Dynamical scaling and generalized Omori law

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 34, Issue 23, 2007, Pages

  Lippiello, E ^a   Bottiglieri, M ^a   Godano, Cataldo ^a   de Arcangelis, L ^a  

^a SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCALING LAWS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOGRAPHS; SEISMOLOGY;

AFTERSHOCKS; AFTERSHOCKS RATE; DYNAMIC SCALING; GENERALIZED OMORI LAW;

EARTHQUAKES;

AFTERSHOCK; EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION; POWER LAW;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 39049123217     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2007GL030963     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Båth, M. (1965), Lateral inhomogeneities in the upper mantle, Tectonophysics, 2, 483-514.
2. W.6.6), J. Geophys. Res., 112, B04310, doi:10.1029 /2006JB004629.
3. Felzer, K. R., R. E. Abercrombie, and G. Ekström (2004), A common origin for aftershocks, foreshocks and multiplets, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 88-98.
4. Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter (1944), Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185-188.
5. Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson (2005), Importance of small earthquakes for stress transfers and earthquake triggering, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B05S08, doi:10.1029/2004JB003286.
6. Kagan, Y. Y. (2004), Short-term properties of earthquake catalogs and models of earthquake source, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94, 1207-1228.
7. Lippiello, E., C. Godano, and L. de Arcangelis (2007), Dynamical scaling in branching models for seismicity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 098501
8. Lise, S., M. Paczuski, and A. L. Stella (2004), Scaling law for seismic hazard after a main shock, Condens. Matter, 0403037.
9. Lolli, B., and P. Gasperini (2006), Comparing different models of aftershock rate decay: The role of catalog incompleteness in the first times after mainshock, Tectonophysics, 423, 43-59.
10. Narteau, C., P. Shebalin, and M. Holschneider (2002), Temporal limits of the power law aftershock decay rate, J. Geophys. Res., 107(B12), 2359, dci:10.1029/2002JB001868.
11. Omori, F. (1894), On the after-shocks of earthquakes, J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo, 7, 111-200.
12. Peng, Z., J. E. Vidale, and H. Huston (2006), Anomalous early aftershock decay rate of the 2004 Mw6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake, Geophys. Rev. Lett., 33, L17307, doi:10.1029/2006GL026744.
13. Peng, Z., J. E. Vidale, M. Ishii, and A. Helmstetter (2007), Seismicity rate immediately before and after main shock rupture from high-frequency waveforms in Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B03306, doi: 10.1029/ 2006JB004386.
14. Shcherbakov, R., D. L. Turcotte, and J. B. Rundle (2004), A generalized Omori's law for earthquake aftershock decay, Geophys. Rev. Lett., 31, L11613, doi:10.1029/2004GL019808.
15. Shcherbakov, R., G. Yacovlev, D. L. Turcotte, and J. B. Rundle (2005a), Model for distribution of aftershocks interoccurrence times, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 218501.
16. Shcherbakov, R., D. L. Turcotte, and J. B. Rundle (2005b), Aftershock statistics, Pure Appl. Geophys., 162, 1051-1076.
17. Shcherbakov, R., D. L. Turcotte, and J. B. Rundle (2006), Scaling properties of the Parkfield aftershock sequence, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, S376-S384.