Visualization and rule validation in human-behavior representation

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 101-117

  Moya, Jean Lisa ^a   McKenzie, Frederic D ^b   Nguyen, Quynh Anh H ^a  

^a WernerAnderson Inc   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ABS; Agent based simulation; Cognitive model; Crowd modeling; HBR; Human behavior representation; Joint Crowd Federate ; Mathematical instantiation; Military simulation; Multiagent system; Validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049168496     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046878107308096     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akst, G. (2006). Musings on verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A) of analytical combat simulations. Phalanx, 39, 9-11.
2. Cares, J.R. (2002). The use of agent-based models in military concept development. In E. Yücesan, C.-H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon, & J. M. Charnes (Eds.), The 2002 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 935-939). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
3. Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. (2004). The verification, validation, and accreditation recommended practices guide. Alexandria, VA: Author.
4. Department of Defense. (2003a). Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 5000.1: The defense acquisition system. Washington, DC: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition & Technology.
5. Department of Defense. (2003b). Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5000.61: DoD modeling and simulation (M&S) verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A). Washington, DC: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition & Technology.
6. Dewar, J.A., Gillogly, J.J., Juncosa M.L. (1991). Non-monotonicity, chaos, and combat models (Report No. R-3995-RC). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
7. Gill, A., & Grieger, D. (2001). Validation of agent based distillation movement algorithms. Commonwealth Department of Defence: Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Electronics and Surveillance Laboratory.
8. Gill, A., & Shi, P. (2002). Movement algorithm verification and issues in joint concept development and experimentation. In 5th Project Albert International Workshop. Quantico, VA: Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory.
9. Harmon, S.Y., Hoffman, C.W.D., Gonzalez, A.J., Knauf, R., & Barr, V.B. (2002). Validation of human behavior representations. In Foundations for V&V in the 21st Century Workshop (Foundations '02) (pp. B3-1-B3-34). San Diego, CA: Society for Modeling and Simulation International.
10. Herington, J., Lane, A., Corrigan, N., & Golightly, J.A. (2002). Representation of historical events in a military campaign simulation model. In E. Y&FC;cesan, C.-H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon, & J. M. Charnes (Eds.), The 2002 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 859-863). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
11. Kenny, J.M., McPhail, C., Waddington, P., Heal, S., Ijames, S., Farrer, D.N., Taylor, J., & Odenthal, D. (2001). Crowd behavior, crowd control, and the use of non-lethal weapons. State College, PA: Institute for Non-Lethal Defense Technologies.
12. MacKenzie, G.R., Schulmeyer, G.G., & Yilmaz, L. (2002). Validation of the mission-based approach to representing command and control in simulation models of conflict. In Foundations for V&V in the 21st Century Workshop (Foundations '02) (pp. A1-1 - A1-40). San Diego, CA: Society for Modeling and Simulation International.
13. Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory. (2006). Project Albert. Retrieved January 17, 2007, from http://projectalbert.org
14. McCue, B. (2005). A chessboard model of the U-boat war in the Atlantic with applications to signals intelligence. Naval Research Logistics, 52, 107-136.
15. Moffat, J., Campbell, I., & Glover, P. (2004). Validation of the mission-based approach to representing command and control in simulation models of conflict. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 340-349.
16. Musse, S.R., & Thalmann, D. (2001). Hierarchical model for real time simulation of virtual human crowds. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 7, 152-164.
17. Nguyen, Q.H., McKenzie, F.D., & Petty, M.D. (2005). Crowd behavior cognitive model architecture design. In 2005 Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation. Orlando, FL: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization.
18. Palmore, J.I. (1996). Research on the causes of dynamical instability in combat models (Report No. AD-A315 079/4). Champaign, IL: Construction Engineering Research Lab.
19. Sanchez, S.M., & Lucas, T.W. (2002). Exploring the world of agent-based simulations: Simple models, complex analyses. In E. Y&FC;cesan, C.-H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon, & J. M. Charnes (Eds.), The 2002 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 116-126). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
20. Simpkins, S.D., Paulo, E.P., & Whitaker, L.R. (2001). Case study in modeling and simulation validation methodology. In The 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 758-766). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
21. Tolk, A. (2002). Human behavior representation-recent developments. In Lecture Series on Simulation of and for Military Decision Making; Studies, Analyses and Simulation Panel (SAS). Neuilly sur Seine, France: NATO Research & Technology Organization.
22. Tufte, E.R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
23. Vinyard, W.C., & Lucas, T.W. (2002). Exploring combat models for non-monotonicities and remedies. Phalanx, 35, 36-38.
24. Weisel, E.W. (2004). Models, composability, and validity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
25. Wooldridge, M.J. (2002). An introduction to multiagent systems. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.