The burden of a caesarean section refusal in a developing country setting [5]

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 540-

  Oboh, A E ^a   Wokoma, T ^a  

^a LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LETTER; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MYOMECTOMY; OBSTETRIC CARE; PATERNALISM; PATIENT COUNSELING; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT REFUSAL; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; NIGERIA; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PREGNANCY; REFUSAL TO TREAT; TREATMENT REFUSAL; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 38949184210     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01635.x     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Chigbu CO, Iloabuchi GC. The burden of a caesarean section refusal in a developing country setting. BJOG 2007 114 : 1261 5.
2. Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Diaz F, Brar HS, Rodriguez MH. Twice a caesarean, always a caesarean? Obstet Gynecol 1989 73 : 161 5
3. Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E, Stamilio DM, Ratcliffe S, Stevens E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 192 : 1223 8 discussion 1228-9.