Using instrumented paper diaries to document self-monitoring patterns in weight loss

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 182-193

  Burke, Lora E ^a   Sereika, Susan M ^a   Music, Edvin ^a   Warziski, Melanie ^a   Styn, Mindi A ^a   Stone, Arthur ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherence; Behavioral treatment of obesity; Instrumented paper diaries (IPD); Obesity; Self monitoring; Self report; Weight loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBESITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF MONITORING; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; DIET RECORDS; DIET, REDUCING; EATING; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELF DISCLOSURE; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 39049135295     PISSN: 15517144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ogden C., Carroll M., Curtin L., et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 295 (2006) 1549-1555
2. Wing R.R., and Hill J.O. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu Rev Nutr 21 (2001) 323-341
3. Kanfer F.H. Self-monitoring: methodological limitations and clinical applications. J Consult Clin Psychol 35 (1970) 148-152
4. Wing R.R. Behavioral approaches to the treatment of obesity. In: Bray G.A., Bourchard C., and James W.P.T. (Eds). Handbook of obesity: clinical applications (2004), Marcel Dekker, New York 147-167
5. Baker R., and Kirschenbaum D. Self-monitoring may be necessary for successful weight control. Behav Ther 24 (1993) 377-394
6. Baker R.C., and Kirschenbaum D.S. Weight control during the holidays: highly consistent self-monitoring as a potentially useful coping mechanism. Health Psychol 17 (1998) 367-370
7. Guare J.C., Wing R.R., Marcus M., et al. Analysis of change in eating behavior and weight loss in Type II diabetic patient: which behaviors to change. Diabetes Care 12 (1989) 500-503
8. Burke L.E., Choo J., Music E., et al. Patterns of self-monitoring behavior affect weight change among weight loss study participants. Ann Behav Med 31 Supp (2006) S017
9. Boutelle K.N., Kirschenbaum D.S., Baker R.C., and Mitchell M.E. How can obese weight controllers minimize weight gain during the high risk holiday season? By self-monitoring very consistently (empircal articles). Health Psychol 18 (1999) 364-368
10. Sperduto W.A., Thompson H.S., and O'Brien R.M. The effect of target behavior monitoring on weight loss and completion rate in a behavior modification program for weight reduction. Addict Behav 11 (1986) 337-340
11. Stone A.A., Shiffman S., Schwartz J.E., Broderick J.E., and Hufford M.R. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials 24 (2003) 182-199
12. Hufford M.R., and Shiffman S. Assessment methods for patient-reported outcomes. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 11 (2003) 77-86
13. Jobe J.B. Cognitive process in self-report. In: Stone A.A., Turkkan J.S., Bachrach C., et al. (Eds). The science of self-report: implication for research and practice (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah New Jersey
14. Tourangeau R. Remembering what happened: memory errors and survey reports. In: Stone A.A., Turkkan J.A., Bachrach C.A., et al. (Eds). The science of self-report (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 29-48
15. Glanz K., Murphy S., Moylan J., Evensen D., and Curb J. Improving dietary self-monitoring and adherence with hand-held computers: a pilot study. Am J Health Promot 20 (2006) 165-170
16. Bolger N., Davis A., and Rafaeli E. Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu Rev Psychol 54 (2003) 579-616
17. Stone A.A., Shiffman S., Schwartz J.E., Broderick J.E., and Hufford M.R. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ 324 (2002) 1193-1194
18. Burke L.E., Choo J., Music E., et al. PREFER study: a randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management - rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials 27 (2006) 34-48
19. Burke L.E., Sereika S., Choo J., et al. Ancillary study to the PREFER trial: a descriptive study of participants' patterns of self-monitoring: rationale, design and preliminary experiences. Contemp Clin Trials 27 (2006) 23-33
20. Stone A.A., Broderick J.E., Schwartz J.E., et al. Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain 104 (2003) 343-351
21. Wadden T.A., Berkowitz R.I., Womble L.G., et al. Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity. N Engl J Med 353 (2005) 2111-2120
22. Dunbar-Jacob J., Burke L.E., Rohay J.M., et al. How comparable are self-report, pill count, and electronically monitored adherence data?. Circulation 96 (1997) I-738
23. Osterberg L., and Blaschke T.F. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 353 (2005) 487-497
24. Burke L.E., Choo J., Music E., et al. Does receiving treatment preference affect adherence and weight loss?. Ann Behav Med 29 (2005) S080
25. Sevick M.A., Piraino B., Sereika S., et al. A pilot study of PDA-based dietary self-monitoring in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr 15 (2005) 304-311
26. Tate D.F., Jackvony E.H., and Wing R.R. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med 166 (2006) 1620-1625
27. Burnier M. Long-term compliance with antihypertensive therapy: another facet of chronotherapeutics in hypertension. Blood Press Monit (2000) S32-S34 [Suppl]
28. Burnier M., and Brunner H.R. Impact on clinical outcomes. In: Burke L.E., and Ockene I.S. (Eds). Compliance in healthcare and research (2001), Futura Publishing Co., Armonk, NY 299-309