How do elevated CO2 and O3 affect the interception and utilization of radiation by a soybean canopy?

Global Change Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 556-564

  Dermody, Orla ^a,c   Long, Stephen P ^a   McConnaughay, Kelly ^b   DeLucia, Evan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b BRADLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Pioneer Hi Bred Switzerland SA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Crop; Leaf area index; Light; Photosynthesis; Production; SoyFACE

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CANOPY; CARBON DIOXIDE; FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; GLOBAL CHANGE; LEAF AREA INDEX; LIGHT; OZONE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SOYBEAN;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 38949194180     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01502.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ahl DE, Gower ST, Mackay DS, Burrows SN, Norman JM, Diak GR (2004) Heterogeneity of light use efficiency in a northern Wisconsin forest: implications for modeling net primary production with remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93, 168-178.
2. 2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield. Global Change Biology, 8, 695-709.
3. Allen LH (1990) Plant responses to rising carbon dioxide and potential interactions with air pollutants. Journal of Environmental Quality, 19, 15-34.
4. 2 in the field. New Phytologist, 128, 443-450.
5. 2 and nitrogen availability have interactive effects on canopy carbon gain in rice. New Phytologist, 161, 459-471.
6. Ashmore MR (2005) Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant, Cell and Environment, 28, 949-964.
7. Bartelink HH, Kramer K, Mohren GMJ (1997) Applicability of the radiation-use efficiency concept for simulating growth of forest stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 88, 169-179.
8. 2] enrichment (FACE) stimulates photosynthesis while decreasing in vivo Rubisco capacity. Planta, 220, 434-446.
9. 2 and land use change. Global Change Biology, 10, 1884-1898.
10. 2 in soybean. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 2139-2151.
11. Campbell GS, Norman JM (1989) The description and measurement of plant canopy structure. In: Plant Canopies: Their Growth Form and Function (eds Russell G, Marshall B, Jarvis PG), pp. 1-19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. 2. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 771-781.
13. Changnon SA, Changnon D (2005) Importance of sky conditions on the record 2004 midwestern crop yields. Physical Geography, 26, 99-111.
14. Chen DX, Coughenour MB (2004) Photosynthesis, transpiration, and primary productivity: Scaling up from leaves to canopies and regions using process models and remotely sensed data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18, 1-17.
15. Cowling SA, Field CB (2003) Environmental control of leaf area production: Implications for vegetation and land-surface modeling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1-14.
16. Daughtry CST, Gallo KP, Goward SN, Prince SD, Kustas WP (1992) Spectral estimates of absorbed radiation and phytomass production in corn and soybean canopies. Remote Sensing of Environment, 39, 141-152.
17. DeLucia EH, George K, Hamilton JG (2002) Radiation-use efficiency of a forest exposed to elevated concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Tree Physiology, 22, 1003-1010.
18. 2 or ozone affect the leaf-area index of soybean when applied independently? New Phytologist, 169, 145-155.
19. 2 increases biomass and tuber yield in potato even at high ozone concentrations. New Phytologist, 149, 265-274.
20. 2. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 48, 609-639.
21. 3 enriched atmospheres. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 479-495.
22. 2: How important is leaf area index? Annals of Botany, 93, 619-627.
23. 2 and ozone. European Journal of Agronomy, 10, 171-184.
24. 2 and drought on wheat: Testing crop simulation models for different experimental and climatic conditions. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 93, 249-266.
25. 2 studies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 48, 307-313.
26. Forseth IN, Norman JM (1993) Modelling of solar irradiance, leaf energy budget and canopy photosynthesis. In: Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment, a Field and Laboratory Manual (eds Hall DO, Scurlock JMO, Bolhar-Nordenkampf HR, Leegood RC, Long SP), pp. 207-219. Chapman and Hall, London.
27. 2, ozone and global climate change. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 97, 1-20.
28. Heagle AS, Miller JE, Pursley WA (2003) Growth and yield responses of potato to mixtures of carbon dioxide and ozone. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1603-1610.
29. 2]. Global Change Biology, 7, 75-91.
30. Isebrands JG, McDonald EP, Kruger E et al. (2001) Growth responses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting elevated carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental Pollution, 115, 359-371.
31. Kiniry JR, Landivar JA, Witt M, Gerik TJ, Cavero J, Wade LJ (1998) Radiation-use efficiency response to vapor pressure deficit for maize and sorghum. Field Crops Research, 56, 265-270.
32. Kiniry JR, Simpson CE, Schubert AM, Reed JD (2005) Peanut leaf area index, light interception, radiation use efficiency, and harvest index at three sites in Texas. Field Crops Research, 91, 297-306.
33. Lindquist JL, Arkebauer TJ, Walters DT, Cassman KG, Dobermann A (2005) Maize radiation use efficiency under optimal growth conditions. Agronomy Journal, 97, 72-78.
34. 2 concentrations. Science, 312, 1918-1921.
35. Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR (2004) Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: Plants FACE the future. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 591-628.
36. 3 sedge, Scirpus olneyi. Plant Physiology, 96, 221-226.
37. 2 concentration. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 38, 131-143.
38. 2 enrichment on growth and daily radiation use efficiency of wheat in relation to temperature and growth stage. European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 411-425.
39. 2 concentration: Ozone exclusion and detoxification. New Phytologist, 137, 275-284.
40. 3 damage to photosynthetic tissues of field-grown wheat. New Phytologist, 146, 427-435.
41. Medlyn B, Barrett D, Landsberg J, Sands P, Clement R (2003) Conversion of canopy intercepted radiation to photosynthate: Review of modelling approaches for regional scales. Functional Plant Biology, 30, 153-169.
42. 2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: The POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytologist, 150, 465-476.
43. Miller P, McBride J (1999) Oxidant Air Pollution Impacts in the Montane Forests of Southern California; the San Bernadino Case Study. Springer Verlag, New York.
44. Monteith JL (1972) Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 9, 747-766.
45. Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-biological sciences, 281, 277-294.
46. Morgan PB, Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2003) How does elevated ozone impact soybean? A meta-analysis of photosynthesis, growth and yield. Plant, Cell and Environment, 26, 1317-1328.
47. 2] elevation. Global Change Biology, 11, 1856-1865.
48. Morgan PB, Mies TA, Bollero GA, Nelson RL, Long SP (2006) Season-long elevation of ozone concentration to projected 2050 levels under fully open-air conditions substantially decreases the growth and production of soybean. New Phytologist, 170, 333-343.
49. Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Pengelly BC (1993) Radiation-use efficiency of soybean, mungbean and cowpea under different environmental conditions. Field Crops Research, 32, 1-16.
50. Murphy JJ, Delucchi MA, McCubbin DR, Kim HJ (1999) The cost of crop damage caused by ozone air pollution from motor vehicles. Journal of Environmental Management, 55, 273-289.
51. 2 use in 1990 and 1991. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 70, 31-48.
52. Nouvellon Y, Seen DL, Rambal S, Begue A, Moran MS, Kerr Y, Qi JG (2000) Time course of radiation use efficiency in a shortgrass ecosystem: consequences for remotely sensed estimation of primary production. Remote Sensing of Environment, 71, 43-55.
53. Prather M, Ehhalt D, Dentener F et al. (2001) Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases. In: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Houghton JT, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linder PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA), pp. 183-240. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
54. Prentice IC, Farquhar GD, Fasham MJR et al. (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Houghton JT, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linder PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA), pp. 241-280. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
55. Rao MV, Hale BA, Ormrod DP (1995) Amelioration of ozone-induced oxidative damage in wheat plants grown under high carbon dioxide-role of antioxidant enzymes. Plant Physiology, 109, 421-432.
56. 2 assimilation in soybean (Glycine max). Journal of Experimental Botany, 49, 885-895.
57. Richter GM, Semenov MA (2005) Modelling impacts of climate change on wheat yields in England and Wales - assessing drought risks. Agricultural Systems, 84, 77-97.
58. 3 Concentrations in FACE Experiments. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
59. Rogers A, Allen DJ, Davey PA et al. (2004) Leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate dynamics of soybeans grown throughout their life-cycle under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 449-458.
60. 2 enrichment. Plant Physiology, 118, 683-689.
61. Rudorff BFT, Mulchi CL, Daughtry CST, Lee EH (1996) Growth, radiation use efficiency, and canopy reflectance of wheat and corn grown under elevated ozone and carbon dioxide atmospheres. Remote Sensing of Environment, 55, 163-173.
62. Sandermann JH, Ernst D, Heller W, Langebartels C (1998) Ozone: An abiotic elicitor of plant defense reactions. Trends in Plant Science, 3, 47-50.
63. Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (1999) Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy, 65, 215-265.
64. Stitt M, Krapp A (1999) The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: The physiological and molecular background. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22, 583-621.
65. Turner DP, Gower ST, Cohen WB, Gregory M, Maiersperger TK (2002) Effects of spatial variability in light use efficiency on satellite-based NPP monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 397-405.
66. 3 on light-use efficiency and growth of crops. Ecological Modelling, 179, 39-60.
67. Weerakoon WMW, Ingram KT, Moss DN (2000) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and fertilizer nitrogen effects on radiation interception by rice. Plant and Soil, 220, 99-106.