Song structure and repertoire sharing in the Tawny Pipit Anthus campestris in Poland

Acta Ornithologica

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 157-165

  Osiejuk, Tomasz S ^a   Grzybek, Jerzy ^a   Tryjanowski, Piotr ^a  

^a ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Anthus campestris; Repertoire sharing; Small repertoire size; Song rate; Song structure; Tawny Pipit

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BIRD; SIZE STRUCTURE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SONG; STEREOTYPIC BEHAVIOR;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; POLAND; WIELKOPOLSKA;

ANTHUS CAMPESTRIS;

EID: 38949104085     PISSN: 00016454     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3161/068.042.0210     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alström P., Mild K. 2003. Pipits and wagtails of Europe, Asia and North America. Helm, London.
2. Baker M. C., Baker M. S. A., Tilghman L. M. 2006. Differing effects of isolation on evolution of bird songs examples from an island-mainland comparison of three species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 89: 331-342.
3. Beecher M. D., Campbell S. E., Burt J. M., Hill C. E., Nordby J. C. 2000. Song-type matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 59: 21-27.
4. Bergmann H.-H., Helb H.-W. 1982. [Voices of European Birds]. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft, München.
5. Bradbury J. W., Vehrencamp S. L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
6. Brenowitz E. A., Beecher M. D. 2005. Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges. Trends Neurosci. 28: 127-132.
7. Catchpole C. K., Slater P. J. B. 1995. Bird Song. Biological themes and variations. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
8. Cramp S. (ed.). 1988. The Birds of Western Palearctic. Vol. V. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
9. Draganoiu T. I. 2002. Directional female preference for an exaggerated trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. P. Roy. Soc. London B 269: 2525-2531.
10. Fandiňo-Mariňo H., Vielliard J. M. E. 2004. Complex communication signals: the case of the Blue-black Grassquit Volatinia jacarina (Aves, Emberizidae) song. Part I - A structural analysis. Ann. Brazilian Acad. Sci. 76: 325-334.
11. Gil D., Gahr M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 133-141.
12. Grzybek J., Michalak I., Osiejuk T. S., Tryjanowski P. 2008. Densities and habitat use of the Tawny Pipit Anthus campestris in wielkopolska region (Poland). Acta Ornithol. in press.
13. Hasselquist D., Bensch S., von Schantz T. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381: 229-232.
14. Kroodsma D. E., Wilda K., Salas V., Murandian R. 2001. Song variation among Cistohorus wrens, with a focus on the Mérida Wren. Condor 103: 855-861.
15. Krüger S. 1989. Der Brachpieper. Ziemsen, Wittenberg.
16. Laiolo P., Tella J. L. 2005. Habitat fragmentation affects culture transmission: patterns of song matching in Dupont's lark. J. App. Ecol. 42: 1183-1193.
17. Mundinger P. C. 1982. Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in the acquired vocalizations of birds. In: Kroodsma D. E., Miller E. H. (eds). Acoustic communication in birds. Vol. II. Academic Press, New York, pp. 147-208.
18. Neuschulz F. 1986. Zum Gesang des männlinchen un weiblichen Brachpiepers Anthus campestris. J. Ornithol. 127: 514-515.
19. Nowicki S., Capranica R. R. 1986. Bilateral syringeal interaction in vocal production of an oscine bird sound. Science 231: 1297-1299.
20. Osiejuk T. S., Łosak K., Dale S. 2007a. Cautious response of inexperienced birds to conventional signal of stronger threat. J. Avian Biol. 38: 644-649
21. Osiejuk T. S., Ratyńska K., Cygan J. P. 2007b. Corn bunting ( Miliaria calandra) males respond differently to alternating and overlapping playback of song. J. Ethol. 25: 159-168.
22. Osiejuk T. S., Ratyńska K., Cygan J. P., Dale S. 2003. Song structure and repertoire variation in ortolan bunting (Emberiza hortulana L.) from isolated Norwegian population. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 40: 3-16.
23. Rexstad E., Burnham K. P. 1991. User's Guide for Interactive Program CAPTURE. Colorado Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
24. Slabbekoorn H., Smith T. B. 2000. Does bill size polymorphism affect courtship song characteristics in the African finch Pyrenestes ostrinus? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71: 737-753.
25. Slater P. J. B. 2003. Fifty years of bird song research: a case study in animal behaviour. Anim. Behav. 65: 633-639.
26. Specht R. 2002. Avisoft-SASLab Pro Sound Analysis and Synthesis Laboratory. A PC-software for MS-Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP. Berlin: Avisoft Bioacoustics, http://www.avisoft.com.
27. Thirion J-M., Lebon P. 2006. [Territory and daily rhythms of male Tawny Pipit Anthus campestris from the Charente-Maritime coastal population]. Alauda 74: 323-330.
28. Voelker G. 2001. Morphological correlates of migratory distance and flight display in the avian genus Anthus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 425-435.
29. White G. C., Burnham K. P., Otis D. L., Anderson D. R. 1978. User's Manual for Program CAPTURE, Utah State Univ. Press, Logan, Utah.