Cheek pouch use in relation to interspecific competition and predator risk for three guenon monkeys (cercopithecus spp.)

Primates

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 336-341

  Buzzard, Paul J ^a,b,c  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology NYCEP   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cercopithecus; Cheek pouches; Guenons; Interspecific competition; Predator risk

Indexed keywords

CERCOPITHECUS; CERCOPITHECUS CAMPBELLI; CERCOPITHECUS DIANA; CERCOPITHECUS PETAURISTA; HAPLORHINI;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CERCOPITHECUS; CHEEK; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD CHAIN; FRUIT; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CERCOPITHECUS; CHEEK; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD CHAIN; FRUIT; MALE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 39049178563     PISSN: 00328332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10329-006-0188-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227-267
2. Boesch C, Boesch H (1989) Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park. Am J Phys Anthropol 78:547-573
3. Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
4. Boinski S, Treves A, Chapman CA (2000) A critical evaluation of the influence of predators on primates: effects on group travel. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 43-72
5. Bshary R (2001) Diana monkeys, Cercopithecus diana, adjust their anti-predator response behaviour to human hunting strategies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:251-256
6. Bshary R, Noë R (1997) Anti-predation behavior of red colobus monkeys in the presence of chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:321-333
7. Buzzard PJ (2004) Interspecific competition among Cercopithecus campbelli, C. petaurista, and C. diana at Taï Forest, Côte d'Ivoire. PhD Thesis Columbia University, New York
8. Buzzard PJ (2006) Ecological partitioning in three guenons of the Taï Forest: Cercopithecus campbelli, C. petaurista and C. diana. Int J Primatol (in press)
9. Buzzard PJ, Eckardt W (2006) Social systems of the Taï guenons. In: Noë R, McGraw WS, Zuberbühler K (eds) Monkeys of the Taï Forest: an African primate community. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)
10. Chadwick-Jones JK (1989) Presenting and mounting in non-human primates: theoretical developments. J Soc Biol Stress 12:319-333
11. Cords M (2000) Mixed species association and group movement. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 73-99
12. Eckardt W, Zuberbühler K (2004) Cooperation and competition in forest monkeys. Behav Ecol 15:400-411
13. Hayes VJ, Henzi SP, Freedman L, Gaynor D (1992) The differential use of cheek pouches in a troop of Papio ursinus. Primates 33:477-500
14. Korstjens AH (2001) The mob, the secret sorority, and the phantoms: an analysis of the socio-ecological strategies of the three colobines of Taï. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
15. Lambert JE (2005) Competition, predation, and the evolutionary significance of the cercopithecine cheek pouch: the case of Cercopithecus and Lophocebus. Am J Phys Anthropol 126:183-192
16. Lehner PN (1996) Handbook of ethological methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. McGraw WS (1996) Positional behavior and habitat use of six monkeys in the Taï Forest, Côte d'Ivoire. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Stony Brook
18. Murray PF (1975) The role of cheek pouches in cercopithecine monkey adaptive strategy. In: Tuttle RH (ed) Primate functional morphology and evolution. Moulton, Paris, pp 151-194
19. Napier PH (1981) Catalogue of primates in the British Museum (Natural History) and elsewhere in the British Isles, Part 2: Family Cercopithecidae, Subfamily Cercopithecinae. British Museum (Natural History), London
20. Noë R, Bshary R (1997) The formation of red colobus-diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:253-259
21. Oates JF, Whitesides GH, Davies AG, Waterman PG, Green SM, Dasilva GL, Mole S (1990) Determinants of variation in tropical forest primate biomass: new evidence from West Africa. Ecology 71:328-343
22. Richard AF (1985) Primates in nature. Freeman, New York
23. Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT (1987) Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
24. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York
25. Srivastava A, Borries C, Sommer V (1991) Homosexual mounting in free-ranging female Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus). Arch Sex Behav 20:487-512
26. Stoorvogel JJ (1993) Gross inputs and outputs of nutrients in disturbed Forest, Taï Area Côte d'Ivoire. Veenman Drukkers, Wageningen
27. Vander Wall SB, Longland WS, Pyare S, Veech JA (1998) Cheek pouch capacities and loading rates of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia 113:21-28
28. Wolters S, Zuberbühler K (2003) Mixed-species associations of Diana and Campbell's monkeys: the costs and benefits of a forest phenomenon. Behaviour 140:371-385