Characterising kinds and instances of kinds: ERP reflections

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 226-240

  Prasada, Sandeep ^a   Salajegheh, Anna ^b   Bowles, Anita ^b   Poeppel, David ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

EID: 39049166173     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960701428292     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J. (1995) The generic book, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL
2. Federmeier, K. D. and Kutas, M. (1999) A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, pp. 469-495.
3. Fischler, I., Bloom, P. A., Childers, D. G., Roucos, S. E. and Perry Jr, N. W. (1983) Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 20, pp. 400-409.
4. Friederici, A. D., Pfeiffer, E. and Hahne, A. (1993) Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, pp. 183-192.
5. Gelman, S. A. (2003) The essential child, Oxford University Press, New York
6. Hagoort, P. and Brown, C. M. (1994) Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. Perspectives on sentence processing, pp. 45-80. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
7. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E. and West, W. C. (1999) Dual-coding, context-availablity, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal or Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, pp. 721-742.
8. Kounis, J. and Holcomb, P. J. (1992) Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, pp. 459-479.
9. Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., Meulen, A. ter, Link, G. and Chierchia, G. (1995) Genericity: An introduction. The generic book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
10. Kutas, M. (1993) In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, pp. 533-572.
11. Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A. (1980) Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, pp. 203-205.
12. Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A. (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, pp. 161-163.
13. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. K. and Besson, M. (1988) Event-related potentials asymmetries during the reading of sentences. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 69, pp. 218-233.
14. Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I. and Garrett, M. F. (1991) Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, pp. 151-165.
15. Osterhout, L. and Mobley, L. A. (1995) Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, pp. 739-773.
16. Prasada, S. (2000) Acquiring generic knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 66-72.
17. Prasada, S. and Dillingham, E. M. (2006) Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition, 99, pp. 73-112.
18. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P. and Brown, C. M. (1999) Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, pp. 657-671.
19. Van Petten, C. (1993) A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, pp. 485-531.
20. Van Petten, C. (1995) Words and sentences: Event-related brain potential measures. Psychophysiology, 32, pp. 511-525.