New governance, compliance, and principles-based securities regulation

American Business Law Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-60

  Ford, Cristie L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049163913     PISSN: 00027766     EISSN: 17441714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2008.00050.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Louis Kaplow, Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, 42 Duke L.J. 557, 559 60 (1992).
2. Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1685 (1976)
3. Carol M. Rose, Crystals and Mud in Property Law, 40 Stan. L. Rev. 577 (1988)
4. Antonin Scalia, The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175 (1989)
5. Frederick Schauer, The Tyranny of Choice and the Rulification of Standards, 14 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 803 (2005)
6. Pierre Schlag, Rules and Standards, 33 UCLA L. Rev. 379 (1985)
7. Kathleen M. Sullivan, The Supreme Court 1991 Term: Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 22 (1992)
8. Cass R. Sunstein, Problems with Rules, 83 Cal. L. Rev. 953 (1995).
9. James W. Colliton, Standards, Rules and the Decline of the Court in the Law of Taxation, 99 Dick. L. Rev. 265 (1995)
10. Colin S. Diver, The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules, 93 Yale L.J. 65, 98 (1983).
11. Russell B. Korobkin, Behavioral Analysis and Legal Form: Rules vs. Principles Revisited, 79 Or. L. Rev. 23 (2000)
12. P.S. Atiyah, From Principles to Pragmatism in the Function of the Judicial Process and the Law, 65 Iowa L. Rev. 1249, 1272 (1980)
13. Eric A. Posner, Standards, Rules, and Social Norms, 21 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 101, 116 17 (1997).
14. D.A. Rollie Thompson, Rules and Rulelessness in Family Law: Recent Developments, Judicial and Legislative, 18 Can. Fam. L.Q. 25 (2000 2001).
15. Russell B. Korobkin, Behavioral Analysis and Legal Form: Rules vs. Standards Revisited, 79 Or. L. Rev. 23, 30 (2000)
16. Neil MacCormick, Reconstruction After Deconstruction: A Response to CLS, 10 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 539, 545 (1990)
17. Frederick Schauer, The Convergence of Rules and Standards, 2003 N.Z. L. Rev. 303, 305 (2003).
18. Ian Ayres, Preliminary Thoughts on Optimal Tailoring of Contractual Rules, 3 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 1, 18 (1993)
19. Margaret Jane Radin, Reconsidering the Rule of Law, 69 B.U. L. Rev. 781, 814 (1989)
20. Keith C. Culver, Varieties of Vagueness, 54 Univ. Toronto L.J. 109 (2004).
21. Frederick Gill, Principles-Based Accounting Standards, 28 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 967 (2003)
22. William W. Bratton, Enron, Sarbanes-Oxley and Accounting: Rules Versus Principles Versus Rents, 48 Vill. L. Rev. 1023 (2003)
23. David Kershaw, Evading Enron: Taking Principles Too Seriously in Accounting Regulation, 68 Mod. L. Rev. 594 (2005).
24. Peter Jeffrey, International Harmonization of Accounting Standards, and the Question of Off-Balance Sheet Treatment, 12 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 341 (2002)
25. John C. Coffee Jr., Gatekeeper Failure and Reform: The Challenge of Fashioning Relevant Reforms, 84 B.U. L. Rev. 301, 342 44 (2004)
26. David S. Ruder et al., The SEC at 70: The Securities and Exchange Commission's Pre-and Post-Enron Responses to Corporate Financial Fraud: An Analysis and Evaluation, 80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1103 (2005)
27. Ben Maiden, Canadian Lawyers Take New Look At Due Diligence, 24 Int'l. Fin. L. Rev. 37 (2005)
28. Gerry Gallery Natalie Gallery, Inadequacies and Inconsistencies in Superannuation Fund Financial Disclosure: The Need for a Principles-Based Approach, 36 Aust. Econ. Rev. 89 (2003)
29. Jonathan Edwards Simon Wolfe, Compliance: A Review, 13 J. Fin. Reg. & Compliance 48, 49 50 (2005).
30. Peter L. Strauss, Publication Rules in the Rulemaking Spectrum: Assuring Proper Respect for an Essential Element, 53 Admin. L. Rev. 803 (2001).
31. Roberta S. Karmel, Realizing the Dream of William O. Douglas - The Securities and Exchange Commission Takes Over Corporate Governance, 30 Del. J. Corp. L. 79 (2005)
32. Patrick Dunleavy et al., New Public Management is Dead - Long Live Digital Era Governance, 16 J. Public Adm. Res. & Theory 467 (2006).
33. Michael C. Dorf Charles F. Sabel, A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism, 98 Colum. L. Rev. 267, 345 56 (1998)
34. James S. Liebman Charles F. Sabel, A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: the Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform, 28 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 183 (2003)
35. Charles F. Sabel William H. Simon, Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1015 (2004)
36. Susan P. Sturm, A Normative Theory of Public Law Remedies, 79 Geo. L.J. 1357, 1365 76 (1991)
37. Susan Sturm, Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach, 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458, 555 (2001).
38. Bradley C. Karkkainen, "New Governance" in Legal Thought and In the World: Some Splitting as Antidote to Overzealous Lumping, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 471 (2004)
39. Orly Lobel, The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 342 (2004).
40. Avitai Aviram, Regulation by Networks, 2003 BYU L. Rev. 1179 (2003)
41. Melvin A. Eisenberg, Corporate Law and Social Norms, 99 Colum. L. Rev. 1253 (1999)
42. Edward B. Rock, Saints and Sinners: How Does Delaware Corporate Law Work?, 44 UCLA L. Rev. 1009 (1997)
43. Mark C. Suchman, Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, 20 Acad. Mgmt. Rev. 571 (1995)
44. Cass Sunstein, Social Norms and Social Roles, 96 Colum. L. Rev. 903 (1996).
45. Kimberley D. Krawiec, Cosmetic Compliance and the Failure of Negotiated Governance, 81 Wash. U. L.Q. 487 (2001)
46. William S. Laufer, Corporate Liability, Risk Shifting, and the Paradox of Compliance, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 1343 (1999)
47. Cristie L. Ford, Toward a New Model for Securities Law Enforcement, 57 Admin. L. Rev. 757, 791 92 & 806-10 (2005).
48. Edward L. Rubin, Images of Organizations and Consequences of Regulation, 6 Theoretical Inq. L. 347, 376 77 (2005)
49. Brandon L. Garrett James S. Liebman, Experimentalist Equal Protection, 22 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 261, 291 92 (2004)
50. Jody Freeman, Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State, 45 UCLA L. Rev. 1, 21 22 (1997).
51. Christine E. Parker, Reinventing Regulation Within the Corporation: Compliance-Oriented Regulatory Innovation, 32 Admin. & Soc'y 529, 531 33 (2000)
52. Bradley C. Karkkainen, Adaptive Ecosystem Management and Regulatory Penalty Defaults: Toward a Bounded Pragmatism, 87 Minn. L. Rev. 943 (2003)
53. Kip Betz, Comprehensive Penalty Review Underway at NYSE Regulation, Official Says, 36 Sec. Reg. & L. Rep. (BNA) 2116 (Dec. 6, 2004
54. Pablo De Greiff, Deliberative Democracy and Punishment, 5 Buff. Crim. L. Rev. 373 (2002)
55. Sol Picciotto, Constructing Compliance: Game-Playing, Tax Law and the Regulatory State, 29 Law & Pol'y 11 (2007).
56. Peter J. May, Mandate Design and Implementation: Enhancing Implementation Efforts and Shaping Regulatory Styles, 12 J. Pol'y Analysis & Mgmt. 634, 653 (1993).
57. Gerald W. Heaney, The Reality of Guidelines Sentencing: No End to Disparity, 28 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 161, 192 97 (1991)
58. Cynthia K.Y. Lee, From Gatekeeper to Concierge: Reigning in the Federal Prosecutor's Expanding Power Over Substantial Assistance Departures, 50 Rutgers L. Rev. 199, 235 40 (1997).
59. Brandon L. Garrett, Structural Reform Prosecution, 93 Va. L. Rev. 853 (2007)
60. Robert A. Prentice, The Inevitability of a Strong SEC, 91 Cornell L. Rev. 775 (2006)
61. Jody Freeman, The Private Role in Public Governance, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 543 (2000)
62. Jody Freeman, Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law, 52 Admin. L. Rev. 813 (2000)
63. Daniel Guttman, Public Purpose and Private Service: The Twentieth Century Culture of Contracting Out and the Evolving Law of Diffused Sovereignty, 52 Admin. L. Rev. 859 (2000)
64. Gillian Metzger, Privatization as Delegation, 103 Colum. L. Rev. 1367 (2003)
65. Michael P. Vandenbergh, The Private Life of Public Law, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 2029 (2005)
66. Paul R. Verkuil, Public Law Limitation on Privatization of Government Functions, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 397 (2006).
67. Edward Rubin, The Myth of Accountability and the Anti-Administrative Impulse, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 2073, 2131 34 (2005)
68. Bruce A. Ackerman Richard B. Stewart, Comment, Reforming Environmental Law, 37 Stan. L. Rev. 1333 (1985)
69. Eric W. Orts, Reflexive Environmental Law, 89 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1227 (1995)
70. William H. Simon, Legality, Bureaucracy, and Class in the Welfare System, 92 Yale L.J. 1998 (1983).
71. James S. Liebman Charles F. Sabel, The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Post-Desegregation Civil Rights Agenda, 81 N.C. L. Rev. 1703, 1704 07 (2003)
72. Susan Sturm, The Architecture of Inclusion: Advancing Workplace Equity in Higher Education, 29 Harv. J. L. & Gender 247 (2006).
73. Gary Hagland, A Critical Evaluation of the Compliance Administrative Control System Within Albert E Sharp and its Motivational Impact Upon Those It is Supposed to Control, 3 J. Finan. Reg. & Compl. 28, 33 (1994)
74. Donald C. Langevoort, The Social Construction of Sarbanes-Oxley, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 1817, 1828 (2007).
75. Michael C. Dorf, After Bureaucracy, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1245 (2004).
76. Ian Ayres Jennifer Gerarda Brown, Mark(et)ing Nondiscrimination: Privatizing ENDA with a Certification Mark, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1639 (2006)
77. Cristie L. Ford, In Search of the Qualitative Clear Majority: Democratic Experimentalism and the Quebec Secession Reference, 39 Alta. L. Rev. 511, nn. 26 33 and accompanying text (2001)
78. Errol Meidinger, The New Environmental Law: Forest Certification, 10 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 211 (2003)
79. Richard B. Stewart, A New Generation of Environmental Regulation, 29 Cap. U. L. Rev. 21, 34 43 (2001)