Orientation as a strategy of spatial reference

Studies in Language

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-136

  Terrill, Angela ^a   Burenhult, Niclas ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049128960     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.32.1.05ter     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Benjamin, Geoffrey. 1985. In the long term: Three themes in Malayan cultural ecology. Cultural values and human ecology in Southeast Asia, Karl L. Hutterer, Terry A. Rambo & George Lovelace (eds.), 219-278. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies.
2. Burenhult, Niclas. 2003. Attention, accessibility, and the addressee: The case of the Jahai demonstrative ton. Pragmatics 13: 363-379.
3. Burenhult, Niclas. 2005a. A grammar of Jahai. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
4. Burenhult, Niclas. 2005b. Landscape terms and toponyms in Jahai: A field report. Working Papers 51: 17-29. Lund: Department of Linguistics, Lund University.
5. Burenhult, Niclas. 2006. Body part terms in Jahai. Language Sciences 28: 162-180.
6. Burenhult, Niclas. Forthcoming a. Distance undone: New light on the Jahai multi-term demonstrative system. Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective. Michael Dunn, Sérgio Meira and David P. Wilkins (eds.).
7. Burenhult, Niclas. Forthcoming b. Spatial coordinate systems in demonstrative meaning.
8. Burenhult, Niclas & Angela Terrill. In preparation. Orientation and frames of reference typology.
9. CARG (Cognitive Anthropology Research Group). 1992. Space stimuli kit 1.2. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
10. Danziger, Eve. 1994. Out of sight, out of mind: Person, perception, and function in Mopan Maya spatial deixis. Linguistics 32: 885-907.
11. Danziger, Eve. 1996. Parts and their counterparts: Spatial and social relationships in Mopan Maya. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2(1): 67-82.
12. Danziger, Eve. 1997. La variation inter-langues dans l'encodage sémantique et cognitif des relations spatiales: Quelques réflexions sur les donnéeS DU maya mopan. Diversité des langues et représentations cognitives, Catherine Fuchs and Stéphane Robert (eds.), 58-80. Paris: Ophrys.
13. Danziger, Eve. 1999. Language space and sociolect: Cognitive correlates of gendered speech in Mopan Maya. Language diversity and cognitive representations, Catherine Fuchs and Stéphane Robert (eds.), 85-106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Danziger, Eve. 2004. Deixis, gesture and spatial frame of reference. Paper presented at the 2003 meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
15. Fortescue, Michael. 1988. Eskimo orientation systems. Meddelelser om Grønland: Man & Society 11: 3-30.
16. Haviland, John B. 1998. Guugu Yimithirr cardinal directions. Ethos 26(1): 7-24.
17. Hill, Deborah. 1997. Finding your way in Longgu: Geographical reference in a Solomon Islands language. Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages, Gunter Senft (ed.). 101-126. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Levinson, Stephen C. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence. Language and space, Paul Bloom, Mary Peterson, Lynne Nadel and Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), 109-169. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
19. Levinson, Stephen C. 1997. Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial description in Guugu Yimithirr. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(1): 98-131.
20. Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: CUP.
21. Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. The language of space in Yélî Dnye. Grammars of space, Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), 157-205.
22. Levinson, Stephen C., Sotaro Kita, Daniel B.M. Haun & Björn H. Rasch. 2002. Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition 84: 155-188.
23. Levinson, Stephen C. & David P. Wilkins (eds.). 2006. Grammars of space. Cambridge: CUP.
24. Li, Peggy & Lila Gleitman. 2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83: 265-294.
25. Palmer, Bill. 2002a. Absolute spatial reference and the grammaticalisation of perceptually salient phenomena. Representing space in Oceania: Culture in language and mind, Giovanni Bennardo (ed.), 107-157. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
26. Palmer, Bill. 2002b. Linguistic frame of reference reconsidered. Paper presented at Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society. Macquarie University.
27. Pederson, Eric. 2003. How many reference frames? Spatial Cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning, Christian Freksa, Wilfried Brauer, Christopher Habel & Karl F. Wender (eds.), 287-304. Berlin: Springer.
28. Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David P. Wilkins, Stephen C. Levinson, Sotaro Kita and Gunter Senft. 1998. Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74: 557-589.
29. Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2006. Sketch of a Jaminjung grammar of space. Grammars of space, Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), 63-114. Cambridge: CUP.
30. Seifart, Frank. 2003. Encoding shape: Formal means and semantic distinctions. Field research manual, 2003, Nick Enfield (ed.), 57-59. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
31. Senft, Gunter. 2001. Frames of spatial reference in Kilivila. Studies in Language 25(3): 521-555.
32. Talmy, Leonard. 1983. How language structures space. In: Spatial orientation: theory, research, and application, Herbert Pick & Linda Acredolo (eds.), 225-282. Plenum Press.
33. Terrill, Angela. 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. van der Sluys, Cornelia M. I. 1999. The Jahai of northern peninsular Malaysia. The Cambridge encyclopaedia of hunter-gatherers, Richard B. Lee & Richard Daly (eds.), 307-311. Cambridge: CUP.
35. Wassman, Jürg & Pierre R. Dasen. 1998. Balinese spatial orientation: Some empirical evidence for moderate linguistic relativity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (inc. Man) 4: 689-711.
36. Widlok, Thomas. 1997. Orientation in the wild: The shared cognition of Hai//om Bushpeople. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 3: 317-332.