Multiperson utility

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 329-347

  Baucells, Manel ^a   Shapley, Lloyd S ^b  

^a IESE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Extended Pareto Rule; Incomplete preferences; Preference aggregation

Indexed keywords

EID: 39149089347     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: 10902473     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2007.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arrow K.J. Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Found. Monogr. vol. 12 (1963), Yale Univ. Press
2. Aumann R.J. Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 30 (1962) 445-462 and: A correction
3. Aumann R.J. Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica 32 (1964) 210-212
4. Aumann R.J., and Shapley L.S. Values of Non-Atomic Games (1974), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
5. Baucells M., and Sarin R. Group decisions with multiple criteria. Manage. Sci. 49 8 (2003) 1105-1118
6. Baucells, M., Shapley, L.S., 2007. Multiperson utility: The linearly independent case. IESE Business School. Available at http://webprofesores.iese.edu/mbaucells/
7. Bewley T. Knightian decision theory: Part i. Discussion paper No. 807. Cowles Foundation, Yale University. Published in. Dec. Econ. Finance 25 (1986) (2002)
8. Brannan M., Esplen F., and Gray J.J. Geometry (1999), Cambridge Univ. Press, Princeton
9. Dhillon A. Extended Pareto Rules and relative utilitarianism. Soc. Choice Welfare 15 (1998) 521-542
10. Dhillon A., and Mertens J.F. Relative utilitarianism. Econometrica 67 3 (1999) 471-498
11. Dubra J., Maccheroni F., and Ok E.A. Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. J. Econ. Theory 115 1 (2004) 118-133
12. Dyer J.S., and Sarin R.K. Group preference aggregation rules based on strenght of preference. Manage. Sci. 25 9 (1979) 822-832
13. In: Elster J., and Roemer J.E. (Eds). Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being (1991), Cambridge Univ. Press
14. In: Field J.V., and Gray J.J. (Eds). The Geometrical Work of Girard Desargues (1997), Springer-Verlag, New York
15. Fishburn P.C. A mixture-set axiomatization of conditional subjective utility. Econometrica 41 1 (1973) 1-25
16. Harsanyi J.C. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Polit. Economy 63 (1955) 309-321
17. Karni E. Impartiality and interpersonal comparisons of variations in well-being. Soc. Choice Welfare 21 1 (2003) 95-111
18. Luce R.D., and Krantz D.H. Conditional expected utility. Econometrica 39 2 (1971) 253-271
19. Nau R. The shape of incomplete preferences. Ann. Statist. 34 5 (2006) 2430-2448
20. Rigotti L., and Shannon C. Uncertainty and risk in financial markets. Econometrica 73 1 (2004) 203-243
21. Rockafellar T.R. Convex Analysis (1970), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
22. Sarin R.K. Strength of preference and risky choice. Operations Res. 30 5 (1982)
23. Schmeidler D. Competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders and incomplete preferences. Econometrica 37 4 (1969) 578-585
24. Sen A. Interpersonal aggregation and partial comparability. Econometrica 38 (1970) 393-409 and: A correction
25. Sen A. Interpersonal aggregation and partial comparability. Econometrica 40 (1972) 959
26. Shapley, L.S., 1975. Cardinal utility from intensity comparisons. RAND report R-1683-NSF, Santa Monica. See also Shubik (1982, Appendix A. 3)
27. Shapley L.S. Utility comparisons and the theory of games. In: Roth A.E. (Ed). The Shapley Value (1988), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA 307-319 Originally appeared in La Decision
28. Shapley L.S. Utility comparisons and the theory of games (1969), Editions du CNRS, Paris pp. 251-263
29. Shapley, L.S., Baucells, M., 1998. Multiperson utility. Working paper No. 779. Department of Economics, UCLA. Available at http://webprofesores.iese.edu/mbaucells/
30. Shapley L.S., and Shubik M. Preferences and utility. In: Shubik M. (Ed). Game Theory in the Social Sciences: Concepts and Solutions (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Originally appeared in Preferences and Utility, RAND report R-904/4-NSF, Santa Monica, 1974, Chapters 4 and 5
31. Shubik M. Game Theory in the Social Sciences: Concepts and Solutions (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
32. Skiadas C. Conditioning and aggregation of preferences. Econometrica 65 2 (1997) 347-367
33. Sobel J. Manipulation of preferences and relative utilitarianism. Games Econ. Behav. 37 (2001) 196-215
34. Vind K. Von Neumann-Morgenstern preferences. J. Math. Econ. 33 (2000) 109-122
35. Von-Neumann J., and Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944), Princeton Univ. Press
36. Weymark A. A reconsideration of the Harsanyi-Sen debate on utilitarianism. In: Elster J., and Roemer J.E. (Eds). Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being (1991), Cambridge Univ. Press