The response of two remote, temperate lakes to changes in atmospheric mercury deposition, sulfate, and the water cycle

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 100-116

  Watras, C J ^a   Morrison, K A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; LACUSTRINE ENVIRONMENT; MERCURY (ELEMENT); METHYLATION; METHYLMERCURY; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; SULFATE; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT; WATER CHEMISTRY; WETLAND;

EID: 38949172155     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F07-159     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Attig, J.W. 1985. Pleistocene geology of Vilas County, Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geologic and Natural History Survey, Information Circular No. 50.
2. Babiarz, C.L., Hurley, J.P., Benoit, J.M., Shafer, M.M., Andren, A.W., and Webb, D.A. 1998. Seasonal influences on partitioning and transport of total and methylmercury in rivers from contrasting watersheds. Biogeochemistry, 41: 237-257.
3. Baeyens, W., Ebinghaus, R., and Vasiliev, O. (Editors). 1996. Global and regional mercury cycles: sources, fluxes and mass balances. NATO ASI Series 2. Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
4. Baker, L.A., Pollman, C.D., and Eilers, J.M. 1988. Internal alkalinity generation and geochemical controls of Florida softwater lake chemistry. Water Resour. Res. 24: 1069-1082.
5. Baker, L.A., Engstrom, D.R., and Brezonik, P.L. 1992. Recent sulfur enrichment in the sediments of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 689-702.
6. Balogh, S.J., Nollet, Y.H., and Offerman, H.J. 2005. A comparison of total mercury and methylmercury export from various Minnesota watersheds. Sci. Total Environ. 340: 261-270.
7. Bishop, K.H., and Lee, Y.-H. 1997. Catchments as a source of mercury/methylmercury in boreal surface waters. In Mercury and its effects on environment and biology. Edited by A. Sigel and H. Sigel. Marall Dekker, New York. pp. 113-130.
8. Bloom, N.S., and Watras, C.J. 1989. Observations of methylmercury in precipitation. Sci. Total Environ. 87/88: 199-207.
9. Branfireun, B.A., and Roulet, N.T. 2002. Controls on the fate and transport of methylmercury in a boreal headwater catchment, northwestern Ontario, Canada. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 6(4): 785-794.
10. Branfireun, B.A., Heyes, A., and Roulet, N.T. 1996. Hydrology and methylmercury dynamics of a Precambrian headwater peatland. Water Resour. Res. 32(6): 1785-1794.
11. Branfireun, B.A., Roulet, N.T., Kelly, C.A., and Rudd, J.W.M. 1999. In situ sulphate stimulation of mercury methylation in a boreal peatland: toward a link between acid rain and methylmercury contamination in remote environments. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 13(3): 743-750.
12. Brezonik, P.L., Eaton, J.G., Frost, T.M., Garrison, P.J., Kratz, T.K., Mach, C.E., McCormick, J.H., Perry, J.A., Rose, W.A., Sampson, C.J., Shelley, B.C.L., Swenson, W.A., and Webster, K.E. 1993. Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin: chemical and biological changes over the pH range 6.1 to 4.7. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 1101-1121.
13. Campbell, P.G.C., Twiss, M.R., and Wilkinson, K.J. 1997. Accumulation of natural organic matter on the surfaces of living cells: implications for the interaction of toxic solutes with aquatic biota. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 2543-2554.
14. Devito, K.J., Hill, A.R., and Dillon, P.J. 1999. Episodic sulfate export from wetlands in acidified headwater catchments: prediction at the landscape scale. Biogeochemistry, 44: 187-203.
15. Dommergue, A., Ferrari, C., Poissant, L., Gauchard, P.-A., and Boutron, C.F. 2003. Diurnal cycles of gaseous mercury within the snowpack at Kuujjuarapik/Whapmagoostui, Québec, Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37: 3289-3297.
16. Driscoll, C.T., Holsapple, J., Schofield, C.L., and Munson, R. 1998. The chemistry and transport of mercury in a small wetland in the Adirondack region of New York, USA. Biogeochemistry, 40: 137-146.
17. Eckley, C.S., and Hintelmann, H. 2006. Determination of mercury methylation potentials in the water column of lakes across Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 368: 111-125.
18. Eckley, C.S., Watras, C.J., Hintelmann, H., Morrison, K., Kent, A., and Regnell, O. 2005. Mercury methylation in the hypolimnetic waters of lakes with and without connection to wetlands in northern Wisconsin. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 400-411.
19. Engstrom, D.R., Swain, E.B., Henning, T.A., Brigham, M.E., and Brezonik, P.L. 1994. Atmospheric mercury deposition to lakes and watersheds: a quantitative reconstruction from multiple sediment cores. In Environmental chemistry of lakes and reservoirs. Advances in Chemistry Series 237. Edited by L.A. Baker. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. pp. 33-66.
20. Fitzgerald, W.F., Mason, R.P., and Vandal, G.M. 1991. Atmospheric cycling and air-water exchange of mercury over mid-continental lacustrine regions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 56: 745-768.
21. Fitzgerald, W.F., Engstrom, D.R., Mason, R.P., and Nater, E.A. 1998. The case for atmospheric mercury contamination in remote areas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32(1): 1-7.
22. Freeze, R.A., and Cherry, J.A. 1979. Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
23. Frost, T.M., Fischer, J.M., Brezonik, P.L., Gonzalez, M.J., Kratz, T.K., Watras, C.J., and Webster, K.E. 2006. The experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake. In Long-term dynamics of lakes in the landscape. Edited by J.J. Magnuson, T.K. Kratz, and B.J. Benson. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 168-186.
24. Galloway, M.E., and Branfireun, B.A. 2004. Mercury dynamics of a temperate forested wetland. Sci. Total Environ. 325: 239-254.
25. Gilmour, C.C., Henry, E.A., and Mitchell, R. 1992. Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26: 2281-2287.
26. Grigal, D.F. 2002. Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review. Environ. Rev. 10: 1-39.
27. Grigal, D.F. 2003. Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: a review. J. Environ. Qual. 32: 393-405.
28. Haitzer, M., Aiken, G.R., and Ryan, J.N. 2003. Binding of mercury (II) to aquatic humic substances: influence of pH and source humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(11): 2436-2441.
29. Harmon, S.M., King, J.K., Gladden, J.B., Chandler, G.T., and Newman, L.A. 2004. Methylmercury formation in a wetland mesocosm amended with sulfate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(2): 650-656.
30. Hintelmann, H., Harris, R., Heyes, A., Hurley, J.P., Kelly, C.A., Krabbenhoft, D.P., Lindberg, S.E., Rudd, J.W.M., Scott, K.J., and St. Louis, V.L. 2002. Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36(23): 503495040.
31. Horsley & Witten Inc. 2003. Devils Lake summary report: water years 1996 to 2002. Horsley & Witten Inc., 90 Route 6A, Sandwich, MA 02563, USA.
32. Hrabik, T.R., and Watras, C.J. 2002. Recent declines in mercury concentration in a freshwater fishery: isolating the effects of deacidification and decreased atmospheric mercury deposition in Little Rock Lake. Sci. Total Environ. 297: 229-237.
33. Hudson, R.J.M., Gherini, S.A., Watras, C.J., and Porcella, D.B. 1994. Modeling the biogeochemical cycling of mercury in lakes: the Mercury Cycling Model (MCM) and its application to the MTL study lakes. In Mercury pollution: integration and synthesis. Edited by C.J. Watras and J.W. Huckabee. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan. pp. 473-526.
34. Hurley, J.P., Watras, C.J., and Bloom, N.S. 1991. Mercury cycling in a northern Wisconsin seepage lake: the role of particulate matter in vertical transport. Water Air Soil Pollut. 56: 543-552.
35. Jenson, A., and Iverfeldt, Å. 1994. Atmospheric bulk deposition of mercury to the southern Baltic Sea. In Mercury pollution: integration and synthesis. Edited by C.J. Watras and J.W. Huckabee. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan. pp. 221-229.
36. Jeremiason, J.D., Engstrom, D.R., Swain, E.B., Nater, E.A., Johnson, B.M., Almendinger, J.E., Monson, B.A., and Kolka, R.K. 2006. Sulfate addition increases methylmercury production in an experimental wetland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(12): 3800-3806.
37. Kelly, C.A., Rudd, J.W.M., Bodaly, R.A., Roulet, N.P., St. Louis, V.L., Heyes, A., Moore, T.R., Schiff, S., Aravena, R., Scott, K.J., Dyck, B., Harris, R., Warner, B., and Edwards, G. 1997. Increases in fluxes of greenhouse gases and methyl mercury following flooding of an experimental reservoir. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31: 1334-1344.
38. Kenoyer, G.J., and Anderson, M.P. 1989. Groundwater's dynamic role in regulating acidity and chemistry in a precipitation-dominated lake. J. Hydrol. 109: 287-309.
39. Kent, A.D., Watras, C.J., Eckley, C., Regnell, O., Hintelmann, H., and McMahon, K.D. 2006. Microbial community structure is correlated with mercury methylation in northern Wisconsin lakes. In Eighth International Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant, 6-11 August 2006, Madison, Wisconsin. UW Sea Grant Program, Madison, Wis. S-1490.
40. Kolka, R.K., Grigal, D.F., Nater, E.A., and Verry, E.S. 2001. Hydrologic cycling of mercury and organic carbon in a forested upland-bog watershed. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65: 897-905.
41. Krabbenhoft, D.P., and Babiarz, C.L. 1992. The role of groundwater transport in aquatic mercury cycling. Water Resour. Res. 28(12): 3119-3128.
42. Lee, Y.H., Bishop, K.H., Munthe, J., Iverfeldt, Å., Verta, M., Parkman, H., and Hultberg, H. 1998. An examination of current Hg deposition and export in Fenno-Scandian catchments. Biogeochemistry, 40: 125-135.
43. Lee, Y.H., Bishop, K., and Munthe, J. 2000. Do concepts about catchment cycling of methylmercury and mercury in boreal catchments stand the test of time? Six years of atmospheric inputs and runoff export at Svartberget, northern Sweden. Sci. Total Environ. 260: 11-20.
44. Lindqvist, O. 1991. Mercury in the Swedish environment - recent research on causes, consequences and corrective measures. Water Air Soil Pollut. 55: 1-261.
45. Magnuson, J.J., Kratz, T.K., and Benson, B.J. (Editors). 2006. Long-term dynamics of lakes in the landscape. Oxford University Press, New York.
46. Mason, R.P., Abbott, M.L., Bodaly, R.A., Bullock, O.R., Driscoll, C.T., Evers, D., Lindberg, S.E., Murray, M., and Swain, E.B. 2005. Monitoring the response to changing mercury deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(1): 14A-24A.
47. Matilainen, T., Verta, M., Korhornen, H., Uusi-Rauva, A., and Neime, M. 2001. Behavior of mercury in soil profiles. Water Air Soil Pollut. 125: 105-119.
48. Meili, M. 1991. Mercury in boreal forest lake ecosystems. PhD. thesis, Uppsala Universitat, Uppsala, Sweden.
49. Meili, M., Bishop, K., Bringmark, L., Johansson, K., Munthe, J., Sverdrup, H., and de Vries, W. 2003. Critical levels of atmospheric pollution: criteria and concepts for operational modelling of mercury in forest and lake ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 304: 83-106.
50. Mierle, G. 1990. Aqueous inputs of mercury to Precambrian shield lakes in Ontario. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9: 843-851.
51. Miles, C.J., Moye, H.A., Phlips, E.J., and Sargent, B. 2001. Partitioning of monomethylmercury between freshwater algae and water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35(21): 4277-4282.
52. Miretzky, P., Bisinoti, M.C., and Jardim, W.F. 2005. Sorption of mercury (II) in Amazon soils from column studies. Chemosphere, 60: 1583-1589.
53. Moore, T.R., and Dalva, M. 2001. Some controls on the release of dissolved organic carbon by plant tissues and soils. Soil Sci. 166(1): 38-47.
54. Morrison, K.A., and Watras, C.J. 1999. Mercury and methyl mercury in freshwater seston: direct determination at picogram per litre levels by dual filtration. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56(5): 760-766.
55. Morrison, K.A., Kuhn, E.S., and Watras, C.J. 1995. Comparison of three methods of estimating atmospheric mercury deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29(3): 571-576.
56. Moye, H.A., Miles, C.J., Phlips, E.J., Sargent, B., and Merritt, K.K. 2003. Kinetics and uptake mechanisms for monomethyl-mercury between freshwater algae and water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36: 3550-3555.
57. Nater, E.A., and Grigal, D.F. 1992. Regional trends in mercury deposition across the Great Lakes states, north central USA. Nature (London), 358: 139-141.
58. Pickhardt, P.C., and Fisher, N.S. 2007. Accumulation of inorganic and methylmercury by freshwater phytoplankton in two contrasting water bodies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41: 125-131.
59. Porvari, P., Verta, M., Munthe, J., and Haapanen, M. 2003. Forestry practices increase mercury and methylmercury output from boreal forest catchments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37: 2389-2393.
60. Rose, W.J. 1993. Hydrology of Little Rock Lake in Vilas County, north central Wisconsin. US Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin, Water Resources Investigations Report No. 93-4139.
61. Sass, G.G., Kitchell, J.F., Carpenter, S.R., Hrabik, T.R., Marburg, A.E., and Turner, M.G. 2006. Fish community response to a whole-lake removal of coarse woody habitat. Fisheries, 31(7): 321-330.
62. Sherman, L.A., Brezonik, P.L., Baker, L.A., and Weir, E.P. 1994. Sediment porewater dynamics of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 1155-1171.
63. Skyllberg, U., Qian, J., Frech, W., Xia, K., and Bleam, W.F. 2003. Distribution of mercury, methyl mercury and organic sulphur species in soil, soil solution and streams of a boreal forest catchment. Biogeochemistry, 64: 53-76.
64. St. Louis, V.L., Rudd, J.W.M., Kelly, C.A., Beaty, K.G., Flett, R.J., and Roulet, N.T. 1996. Production and loss of methylmercury and loss of total mercury from boreal forest catchments containing different types of wetlands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30(9): 2719-2729.
65. Ullrich, S.M., Tanton, T.W., and Abdrashitova, S.A. 2001. Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31(3): 241-293.
66. Urban, N.R., and Monte, A.E. 2001. Sulfur burial and loss from the sediments of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 1347-1355.
67. Urban, N.R., Sampson, C.J., Brezonik, P.L., and Baker, L.A. 2001. Sulfur cycling in the water column of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin. Biogeochemistry, 52: 41-77.
68. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Method 1669: sampling ambient water for trace metals at EPA water quality criteria levels (EPA 821-R-95-034). Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., EPA 821-R-95-034.
69. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Method 1630: methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and CVAFS (EPA-821-R01-020). Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., EPA-821-R01-020.
70. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Method 1631, revision E: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (EPA 821-R-02-019). Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., EPA 821-R-02-019.
71. Vandal, G.M., Mason, R.P., and Fitzgerald, W.F. 1991. Cycling of volatile mercury in temperate lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 56: 791-803.
72. Verta, M. 1990. Mercury in Finnish forest lakes and reservoirs: anthropogenic contribution to the load and accumulation in fish. National Board of Waters and the Environment, Helsinki, Finland.
73. Watras, C.J., Bloom, N.S., Hudson, R.J.M., Gherini, S., Munson, R., Claas, S.A., Morrison, K.A., Hurley, J., Wiener, J.G., Fitzgerald, W.F., Mason, R., Vandal, G., Powell, D., Rada, R., Rislov, L., Winfrey, M., Elder, J., Krabbenhoft, D., Andren, A.W., Babiarz, C., Porcella, D.B., and Huckabee, J.W. 1994. Sources and fates of mercury and methylmercury in Wisconsin lakes. In Mercury pollution: integration and synthesis. Edited by C.J. Watras and J.W. Huckabee. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan. pp. 153-177.
74. Watras, C.J., Morrison, K.A., Hudson, R.J.M., Frost, T.M., and Kratz, T.K. 2000. Decreasing mercury in northern Wisconsin: temporal patterns in bulk precipitation and a precipitation-dominated lake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34(19): 4051-4057.
75. Watras, C.J., Morrison, K.A., and Kratz, T.K. 2002. Seasonal enrichment and depletion of Hg and SO4 in Little Rock Lake: relationship to seasonal changes in atmospheric deposition. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 1660-1667.
76. Watras, C.J., Morrison, K.A., Kent, A., Price, N., Regnell, O., Eckley, C., Hintelmann, H., and Hubacher, T. 2005. Sources of methylmercury to a wetland-dominated lake in northern Wisconsin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(13): 4747-4758.
77. Watras, C.J., Morrison, K.A., Regnell, O., and Kratz, T.K. 2006. The methylmercury cycle in Little Rock Lake during experimental acidification and recovery. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51(1): 257-270.
78. Webster, K.E., Kratz, T.K., Bowser, C.J., and Magnuson, J.J. 1996. The influence of landscape position on lake chemical responses to drought in northern Wisconsin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41(5): 977-984.
79. Wentz, D.A., Rose, W.J., and Webster, K.E. 1995. Long-term hydrologic and biogeochemical responses of a soft water seepage lake in north central Wisconsin. Wat. Resour. Res. 31(1): 199-212.