Private finance initiative - The theory behind practice

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 151-167

  Kee, James Edwin ^a   Forrer, John ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capital budget process; Cost of capital; Private finance initiative

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049131503     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01900690701410984     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (1999) The private finance initiative: Clarification of a future research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 15:2, pp. 95-114.
2. Savas, E. S. (2000) Privatization and public-private partnerships, p. 4. Chatham House, New York
3. Forrer, J., Kee, J. and Zhang, Z. (2002) Greenway case study, draft. The George Washington University, Washington, D.C
4. Sharman and Lord, C. (2002) Privatization and Competition as Reform; As Presentation to George Washington University class.London
5. Hood, C. (1995) The 'new public management' in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20:23, pp. 93-109.
6. Dunleavy, P. and Hood, C. (1994) From Old Public Administration to New Public Management. Public Money and Management, 14:3, pp. 9-16.
7. Terry, F. (1996) The Private Finance Initiative - Overdue reform or policy breakthrough?. Public Money & Management, 16:1, pp. 9-16.
8. Grout, P. A. (1997) The Economics of the Private Finance Initiative. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13:4, pp. 53-66.
9. Timmins, N. (2000) Momentum increases though doubters remain. Financial Times, p. 1.
10. Allen, G. (2001) The Private Finance Initiative (PFI).House of Commons Library, Economic Policy and Statistics Section, London
11. Middleton, N. (2001) Public private partnerships: Argument turns to action. International Privatization Review, p. 6.
12. Stone, T. (2002) Privatization and Competition as Reform; As presentation to George Washington University class. London
13. Lee Jr., R. D., Johnson, R. W. and Joyce, P. G. (2004) Public budgeting systems, p. 436. Jones and Bartlett Publishers
14. Arthur Andersen and Enterprise LSE (2000) Value for Money Drivers in the Private Finance Initiative.The Treasury Taskforce, London, UK
15. Private Finance Panel, HM Treasury (1995) Private Opportunity, Public Benefit: Progressing the Private Finance Initiative. pp. 32-33. HM Treasury, London
16. Stone, T. (2002) Privatization & PPP: What are the differences?. Privatization & Public Private Partnership Review., 7, p. 1. Euromoney Publication, 2002
17. Feigenbaum, H., Henig, J. and Hammett, C. (2000) Shrinking the state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Sclar, E. D. (2000) You don't always get what you pay for, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
19. Niskanen Jr., W. (1971) Bureaucracy and representative government, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago
20. Tullock, G. (1965) The politics of bureaucracy, Public Affairs Press, Washington, DC
21. Downs, A. (1967) Inside bureaucracy, Little, Brown, Boston
22. Salanié, B. (1997) The economics of contracts: A primer, p. 11. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
23. National Research Council (1998) Committee to Assess Techniques for Developing Maintenance and Repair Budgets for Federal Facilities. Stewardship of federal facilities, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
24. Mikesell, R. R. (1997) The rate of discount for evaluating public projects, The American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC
25. Kee, J. E. (1994) Benefit-Cost analysis in program evaluation. Handbook of practical program evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
26. Arrow, K. (1969) The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non-market allocation. The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: The PBB-System Joint Economic Committee, 91st Cong., 1st Session, 1, Washington, DC
27. Furubotn, E. and Richter, R. (1997) Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor