, MN: Maico Diagnostics.
14. Killion, M. C., Niquette, P. A., Gudmundsen, G. I., Revit, L. J., & Banerjee, S. (2004). Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2395-2405.
15. Martin, F. N., Champlin, C. A., & Chambers, J. A. (1998). Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9, 95-104.
16. Mendel, L. L., & Danhauer, J. L. (1997). Test administration and interpretation. In L. L. Mendel & J. L. Danhauer (Eds.), Audiologic evaluation and management and speech perception assessment (1st ed., pp. 15-57). San Diego, CA: Singular.
17. Newman, C., & Weinstein, B. E. (1988). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear and Hearing, 9, 81-85.
18. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085-1099.
19. Northern, J. L. (1992). Introduction to computerized probe microphone real ear measurements in hearing aid evaluation procedures. In H. G. Mueller, D. B. Hawkins, & J. L. Northern (Eds.), Probe microphone measurements: Hearing aid selection and assessment (1st ed., pp. 1-19). San Diego, CA: Singular.
20. Turner, C., Humes, L., Bentler, R., & Cox, R. (1996). A review of past research on changes in hearing aid benefit over time. Ear and Hearing, 17, 14S-29S.
21. Valente, M., Fabry, D. A., Potts, L. G., & Sandlin, R. E. (1998). Comparing the performance of the Widex SENSO digital hearing aid with analog hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9, 342-360.
22. Walden, B. E., Demorest, M., & Hepler, E. (1984). Self report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 49-56.
23. Walden, B. E., Surr, R. K., Cord, M. T., Edwards, B., & Olson, L. (2000). Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11, 540-560.
24. Weinstein, B. E. (1997). Introduction: Customer satisfaction with and benefit from hearing aids. Seminars in Hearing, 18, 3-5.
25. Wiley, T. L., Stoppenbach, D. T., Feldhake, L. J., Moss, K. A., & Thordardottir, E. T. (1995). Audiologic practices: What is popular versus what is supported by evidence. American Journal of Audiology, 4, 26-34.