Patterns of genitalic morphology around suture zones in North American Lycaeides (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): Implications for taxonomy and historical biogeography

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 172-180

  Lucas, L K ^a   Fordyce, J A ^b   Nice, C C ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybridization; Lycaeides; Morphology; Nabokov; Remington suture zones

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; HYBRIDIZATION; MORPHOLOGY; PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY; SUTURE ZONE; TAXONOMY;

GREAT LAKES [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

LEPIDOPTERA; LYCAEIDES; LYCAENIDAE;

EID: 39049169059     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[172:POGMAS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnold, R. A. 1993. The lotis blue, Lycaeides idas lotis (Litner), pp. 143-144. In T. R. New [ed.], Conservation biology of the Lycaenidae (butterflies). Occasional paper of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Species Survival Commission No. 8, Gland.
2. Austin, G. T., and D. D. Murphy. 1987. Zoogeography of Great-Basin butterflies - patterns of distribution and differentiation. Great Basin Nat. 47: 186-201.
3. Brown, F. M. 1950. Measurements and Lepidoptera. Lepidopt. News 4: 4-5.
4. Cech, R., and G. Tudor. 2005. Butterflies of the East Coast. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, and Oxford, United Kingdom.
5. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
6. Dowling, T. E., and C. L. Secor. 1997. The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 593-619.
7. Fordyce, J. A., and C. C. Nice. 2003. Variation in butterfly egg adhesion: adaptation to local host plant senescence characteristics? Ecol. Lett. 6: 23-27.
8. Fordyce, J. A., C. C. Nice, M. L. Forister, and A. M. Shapiro. 2002. The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: mate discrimination by two recently diverged species. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 871-879.
9. Forister, M. L., J. A. Fordyce, C. C. Nice, Z. Gompert, and A. M. Shapiro. 2006. Egg morphology varies among populations and habitats along a suture zone in the Lycaeides idas-melissa species complex (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 99: 933-937.
10. Gompert, Z., J. A. Fordyce, M. L. Forister, A. M. Shapiro, and C. C. Nice. 2006a. Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science (Wash., D.C.) 314: 1923-1925.
11. Gompert, Z., C. C. Nice, J. A. Fordyce, M. L. Forister, and A. M. Shapiro. 2006b. Identifying units of conservation using molecular systematics: the cautionary tale of the Karner blue butterfly. Mol. Ecol. 15: 1759-1768.
12. Guppy, C. S., and J. H. Shepard. 2001. Butterflies of British Columbia: including Western Alberta, Southern Yukon, the Alaska Panhandle, Washington, Northern Oregon, Northern Idaho, and Northwestern Montana. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
13. Higgins, L. G. 1985. The correct name for what has been called Lycaeides argyrognomon in North America. J. Lepidopt. Soc. 39: 145-146.
14. Layberry, R. A., P. W. Hall, and J. D. Lafontaine. 1998. The butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, Canada.
15. Levene, H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances, pp. 278-292. In Olkin et al. [eds.], Contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honor of Harold Hotelling, I. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
16. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
17. Nabokov, V. 1943. The nearctic forms of Lycaeies Hub. (Lycaenidae, Lepidoptera). Psyche 50: 87-99.
18. Nabokov, V. 1949. The nearctic members of Lycaeides Hübner (Lycaenidae, Lepidoptera). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 101: 479-541.
19. Nabokov, V. 1989. Letter to Robert Dirig, pp. 549-550. In D. Nabokov and M. J. Brucolli [eds.], Vladimir Nabokov, selected letters, 1940-1977. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Bruccoli Clark Layman, San Diego, CA, New York, NY, London, United Kingdom.
20. Nice, C. C., and A. M. Shapiro. 1999. Molecular and morphological divergence in the butterfly genus Lycaeides (Lepidoptera: Lycaeinidae) in North America: evidence of recent speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 936-950.
21. Nice, C. C., J. A. Fordyce, A. M. Shapiro, and R. ffrench-Constant. 2002. Lack of evidence for reproductive isolation among ecologically specialized lycaenid butterflies. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 702-712.
22. Nice, C. C., N. Anthony, G. Gelembiuk, D. Raterman, and R. ffrench-Constant. 2005. The history and geography of diversification within the butterfly genus Lycaeides in North America. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1741-1754.
23. Opler, P. A. 1992. A field guide to eastern butterflies. Houghton Miffin Co., Boston, MA, New York, NY, London, United Kingdom.
24. Remington, C. L. 1968. Suture zones of hybrid interaction between recently joined biotas. Evol. Biol. 2: 321-428.
25. Scott, J. A. 1986. The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
26. Swenson, N. G., and D. J. Howard. 2004. Do suture zones exist? Evolution 58: 2391-2397.
27. Swenson, N. G., and D. J. Howard. 2005. Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones, and phylogeographic breaks in North America. Am. Nat. 166: 581-591.
28. Van Valen, L. 2005. The statistics of variation, pp. 29-47. In B. Hallgrimsson and B. K. Hall (eds.), Variation: a central concept in biology. Elsevier Academic, Burlington, MA.