|
Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 83-90
|
A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANESTHETIC AGENT;
CHLORAL HYDRATE;
HISTAMINE H1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST;
HYDROXYZINE;
HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT;
INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT;
MIDAZOLAM;
NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;
OXYGEN;
PETHIDINE;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD;
BREATHING;
CHILD BEHAVIOR;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONSCIOUS SEDATION;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROSSOVER PROCEDURE;
DENTAL ANESTHESIA;
DENTAL CARE;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG EFFECT;
FEMALE;
HEART RATE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ANALGESICS, OPIOID;
ANESTHESIA, DENTAL;
ANESTHETICS, COMBINED;
ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS;
CHILD BEHAVIOR;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
CHLORAL HYDRATE;
CONSCIOUS SEDATION;
CROSS-OVER STUDIES;
DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
HEART RATE;
HISTAMINE H1 ANTAGONISTS;
HUMANS;
HYDROXYZINE;
HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES;
MALE;
MEPERIDINE;
MIDAZOLAM;
OXYGEN;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RESPIRATION;
|
EID: 39049182015
PISSN: 00033006
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006(2006)53[83:APSOSR]2.0.CO;2 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (31)
|
References (0)
|