Achieving benefit for patients in primary care informatics: The report of a international consensus workshop at Medinfo 2007

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 255-261

  de Lusignan, Simon ^a   Teasdale, Sheila ^b  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerised; Computers; Family practice; Medical records; SNOMED

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA SYNTHESIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; WORKSHOP;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; INFORMATICS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 39149084706     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human. Building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press, 2000. www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309068371
2. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academy Press, 1999. www.nap.edu/ openbook.php?isbn=0309072808
3. Berwick DM. Errors today and errors tomorrow. New England Journal of Medicine 2003;348:2570-2.
4. Leape L and Berwick DM. Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? Journal of the American Medical Association 2005;293:2384-90.
5. Cruz-Correia RJ, Vieira-Marques PM, Ferreira AM, Almeida FC, Wyatt JC and Costa-Pereira AM. Reviewing the integration of patient data: how systems are evolving in practice to meet patient needs. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007;7:14.
6. Coiera E. Four rules for the reinvention of health care. British Medical Journal 2004;328:1197-9.
7. Garde S, Knaup P, Hovenga E and Heard S. Towards semantic interoperability for electronic health records. Methods of Information in Medicine 2007;46:332-43.
8. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005; 293:1223-38.
9. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006;144:742-52.
10. Shekelle PG, Morton SC and Keeler EB. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 2006;132:1-71.
11. International Medical Informatics Association. Primary Health Care Informatics Working Group. www.imia.org
12. de Lusignan S. Introduction to the Primary Care Informatics Working Group of the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI). Informatics in Primary Care 2003;11:175-6.
13. American Medical Informatics Association. Primary Care Informatics Working Group. pciwg.amia.org/
14. de Lusignan S, Teasdale S, Little D et al. Comprehensive computerised primary care records are an essential component of any national health information strategy: report from an international consensus conference. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;12:255-64.
15. WONCA. Informatics Working Party. www.globalfamilydoctor.com/aboutWonca/ workingo_grups/informatics/wonca_informatics.htm
16. Berwick DM. Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2003; 12:448.
17. Partners HealthCare. High Performance Indicators. www.partners.org/about/hpm.htm
18. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005;293:1197-203.
19. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL et al. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:5-11.
20. World Health Organization. International Classification of Primary Care Second Edition (ICPC-2). www.who.int/classifications/icd/ adaptations/icpc2/en/index.html
21. NHS Connecting for Health. Your Summary Care Record. www.nhscarerecords.nhs.uk/patients/what-will-change/summary-care-record
22. NHS Connecting for Health. GP2GP Records Transfer. www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/gpsupport/gp2gp
23. Data Accreditation web portal. www.primis.nhs.uk/data-accreditation
24. Health Level Seven. Standards. www.hl7.org/Library/standards.cfm
25. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61508. www.iec.ch/zone/ fsafety/
26. Office of the National Co-ordinator of Health IT (ONCHIT). www.govhealthit.com/topics/onchit.asp?topic=onchit
27. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. PQRI Toolkit. www.cms.hhs.gov/ PQRI/31_PQRIToolKit.asp
28. Health Ministers Advisory Council. Health Connect. www.health.gov.au/ internet/hconnect/publishing.nsf/Content/home
29. National eHealth Transitional Authority (NEHTA). www.nehta.gov.au
30. DOCLE systems. www.docle.com.au
31. Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee (NOMESCO). www.nom-nos.dk/nomesco.htm
32. Mendis K and Solangaarachchi I. PubMed perspective of family medicine research: where does it stand? Family Practice 2005;22:570-5.
33. [No authors listed] Is primary-care research a lost cause? The Lancet 2003;361:977.
34. de Maeseneer JM, van Driel ML, Green LA and van Weel C. The need for research in primary care. The Lancet 2003; 362:1314-19.
35. Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2005;38:176-88.
36. Primary Health Care Specialist Group of the British Computer Society. Informatics in Primary Care. www.radcliffe-oxford.com/ipc/