Computer Conversations and Writing Apprehension

Business Communication Quarterly

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 39-49

  Mabrito, Mark ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY CALUMET   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning styles; newsgroups; online communications behavior; writing apprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049111386     PISSN: 10805699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/108056990006300104     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Berg, Z., & Collins, M. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom in distance learning. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
2. Black, S.D., Levin, J.A., & Mehan, H. (1983). Real and non-real time interaction: Unraveling multiple threads of discourse. Discourse Processes, 6(1), 58-75.
3. Clifford, J. (1981). Composing in stages: The effects of a collaborative pedagogy. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 37-53.
4. Cooper, M.M., & Selfe, C.L. (1990). Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English, 52, 847-869.
5. Daiute, C. (1985). Writing and computers. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
6. Daiute, C. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 141-159.
7. Daly, J.A. (1977). The effects of writing apprehension on message encoding. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 566-572.
8. Daly, J.A. (1978). Writing apprehension and writing competency. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 10-14.
9. Daly, J.A. (1984). Putting the situation into writing research: State and disposition as parameters of writing apprehension. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 259-263). New York: Guilford.
10. Daly, J.A. & Miller, M.D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 242-249.
11. Fox, R.F. (1980). Treatment of writing apprehension and its effects on composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 39-49.
12. Hartman, R., Neuwirth, C.M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 79-113.
13. Hiltz, S.R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Jorn, L., Duin, A., & Wahlstrom, B. (1996). Designing and managing virtual learning Communities. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 39, 183-191.
15. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T.W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
16. Ku, L. (1996). Social and nonsocial uses of electronic messaging systems in organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 33, 297-326.
17. Mabrito, M. (1992). Computer-mediated communication and high-apprehensive writers: Rethinking the collaborative process. Bulletin of the Association of Business Communication, 55(4), 26-31.
18. Phinney, M. (1991). Word processing and writing apprehension in first and second language writers. Computers and Composition, 8, 509-532.
19. Rice, R.E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socio-emotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14, 85-105.
20. Spitzer, M. (1986). Writing style in computer conferences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 29(1), 19-22.
21. Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed), Culture of the Internet, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Yin, R. ( 1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.