Predictive models and prostate cancer

Nature Clinical Practice Urology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 82-92

  Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^a   Hutterer, Georg C ^b  

^a Department of the Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit ^*  (Canada)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; NOMOGRAM; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; SEMINAL VESICLE; TESTIS BIOPSY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

BIOPSY; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NOMOGRAMS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 39049131219     PISSN: 17434270     EISSN: 17434289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0972     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Jemal A et al. (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57: 43-66
2. Steuber T et al. (2006) Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side specific extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 175:939-944
3. Irish WD et al. (2003) Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 2967-2974
4. Eastham JA et al. (1999) Development of a nomogram that predicts the probability of a positive prostate biopsy in men with an abnormal digital rectal examination and a prostate-specific antigen between 0 and 4 ng/ml. Urology 54: 709-713
5. Karakiewicz PI et al. (2005) Development and validation of a nomogram predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy based on patient age, digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen. J Urol 173: 1930-1934
6. Yanke BV et al. (2006) African-American race is a predictor of prostate cancer detection: Incorporation into a pre-biopsy nomogram. BJU Int 98: 783-787
7. Chun FK et al. (2007) Development and external validation of an extended 10-core biopsy nomogram. Eur Urol 52: 436-445
8. O'Dowd GJ et al. (2000) Analysis of repeated biopsy results within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. Urology 55: 553-559
9. Lopez-Corona E et al. (2003) A nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session. J Urol 170: 1184-1188
10. Yanke BV et al. (2005) Validation of a nomogram for predicting positive repeat biopsy for prostate cancer. J Urol 173: 421-424
11. Chun FK et al. (2007) Development and external validation of an extended repeat biopsy nomogram. J Urol 177:510-515
12. Patel AR et al. (2004) Parasagittal biopsies add minimal information in repeat saturation prostate biopsy. Urology 63 87-89
13. Rabets JC et al. (2004) Prostate cancer detection with office based saturation biopsy in a repeat biopsy population. J Urol 172:94-97
14. Stewart CS et al. (2001) Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol 166: 86-91
15. Borboroglu PG et al. (2000) Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. J Urol 163: 158-162
16. Walz J et al. (2006) High incidence of prostate cancer detected by saturation biopsy after previous negative biopsy series. Eur Urol 50: 498-505
17. Fleshner N et al. (2002) Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases. Urology 80: 93-97
18. Partin AW et al. (1997) Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA 277: 1445-1451
19. Partin AW et al. (2001) Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 58: 843-848
20. Makarov DV et al. (2007) Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology 69: 1095-1101
21. Graefen M et al. (2001) A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: A tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 165: 857-863
22. Ohori M et al. (2004) Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: A nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 171: 1844-1849
23. Koh H et al. (2003) A nomogram to predict seminal vesicle invasion by the extent and location of cancer in systematic biopsy results. J Urol 170: 1203-1208
24. Gallina A et al. (2007) Development and split-sample validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 52: 98-105
25. Hutterer GC et al. (2007) The evolution of staging of lymph node metastases in clinically localized prostate cancer. EAU-EBU Update Series 5: 153-162
26. Cagiannos I et al. (2003) A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 170: 1798-1803
27. Briganti A et al. (2007) Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropublic prostatectomy. Urology 69: 147-151
28. Briganti A et al. (2006) Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 98: 788-793
29. DiMarco DS et al. (2005) The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate-cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 173: 1121-1125
30. Briganti A et al. (2006) Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol 49: 1019-1026
31. Briganti A et al. (2007) A nomogram for staging of exclusive nonobturator lymph node metastases in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 51: 112-119
32. Chun FK et al. (2006) Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer predictive nomogram and internal validation. BJU Int 98: 329-334
33. Chun FK et al. (2006) Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol 49: 820-826
34. Epstein JI et al. (1998) Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: prediction of insignificant disease using free/ total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings. J Urol 160: 2407-2411
35. Kattan MW et al. (2003) Counseling men with prostate cancer: A nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors. J Urol 170: 1792-1797
36. Steyerberg EW et al. (2007) Prediction of indolent prostate cancer: Validation and updating of a prognostic nomogram. J Urol 177: 107-112
37. Klotz L (2005) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: For whom? J Clin Oncol 23: 8165-8169
38. Kattan MW et al. (1998) A preoperative nomogram for diseasq recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 766-771
39. Kattan MW et al. (2000) Pretreatment nomogram for predicting the outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 18: 3352-3359
40. Kattan MW et al. (2001) Pretreatment nomogram for predicting freedom from recurrence after permanent prostate brachytherapy in prostate cancer. Urology 58: 393-399
41. [No authors listed] (1997) Consensus statement: Guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. American Society for Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37: 1035-1041
42. Graefen M et al. (2002) International validation of a preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 20: 3206-3212
43. Specht MC et al. (2005) Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: Clinicians versus nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 12: 654-659
44. Stephenson AJ et al. (2006) Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Natl Cancer Inst 98: 715-717