A zone of overlap and hybridization between Allonemobius socius and a new Allonemobius sp.

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 30-39

  Traylor, Travis ^a   Birand, Ayşegül C ^a   Marshall, Jeremy L ^b   Howard, Daniel J ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Allonemobius; Conspecific sperm precedence; Ground cricket; Hybrid zone; Hybridization

Indexed keywords

CRICKET; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HYBRID ZONE; HYBRIDIZATION; NEW SPECIES; NICHE OVERLAP; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

NORTH AMERICA; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

ALLONEMOBIUS; ALLONEMOBIUS FASCIATUS; ALLONEMOBIUS SOCIUS; NEMOBIINAE;

EID: 39049110617     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[30:AZOOAH]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Britch, S. C., M. L. Cain, and D. J. Howard. 2001. Spatio-temporal dynamics of the Allonemobius fasciatus-A. socius mosaic hybrid zone: a 14-year perspective. Mol. Ecol. 10: 627-638.
2. Doherty, J. A., and D. J. Howard. 1996. Lack of preference for conspecific calling songs in female crickets. Anim. Behav. 51: 981-989.
3. Fuerst, P. A., R. Chakraborty, and M. Nei. 1977. Statistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations I. distribution of single locus heterozygosity. Genetics 86: 455-483.
4. Gregory, P. G., and D. J. Howard. 1994. A postinsemination barrier to fertilization isolates 2 closely related ground crickets. Evolution 48: 705-710.
5. Gregory, P. G., M. D. Remmenga, and D. J. Howard. 1998. Patterns of mating between two closely related ground crickets are not influenced by sympatry. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 87: 263-270.
6. Harrison, R. G. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process, pp. 69 -128. In D. J. Futuyma and J. Antonovics [eds]., Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, New York.
7. Harrison, R. G., and S. M. Bogdanowicz. 1997. Patterns of variation and linkage disequilibrium in a field cricket hybrid zone. Evolution 51: 493-505.
8. Hewitt, G. M. 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 247-276.
9. Hewitt, G. M. 2004. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359: 183-195.
10. Howard, D. J. 1983. Electrophoretic survey of eastern North American Allonemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): evolutionary relationships and the discovery of three new species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76: 1014-1021.
11. Howard, D. J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between 2 ground cricket species. Evolution 40: 34-43.
12. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: the origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis, pp. 46-69. In R. G. Harrison [ed.], Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Howard, D. J., and D. G. Furth. 1986. Review of the Allonemobius fasciatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) complex with the description of 2 new species separated by electrophoresis, songs, and morphometrics. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 472-481.
14. Howard, D. J., and G. L. Waring. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45: 1120-1135.
15. Howard, D. J., and P. G. Gregory. 1993. Post-insemination signaling systems and reinforcement. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 340: 231-236.
16. Howard, D. J., G. L. Waring, C. A. Tibbets, and P. G. Gregory. 1993. Survival of hybrids in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 47: 789-800.
17. Howard, D. J., P. G. Gregory, J. M. Chu, and M. L. Cain. 1998. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52: 511-516.
18. Howard, D. J., S. C. Britch, W. E. Braswell, and J. L. Marshall. 2004. Evolution in hybrid zones, pp. 297-314. In R. S. Singh and M. K. Uyenomaya [eds.], The evolution of population biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
19. Howard, D. J., J. L. Marshall, D. D. Hampton, S. C. Britch, M. L. Draney, J. M. Chu, and R. G. Cantrell. 2002. The genetics of reproductive isolation: a retrospective and prospective look with comments on ground crickets. Am. Nat. 159: S8-S21.
20. Huestis, D. L., and J. L. Marshall. 2006. Is natural selection a plausible explanation for the distribution of Idh-1 alleles in the cricket Allonemobius socius? Ecol. Entomol. 31: 91-98.
21. Jiggins, C. D., and J. Mallet. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 250-255.
22. Marshall, J. L. 2004. The Allonemobius-Wolbachia host-endosymbiont system: evidence for rapid speciation and against reproductive isolation driven by cytoplasmic incompatibility. Evolution 58: 2409-2425.
23. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Heredity 86: 248-249.
24. Remington, C. L. 1968. Suture zones of hybrid interaction between recently joined biotas. Evol. Biol. 2: 321-328.
25. Swenson, N. G., and D. J. Howard. 2004. Do suture zones exist? Evolution 58: 2391-2397.
26. Swenson, N. G., and D. J. Howard. 2005. Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones, and phylogeographic breaks in North America. Am. Nat. 166: 581-591.
27. Walker, T. J. 2007. Crickets, singing insects of North America. (http://buzz.ifas.ufl.edu/crickets.htm).
28. Weibel, A. C., and D. J. Howard. 2000. Discovery of new populations of striped ground crickets in Western North America: distribution, subdivision, and introduction detected by allozyme data. J. Entomol. Res. 2: 1-25.