Surgeon satisfaction agreement after total knee arthroplasty using a visual analogue scale: A single surgeon series

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 255-259

  Brokelman, R B G ^a   Van Loon, C J M ^a   Boog, G J T M ^a  

^a RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Interobserver agreement; Knee; Satisfaction; Visual analogue scale

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SURGEON; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT;

EID: 39049102385     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-006-0272-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bach CM, Nogler M, Steingruber IE, et al (2002) Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 399:184-196
2. Bellamy NW, Buchannan WW, Goldsmith CH, Cambell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC. J Rheumatol 15:1833-1840
3. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 306:307-310
4. Brokelman RB, van Loon CJ, Rijnberg WJ (2003) Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:495-498
5. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP (2001) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:740-747
6. Dolan P, Sutton M (1997) Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values. Soc Sci Med 44:1519-1530
7. Ewald FC (1989) The knee society knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9-12
8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14
9. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363-374
10. Martin SD, McManus JL, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (1997) Press-Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:603-614
11. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD (1993) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32:40-66
12. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE (1992) The MOS36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31:247-263
13. Robinson A, Dolan P, Williams A (1997) Valuing health status using VAS and TTO. Soc Sci Med 45:1289-1297
14. Roorda L, Jones C, Waltz M, et al (2004) Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritits waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 63:36-42
15. Ryd L, Karrholm J, Ahlvin P (1997) Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis: evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelop of bias. Acta Orthop Scand 68:41-45
16. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD (1998) Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:850-858
17. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473-483
18. Wright J, Ewald FC, Walker PS, et al (1990) Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1003-1009