Histopathological outcomes of women with squamous cell carcinoma on cervical cytology

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 403-406

  Charoenkwan, Kittipat ^a   Srisomboon, Jatupol ^a   Suprasert, Prapaporn ^a   Siriaunkgul, Sumalee ^a   Khunamornpong, Surapan ^a  

^a Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cervical squamous cell carcinoma; Colposcopy; Histopathological diagnosis; Pap smear cytologym

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLPOSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 39049180386     PISSN: 15137368     EISSN: 2476762X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Benedet JL, Anderson GH, Boyes DA (1985). Colposcopic accuracy in the diagnosis of microinvasive and occult invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol, 65, 557-62.
2. Bigrigg MA, Codling BW, Pearson P, Read MD, Swingler GR (1990). Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit. Experience of low-voltage diathermy loop in 1000 patients. Lancet, 336, 229-31.
3. Bigrigg A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD (1994). Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet, 343, 32-4.
4. Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, et al. (2004). A "See and Treat" approach for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical cytology. J Med Assoc Thai, 87, 865-8.
5. Denny LA, Soeters R, Dehaeck K, Bloch B (1995). Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ? Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 102, 545-8.
6. Edebiri AA (1990). The relative significance of colposcopic descriptive appearances in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 33, 23-9.
7. Garcia LW, Goulart RA (2002). Squamous lesions. In: The Pap smear: controversies in practice. Eds: Ducatman BS, Wang HH. Arnold, London pp 157-181.
8. Holschneider CH, Felix JC, Satmary W, et al. (1999). A single-visit cervical carcinoma prevention program offered at an inner city church: A pilot project. Cancer, 86, 2659-67.
9. Hopman EH, Kenemans P, Helmerhorst TJ (1998). Positive predictive rate of colposcopic examination of the cervix uteri: an overview of literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 53, 97-106.
10. Jones BA, Davey DD (2000). Quality management in gynecologic cytology using interlaboratory comparison. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 124, 672-81.
11. Luesley DM, Cullimore J, Redman CW, et al. (1990). Loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone in patients with abnormal cervical smears. BMJ, 300, 1690-3.
12. Massad LS, Collins YC, Meyer PM (2001). Biopsy correlates of abnormal cervical cytology classified using the Bethesda system. Gynecol Oncol, 82, 516-22.
13. Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC, Miller ID, et al. (1992). A population-based study of microinvasive disease of the cervix--a colposcopic and cytologic analysis. Gynecol Oncol, 45, 9-12.
14. Santos C, Galdos R, Alvarez M, et al. (1996). One-session management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a solution for developing countries. A prospective, randomized Trial of LEEP versus laser excisional conization. Gynecol Oncol, 61, 11-5.
15. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. (2002). The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA, 287, 2114-9.
16. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ (2002). 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA, 287, 2120-9.