Improving psychometric methods in health education and health behavior research

Health Education Research

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL.1, 2006, Pages

  Mâsse, Louise C ^a   Wilson, Mark ^b   Baranowski, Tom ^c   Nebeling, Linda ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY;

HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 39049177964     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl147     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Patrick DL, Chiang Y-P (eds). Health outcomes methodology: symposium proceedings. Med Care 2000; 38: 1-210.
2. Ory MG, Jordan PJ, Bazarre T. The behavior change consortium: setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research. Health Educ Res 2002; 17: 500-11. (Pubitemid 35178080)
3. Wilson M, Allen DD, Li JC. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: introducing item response modeling. Health Educ Res 2006; 21(Suppl 1): i4-i18.
4. Wilson M, Allen DD, Li JC. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach. Health Educ Res 2006; 21(Suppl 1): i19-i32.
5. Mâsse LC, Heesch KC, Eason KE et al. Evaluating the properties of a stage-specific self-efficacy scale for physical activity using classical test theory, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response modeling. Health Educ Res 2006; 21 (Suppl 1): i33-i46.
6. Watson K, Baranowski T, Thompson D. Item response modeling: an evaluation of the children's fruit and vegetable self-efficacy questionnaire. Health Educ Res 2006; 21 (Suppl 1): i47-i57.
7. Heesch KC, Mâsse LC, Dunn AL. Using Rasch modeling to re-evaluate three scales related to physical activity: enjoyment, perceived benefits and perceived barriers. Health Educ Res 2006; 21(Suppl 1): i58-i72.
8. Allen DD, Wilson M. Introducing multidimensional item response modeling in health behavior and health education research. Health Educ Res 2006; 21(Suppl 1): i73-i84.
9. Watson K, Baranowski T, Thompson D et al. Innovative application of a multidimensional item response model in assessing the influence of social desirability on the pseudorelationship between self-efficacy and behavior. Health Educ Res 2006; 21(Suppl 1): i85-i97.
10. Baranowski T, Allen DD, Mâsse LC et al. Does participation in an intervention affect responses on self-report questionnaires? Health Educ Res 2006; 21(Suppl 1): i98-i109.
11. Mâsse LC, Allen D, Wilson M et al. Introducing equating methodologies to compare test scores from two different self-regulation scales. Health Educ Res 2006; 21(Suppl 1): i110-i120.