Bite-management considerations for the restorative dentist

Dentistry Today

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 108-113

  Chan, Clayton A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALOCCLUSION; MASTICATORY MUSCLE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; CROWNS; DENTAL ARTICULATORS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL OCCLUSION, CENTRIC; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALOCCLUSION; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; PROPRIOCEPTION; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 38949133057     PISSN: 87502186     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Christensen GJ. Making fixed prostheses that are not too high. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:96-98.
2. Chan CA, Thomas NT. Clinical and scientific validation for optimizing the neuromuscular trajectory using the Chan protocol. International College of Cranio-Mandibular Orthopedics Anthology. Volume VII. 2005:2-16.
3. The Council on Dental Care of American Dental Association (ADA). Guidelines for TMJ Treatment (2004). http://www.cda.org/library/ cda_member/pollcy/quality/tmj_mpd.pdf. Accessed: December 3, 2007.
4. Broadbent JM. TMJ in your practice. Fund Orthod. 2006;23:38-45.
5. Simmons HC 3rd. Guidelines for anterior repositioning appliance therapy for the management of craniofacial pain and TMD. Funct Orthod. 2006;23:22-31
6. [republished from Cranio. 2005;23:300-305].
7. Cooper BC. The role of bioelectronic instrumentation in the documentation and management of temporo-mandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:91-100.
8. Shillingburg HT Jr, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1981:259-267.
9. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Kinderknecht KE. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:265-270.
10. Campos AA, Nathanson D. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:456-461.
11. Keyf F, Altunsoy S. Compressive strength of interocclusal recording materials. Braz Dent J. 2001;12:43-46.
12. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, et al. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting. J Prosthodont. 2004;13:233-237.
13. Breeding LC, Dixon DL. Com-pression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:876-878.
14. Small BW. Centric relation bite registration. Gen Dent. 2006;54:10-11.
15. Chan CA. Multi-dimensional diagnosis and treatment to avoid orthodontic and surgical pitfalls. J Am Orthodontic Soc. 2006;6:18-28.
16. Baker L. Tension headache, or not? Study shows pain may be due to TMJD. [Study by Ohrbach R., et al]. Buffalo Physician. Autumn, 2006; 41:32.
17. Garry JF. Telephone communication. September 29, 2002.
18. Riis D, Giddon DB. Interdental discrimination of small thickness differences. J Prosthet Dent. 1970;24:324-334.
19. Miller MB. LuxaBite: bite registration material. In: Reality. Volume 20, Houston, TX: Reality Pub Co; 2006:31-39.