|
Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-28
|
Comparison of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging with intraoperative measurements in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
ECHOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NONPARAMETRIC TEST;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PEROPERATIVE CARE;
PREOPERATIVE CARE;
RADIOGRAPHY;
SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
STANDARD;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INTRAOPERATIVE CARE;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PREOPERATIVE CARE;
STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;
TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
|
EID: 39049177500
PISSN: 18075932
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322005000100006 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (0)
|