Internet methods in the study of women's physical activity

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 122, Issue , 2006, Pages 396-400

  Tsai, Hsiu Min ^a   Chee, Wonshik ^b   Im, Eun Ok ^c  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b The University of Texas at San Antonio   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet Method; Physical Activity

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

INDIRECT MEASUREMENTS; INTERNET BASED; INTERNET SURVEY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RECIPROCAL COMMUNICATIONS; RESPONSE RATE; SELF REPORTS; SELF-REPORTING;

NURSING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; RESEARCH; TAIWAN;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; RESEARCH; TAIWAN;

EID: 39049187206     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Ainsworth, B. E. Issues in the assessment of physical activity in women. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000;71(2): 37-42.
2. Chen, H. &Tan, Z. Toward a standardized Internet measurement. (Report No. IR-020-467). Honolulu, Hawaii: WebNet 99 World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceeding. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED448704)., 1999
3. Durante, R., &Ainsworth, B. E. The recall of physical activity: using a cognitive model of the question-answering process. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1996;28(10): 1282-1291.
4. Harada, N. D., Chiu, V., King, A. C., Stewart, A. L. An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Medicine &Science in Sports &Exercise, 2001;33(6): 962-970.
5. Henderson, K. A., &Ainsworth, B. E. Researching leisure and physical activity with women of color: Issues and emerging questions. Leisure Sciences, 2001;23: 21-34.
6. Ilieva, J., Baron, S., &Healey, N.M. Online surveys in marketing research: Pros and cons. International Journal of Market Research, 2002;44(3): 361-376.
7. Im, E. O., &Chee, W. A feminist critique on the use of the Internet in nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 2001;23(4): 67-82.
8. Im, E. O., &Chee, W. Issues in Internet research. Nursing Outlook, 2003;51(1): 6-12.
9. Im, E. O., &Chee, W. Issues in an Internet survey among midlife Asian women. Health Care for Women International, 2004;25: 150-164.
10. Jacobs, D. R. Comment on Issues in the assessment of physical activity in women. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000;71(2): 43-46.
11. Jacobson, S. Evaluating instrument for use in clinical nursing research, In M. Frank-Stromborg, &S.J.Olsen (3rd ed.). Instruments for clinical healthcare research. Boston: Jones &Bartlett. 2004. p. 3-19.
12. Jones, S. Attempting to net to net. Critical Studies in Media Communiction, 2001;18(4): 475-477.
13. Koch, N. S., &Emrey, J. A. The Internet and opinion measurement: Syrveying marginalized population. Social Science Quarterly, 2001;82(1): 131-138.
14. Laffrey, S. C. Physical activity among older Mexican American women. Research in Nursing &Health, 2000;23: 383-392.
15. Lenert, L. A., Looman, T., Agoncillo, T., Nguyen, M., Sturley, A., &Jackson, M. Potential validity of conducting research on headache in Internet population. Headache, 2002;42: 200-203.
16. Marsden, L., &Jones, R.B. Validation of web-based questionnaires regarding osteoporosis prevention in young British women. Health Bulletin, 2001;59(4): 254-262.
17. Masse, L. C. Reliability, validity, and methodological issues in assessing physical activity in a cross-cultural setting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000;71(2): 54-58.
18. Napolitano, M. A., Fotheringham, M., Tate, D., Sciamanna, C., Leslie, E., Owen, N., et al. Evaluation of an Internet-based physical activity intervention: A preliminary investigation. Annuals of Behavioral Medicine, 2003;25(2): 92-99.
19. Norman, A., Bellocco, R., Bergstrom, A., &Wolk, A. Validity and reproducibility of self-reported total physical activity-differences by relative weight. International Journal of Obesity, 2001;25(5): 682-688.
20. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., &Greenwald, A. G. Eresearch: Ethnic, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 2002;58(1): 161-176.
21. Patterson, P. Reliability, validity, and methodological response to the assessment of physical activity via self-report. Research Quarterly for Exercise Sport, 2000;71(2): 15-20.
22. Redeker, N. S., &Musanti, R. Women's physical activity: Conceptual issues. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 2002;18(1): 1-8.
23. Riva, G., &Galimberti, C. The mind in the Web: Psychology in the Internet age. CyberPsychology &Behavior, 2001;4(1): 1-5.
24. Rzewnicki, R., Auweele, Y. V., &Bourdeaudguij, L. D. Addressing overreporting on the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutrition, 2003;6(3): 299-305.
25. Sallis, J. F., &Saelens, B. E. Assessment for physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Research Quarterly for Exercise Sport, 2000;71(2): 1-14.
26. Strickland, O. L., Moloney, M. F., Dietrich, A. S., Myerburg, S., Cotsonis, G. A., &Johnson, R. V. Measurement issues related to data collection on the world wide web. Advances in Nursing Science, 2003;26(4): 246-256.