Choquet-stieltjes integral as a tool for decision modeling

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 115-127

  Narukawa, Yasuo ^a   Murofushi, Toshiaki ^b  

^a Toho Gakuen   (Japan)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CHOQUET INTEGRAL;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 38949108921     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.20260     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1944.
2. Allais M. Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 1953; 21:503-546.
3. Ellsberg D. Risk ambiguity and the Savage axioms. QJ Econ 1961;75:643-669.
4. Quiggin J. A Theory of anticipated utility. J Econ Behav Organ 1982;3:323-343.
5. Schmeidler D. Integral representation without additivity. Proc Am Math Soc 1986;97:253-261.
6. Chateauneuf A. Modeling attitudes towards uncertainty and risk through the use of Choquet integral. Ann Oper Res 1994;52:3-20.
7. Narukawa Y, Murofushi T, Sugeno M. Integral representations and decision theory. In Bouchon-Meunier B, Gutierrez-Rios J, Magdalena L, Yager RR, Physica-Verlag, 2002. Technologies for constructing intelligent systems, 1: Tasks. Studies in Fuzziness Soft Computing vol 89. Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag, 2002;153-166.
8. Sugeno M. Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications. Doctoral Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 1974.
9. Choquet G. Theory of capacities. Ann Inst Fourier Grenoble 1955;5:131-295.
10. Murofushi T, Sugeno M. An interpretation of fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to a fuzzy measure. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1989;29:201-227.
11. van der Waerden BL. Mathematical statistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1969.
12. Dellacherie C. Quelques commentaires sur les prolongements de capacités. Séminaire de Probabilités 1969/1970, Strasbourg. Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 191, Berlin: Springer; 1971. pp 77-81.
13. Narukawa Y, Murofushi T. Choquet integral representation and preference. In Proc. 9th Int Conf on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems (IPMU 2002), Annecy, France; 2002. pp 747-753.
14. Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 1989;57:517-587.
15. Riesz F, Nagy B. Functional analysis. New York: Frederick Unger; 1955.
16. Aczel J. Lectures on functional equations and their applications, New York: Academic Press; 1996.