Rethinking science and technology indicators for innovation policy in the twenty-first century

National Innovation, Indicators and Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 167-197

  Arundel, Anthony ^a   Colecchia, Alessandra ^b   Wyckoff, Andrew ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OECD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39149091801     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Advanced Technology Program (2003), A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP's First Decade, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, accessed 27 June 2005 at www.atp.nist.gov/eao/gcr03-857/contents.htm.
2. Ali-Yrkkö, J., Paija, L., Reilly, C. and P. Ylä-Antilla (2000), Nokia: A Big Company in a Small Country, Helsinki: ETLA, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
3. American Electronics Association (2005), Losing the Comparative Advantage? The Challenge for Science andTechnology in the United States,Washington,DC:AEA.
4. Beise, M. (2001), Lead Markets: Country Specific Success Factors of the Global Diffusion of Innovations, ZEW (Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftschung GmbH) economy studies 14, Heidelberg: Physical Verlag.
5. Business Week (2004), 'The innovation economy: special report', European edition, 11 October.
6. Castellacci, Fulvio, Stine Grodal, Sandro Mendonca and Mona Wibe (2004), 'Advances and challenges in innovation studies', this paper is an extended version of an article published in 2005 in Journal of Economic Issues, 39 (1), 91-122.
7. Colecchia, Alessandra and Paul Schreyer (2001), 'ICT investment and economic growth in the 1990s: Is the United States a unique case? A comparative study of nine OECD countries', Review of Economic Dynamics, 5 (2), 408-42.
8. Engardio, P. and D. Roberts (2004), 'The China price', International Business Week, 6 December.
9. Ericsson Corp. (2001), Ericsson Research 2001, accessed 27 June 2005 at www.ericsson.com/technology/docs/Ericsson_Research_2001.pdf.
10. EURESCOM (2001), 'ICT uses in everyday life', EUROSCOM P903 Newsletter, May.
11. European Commission (2004), Innobarometer 2004, Brussels: DG Enterprise.
12. European Commission (2005), European Innovation Scoreboard 2005. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance, Brussels: DG Enterprise.
13. Foray, Dominique and Fred Gault (2003), 'Measurement of knowledge management practices', in Dominique Foray and Fred Gault (eds), Measuring Knowledge Management in the Business Sector. First Steps, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Minister of Industry, Canada, pp. 11-28.
14. Freeman, C., J. Clark and L. Soete (1982), Unemployment and Technical Innovation, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15. Griliches, Zvi (1994), 'Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint', American Economic Review, 84 (1), 1-23.
16. Harhoff, D. and M. Reitzig (2002), 'Determinants of opposition against EPO Patent Grants - The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals', CEPR discussion paper no. 3645, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
17. Industrial Research Institute (IRI) (2000), R&D Facts 2000, Washington: IRI, accessed 4 May 2005 at www.iriinc.org/webiri/publications/R&Dfacts2000.pdf.
18. McGuckin, Robert H., Robert Inklaar, Bart van Ark and Sean Dougherty (2004), 'The structure of business R&D: recent trends and measurement implications', economics program working paper series, EPWP no. 04-01, New York: Conference Board, EPWP.
19. Mendoca, S., T.S. Pereira and M.M. Godhinho (2004), 'Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change', Research Policy, 33 (9), 1385-404.
20. Murphy, Marian (2002), 'Industry issues - organizational change and firm performance', STI working paper 2002/14, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
21. National Research Council (2005), Measuring Research and Development Expenditure in the U.S. Economy, Washington: National Academies Press.
22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1990), Technical Balance of Payments Manual, Paris: OECD.
23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1994), Patent Manual: Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators, GD, (94)114, Paris: OECD.
24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1995), Canberra Manual: The Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to S&T, Paris: OECD.
25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Eurostat (1997), Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Paris: OECD.
26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001a), The New Economy: Beyond the Hype, Paris: OECD.
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001b), Productivity Manual: A Guide to the Measurement of Industry-level and Aggregate Productivity Growth, Paris: OECD.
28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002), Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, Paris: OECD.
29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003a), Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003, Paris: OECD.
30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003b), Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations, Paris: OECD.
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004a), Compendium of Patent Statistics, Paris: OECD.
32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004b), Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2004, Paris: OECD.
33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005a), Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators, Paris: OECD.
34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005b), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Paris: OECD.
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005c), A Framework for Biotechnology Statistics, Paris: OECD.
36. Peleg, Soli (2004), 'Note on the problems with registration of transactions in connection with "fabless" enterprises - cross-border outsourcing', unpublished note prepared for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Working Party on National Accounts, STD/NAES/RD (2004)1, 12-15 October 2004.
37. Porter, M.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
38. Romer, Paul and Luis Rivera-Batiz (1991), 'Economic integration and endogenous growth', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), 531-55.
39. Sheehan, Jerry and Andrew Wyckoff (2003), 'Targeting R&D: economic and policy implications of increasing R&D spending', STI working papers series, DSTI/IND 2003/8, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.
40. Sichel, D.E. and S.D. Oliner (2002), 'Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going?', Economic Review, 2002 (Q3), 15-44.
41. Tether, Bruce (2001), 'Identifying innovation, innovators, and innovation behaviours a critical assessment of the Community Innovation Survey', CRIC discussion paper no. 48, Manchester: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition.
42. Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (2005), Electronic Activity Soars as Figures Rise, accessed 23 June 2005 at www.ucas.ac.uk/new/press/news170205/index.html.
43. von Hippel, E. (2005), 'Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation', paper presented at the Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy Conference, Washington: National Academies, 10-11 January.
44. Young, Alison (2001), 'An assessment of national and international practices for compiling data on health-related research and development', in Measuring Expenditure on Health-related R&D, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, pp. 7-10.
45. Zysman, John (2004), 'Creating value in a digital era: how do wealthy nations stay wealthy?', BRIE working papers, paper 165, Berkeley: Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy.