A practical prioritization by multi-level group decision support

Central European Journal of Operations Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-15

  Mezey, Gyula ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF PUBLIC SERVICE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Capability based planning; Multiobjective group decision making; Project selection; Resource allocation

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949182955     PISSN: 1435246X     EISSN: 16139178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10100-007-0040-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allen P (1992a) Situational Force Scoring: accounting for combined arms effects in aggregate combat models, RAND-Note. RAND, Santa Monica
2. Allen P (1992b) A new RSAS (RAND Strategy Assessment System) ground force scoring system (replacing WEI/WUV system), Appendix E. RAND, Santa Monica
3. Anderson LB, Miercroft FA (1995) On weapons scores and force strengths. In: Bracken J, Kress M, Rosenthal RE(eds) Warfare modeling. MORS John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 229-249
4. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Management models and industrial applications of LP, vol 1-2. Wiley, New York, pp 215-223
5. Dibb P (1992) cited in Norazman BMN (2000) The modelling of defence structure for long-term planning under financial constraint: a complete Army restructuring process for a Third World Country. Ph.D. thesis, RMCS Cranfield
6. Dupuy TN (1987) Understanding war. Paragon House, Minnesota
7. Hillestad RJ, Juncosa ML (1995) Cutting some trees to see the forest: on aggregation and disaggregation in combat models. In: Bracken J, Kress M, Rosenthal RE(eds) Warfare modeling. MORS John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 37-62
8. Hines J (1990) Calculating war, calculating peace: Soviet military determinants of sufficiency in Europe. In: Huber R(eds) Military stability. Nomos Verlagsgesselshaft, Baden-Baden
9. Kim KS (2001) Decision support for prioritising defence procurement requirements of three armed services with using managements science methodologies. MDA dissertation, Cranfield University
10. Lewis L, Roll CR (1993) Strategy-to-tasks: a methodology for resource allocation and management. JUORS, Tokyo; RAND, Santa Monica
11. Norazman BMN (2000) The modelling of defence structure for long-term planning under financial constraint: a complete Army restructuring process for a Third World Country. Ph.D. thesis, Chapter 7, RMCS Cranfield
12. Stummer Ch, Vetschera R (2003) Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection. Cent Eur J Oper Res 11(3): 260
13. Szalay SP (2001a) The strategy-to-task technique applied to the analysis of British military doctrine, RMCS MSc Dissertation, p 35
14. Szalay SP (2001b) The strategy-to-task technique applied to the analysis of British military doctrine, RMCS MSc Dissertation, p 27
15. US Army Concepts Analysis Agency (1979) WEI/WUV III
16. Vance SM (1993) QFD 'quicksand'. In: Proceedings of 61st MORSS, p 218