In women with suspected TB, brief sputum-submission instruction improved sampling quality and TB detection: Commentary

Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 14-

  Khan, Mishalk S ^a   Gonzalez, Anne V ^b   Menzies, Dick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG TUBERCULOSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SALIVA ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SHORT SURVEY; SPUTUM EXAMINATION; SPUTUM LEVEL; SPUTUM SMEAR; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 39049153314     PISSN: 13565524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ebm.13.1.14     Document Type: Short Survey

References (1)

1. Moher D, Schulz KF. Altman D, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001;285:1987-91.