Detection of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina in the acute setting: Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomographic angiography

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Vanhoenacker, Piet K ^a   Decramer, Isabel ^a,b   Bladt, Olivier ^a   Sarno, Giovanna ^b   Bevernage, Charlotte ^a   Wijns, William ^b  

^a OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EMERGENCY WARD; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NON ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW;

ANGINA, UNSTABLE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 39049143284     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-7-39     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Lee TH Rouan GW Weisberg MC Brand DA Acampora D Stasiulewicz C Walshon J Terranova G Gottlieb L Goldstein-Wayne B Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room Am J Cardiol 1987, 60:219-224 10.1016/ 0002-9149(87)90217-7 3618483
2. McCaig LF Burt CW National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 emergency department summary Adv Data 2004, 1-34 15068333
3. Pope JH Aufderheide TP Ruthazer R Woolard RH Feldman JA Beshansky JR Griffith JL Selker HP Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1163-1170 10.1056/ NEJM200004203421603 10770981
4. Hoffmann MH Shi H Schmitz BL Schmid FT Lieberknecht M Schulze R Ludwig B Kroschel U Jahnke N Haerer W Brambs HJ Aschoff AJ Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography JAMA 2005, 293:2471-2478 10.1001/jama.293.20.2471 15914747
5. Leber AW Knez A von Ziegler F Becker A Nikolaou K Paul S Wintersperger B Reiser M Becker CR Steinbeck G Boekstegers P Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:147-154 10.1016/ j.jacc.2005.03.071 15992649
6. Raff GL Gallagher MJ O'Neill WW Goldstein JA Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:552-557 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056 16053973
7. Hamon M Biondi-Zoccai GG Malagutti P Agostoni P Morello R Valgimigli M Hamon M Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: A meta-analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1896-1910 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.028 17084268
8. White CS Kuo D Kelemen M Jain V Musk A Zaidi E Read K Sliker C Prasad R Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: Can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 185:533-540 16037533
9. Gallagher MJ Ross MA Raff GL Goldstein JA O'Neill WW O'neil B The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients Ann Emerg Med 2007, 49:125-136 10.1016/ j.annemergmed.2006.06.043 16978738
10. Hoffmann U Pena AJ Moselewski F Ferencik M Abbara S Cury RC Chae CU Nagurney JT MDCT in early triage of patients with acute chest pain AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187:1240-1247 10.2214/AJR.05.2240 17056911
11. Hoffmann U Nagurney JT Moselewski F Pena A Ferencik M Chae CU Cury RC Butler J Abbara S Brown DF Manini A Nichols JH Achenbach S Brady TJ Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain Circulation 2006, 114:2251-2260 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634808 17075011
12. Olivetti L Mazza G Volpi D Costa F Ferrari O Pirelli S Multislice CT in emergency room management of patients with chest pain and medium-low probability of acute coronary syndrome Radiol Med (Torino) 2006, 111:1054-1063 10.1007/s11547-006-0104-6 17171528
13. Sato Y Matsumoto N Ichikawa M Kunimasa T Iida K Yoda S Takayama T Uchiyama T Saiti S Nagao K Tanaka H Inoue F Furuhashi S Takahashi M Koyamam Y Efficacy of multislice computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department Circ J 2005, 69:1047-1051 10.1253/circj.69.1047 16127184
14. Goldstein JA Gallagher MJ O'Neill WW Ross MA O'Neil BJ Raff GL A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:863-871 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.064 17320744
15. Rubinshtein R Halon DA Gaspar T Jaffe R Karkabi B Flugelman MY Kogan A Shapira R Peled N Lewis BS Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin Circulation 2007, 115:1762-1768 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618389 17372178
16. Meijboom W Mollet N Van Mieghem C Weustink A Pugliese F VanPelt N Cademartirir F Vourvouri F de Jaegere P Krestin GP de Feyter PJ 64-Slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome Heart 2007, 93:1386-1392 10.1136/ hrt.2006.112771 17344332
17. Deville W Buntinx F Bouter L Montori V de Vet H van der Windt D Bezemer P Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines BMC Medical Research Methodology 2002, 2:9 117243 12097142 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9
18. Staunton M Evidence-based radiology: Steps 1 and 2 - asking answerable questions and searching for evidence Radiology 2007, 242:23-31 17185659
19. Dodge JT Jr Brown BG Bolson EL Dodge HT Intrathoracic spatial location of specified coronary segments on the normal human heart. Applications in quantitative arteriography, assessment of regional risk and contraction, and anatomic display Circulation 1988, 78:1167-1180 3180376
20. Whiting P Rutjes AW Reitsma JB Bossuyt PM Kleijnen J The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 2003, 3:25 305345 14606960 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
21. Bossuyt PM Reitsma JB Bruns DE Gatsonis CA Glasziou PP Irwig LM Lijmer JG Moher D Rennie D de Vet HC Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative Fam Pract 2004, 21:4-10 10.1093/fampra/cmh103 14760036
22. Thompson SG Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated BMJ 1994, 309:1351-1355 7866085
23. Gavaghan DJ Moore RA McQuay HJ An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data Pain 2000, 85:415-424 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00302-4 10781914
24. Thompson SG Sharp SJ Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods Stat Med 1999, 18:2693-2708 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2693::AID-SIM235>3.0.CO;2-V 10521860
25. Higgins JP Thompson SG Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Stat Med 2002, 21:1539-1558 10.1002/sim.1186 12111919
26. Higgins JP Thompson SG Deeks JJ Altman DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 2003, 327:557-560 192859 12958120 10.1136/ bmj.327.7414.557
27. Egger M Davey SG Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 1997, 315:629-634 2127453 9310563
28. Sterne JA Egger M Smith GD Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis BMJ 2001, 323:101-105 1120714 11451790 10.1136/ bmj.323.7304.101
29. Berkey CS Hoaglin DC Mosteller F Colditz GA A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis Stat Med 1995, 14:395-411 10.1002/sim.4780140406 7746979
30. Littenberg B Moses LE Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: A new meta-analytic method Med Decis Making 1993, 13:313-321 10.1177/0272989X9301300408 8246704
31. Moses LE Shapiro D Littenberg B Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: Data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations Stat Med 1993, 12:1293-1316 8210827
32. Irwig L Tosteson AN Gatsonis C Lau J Colditz G Chalmers TC Mosteller F Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests Ann Intern Med 1994, 120:667-676 8135452
33. Walter SD Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data Stat Med 2002, 21:1237-1256 10.1002/sim.1099 12111876
34. Vanhoenacker PK Heijenbrok-Kal MH Vanheste R Decramer I Van Hoe L Wijns W Hunink MGM Multidetector CT Angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Performance Radiology 2007, 244:419-428 17641365
35. Ioannidis JP Salem D Chew PW Lau J Accuracy of imaging technologies in the diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: A meta-analysis Ann Emerg Med 2001, 37:471-477 10.1067/mem.2001.114901 11326183
36. Klocke FJ Baird MG Lorell BH Bateman TM Messer JV Berman DS O'Gara PT Carabello BA Russel RO Verqueira MD John Sutton MG DeMaria AN Udelson JE Kennedy JW Verani MS Williams KA Antman EM Smith SC Alper JS Gregoratis G Anderson JL Hiratzka LF Faxon DP Hunt SA Fuster V Jacobs AK Gibbons RJ Russel RO ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging - executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging) J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42:1318-1333 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.011 14522503
37. Udelson JE Beshansky JR Ballin DS Feldman JA Griffith JL Handler J Heller GV Hendel RC Pope JH Ruthazer R Spiegler EJ Woolard RH Selker HP Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: A randomized controlled trial JAMA 2002, 288:2693-2700 10.1001/jama.288.21.2693 12460092
38. Hausleiter J Meyer T Hadamitzky M Huber E Zankl M Martinoff S Kastrati A Schomig A Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: Impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates Circulation 2006, 113:1305-1310 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602490 16520411
39. Sato Y Matsumoto N Yoda S Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography in a patient with unstable angina Int J Cardiol 2006, 111:309-310 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.069 16111777
40. Sato Y Komatsu S Matsumoto N Tani S Kunimasa T Masubuchi M Kunimoto S Kasmaki Y Takahashi M Uchiyama T Saito S Whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis and atherosclerotic coronary artery plaque in a patient with unstable angina Int J Cardiol 2007, 115:262-264 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.01.044 16759719
41. Cademartiri F Runza G Mollet NR Luccichenti G Belgrano M Bartolotta TV Galia M Midiri M Pozzi MR Krestin GP Impact of intravascular enhancement, heart rate, and calcium score on diagnostic accuracy in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography Radiol Med (Torino) 2005, 110:42-51 16163138
42. Cademartiri F Mollet NR Runza G Belgrano M Malagutti P Meijboom BW Midiri M de Feyter PJ Krestin GP Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2006, 22:101-105 10.1007/s10554-005-9010-6 16077999
43. Cademartiri F Mollet NR Lemos PA Saia F Runza G Midiri M Krestin GP de Feyter PJ Impact of coronary calcium score on diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary stenosis with multislice computed tomography angiography Am J Cardiol 2005, 95:1225-1227 10.1016/ j.amjcard.2005.01.051 15877996
44. Sirineni GK Kalra MK Pottala K Waldrop S Syed M Tigges S Effect of contrast concentration, tube potential and reconstruction kernels on MDCT evaluation of coronary stents: An in vitro study Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007, 23:253-263 10.1007/s10554-006-9107-6 16821123