Northern thai women with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology have high prevalence of underlying invasive Carcinoma

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 477-479

  Kantathavorn, Nuttavut ^a   Phongnarisorn, Chailert ^a   Srisomboon, Jatupol ^a   Suprasert, Prapaporn ^a   Siriaunkgul, Sumalee ^b   Khunamornpong, Surapan ^b   Nimmanahaeminda, Kanchana ^b  

^a CHIANG MAI UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cervical carcinoma; Cervical cytology; High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Pap smear

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CANCER INVASION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COLPOSCOPY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREVALENCE; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; THAILAND; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; CONIZATION; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASMS, SQUAMOUS CELL; PREVALENCE; THAILAND; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 39049184853     PISSN: 15137368     EISSN: 2476762X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berdichevsky L, Karmin R, Chuang L (2004). Treatment of highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a 2- versus 3-step approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 190, 1424-6.
2. Boman F, Duhamel A, Trinh DQ, et al (2004). Histological diagnosis after Pap smears detecting cancer or high-grade lesion of the cervix. Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 32, 404-8.
3. Chute DJ, Covell J, Pambuccian SE, Stelow EB (2006). Cytologichistologic correlation of screening and diagnostic Papanicolaou tests. Diagn Cytopathol, 34, 503-6.
4. Ferlay S, Bray F, Pisani P (2001). GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Prevalence Worldwide. Version 1.0. IARC Cancer Base No.5. Lyon. IARC Press.
5. Jones BA, Davey DD (2000). Quality management in gynecologic cytology using interlaboratory comparison. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 124, 672-81
6. Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Khobjai A, Chandacham A, Tucksinsook U (2006). Complications of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia: a prospective study. J Med Assoc Thai, 89, 583-7.
7. Kinney WK, Manos MM, Hurley LB, Ransley JE (1998). Where's the high-grade cervical neoplasia? Obstet Gynecol, 91, 973-6
8. Luesley DM, Cullimore J, Redman CW, et al (1990). Loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone in patients with abnormal cervical smears. BMJ, 300, 1690-3.
9. Massad LS, Collins YC, Meyer PM (2001). Biopsy correlates of abnormal cervical cytology classified using the Bethesda system. Gynecol Oncol, 82, 516-22
10. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G (1994). A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol, 54, 175-9.
11. Numnum TM, Kirby TO, Leath CA 3rd, et al (2005). A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy? J Low Genit Tract Dis, 9, 2-6.
12. Pengsaa P, Jindavijak S (2003). Cervix uteri. In: Sriplung H, Sontipong S, Martin N, et al. editors. Cancer in Thailand vol.III, 1995-1997. Bangkok: Bangkok Medical Publisher, 49-50.
13. Sadan O, Yarden H, Schejter E, (2006). Treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: A "see and treat" versus a three-step approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, (in press).
14. Szurkus DC, Harrison TA (2003). Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: Correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 188, 1180-2.
15. Wright TC Jr, Richart RM, Ferenczy A, Koulos J (1992). Comparison of specimens removed by CO2 laser conization and the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol, 79, 147-53