Detecting malicious manipulation in grid environments

Proceedings - Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 28-35

  Martins, Felipe ^a   Maia, Márcio ^a   De Castro Andrade, Rossana M ^a   Dos Santos, Aldri L ^a   De Souza, José Neuman ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRID COMPUTING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MODEL CHECKING; OPTIMIZATION;

HIERARCHICAL DIAGNOSIS MODEL; MALICIOUS NODES; PRIVATE GRIDS;

NETWORK SECURITY;

EID: 38949098653     PISSN: 15506533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SBAC-PAD.2006.16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. I. Foster, C. Kesselman, and S. Tuecke. The anatomy of the grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 15(3):200-222, 2001.
2. F. Martins, M. Maia, R. M. de Castro Andrade, A. Luiz dos Santos, and J. Neuman de Souza. A grid computing diagnosis model for tolerating manipulation attacks. In International Conference on Self-Organization and Autonomous Systems in Computing and Communications (SOAS '2006), Erfurt, Germany, September 2006.
3. V. Welch et al. Security for grid services. In HPDC 2003: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, pages 48-57, 2003.
4. A. Setiawan, D. Adiutama, J. Liman, A. Luther, and R. Buyya. Gridcrypt: High performance symmetric key cryptography using enterprise grids. In PDCAT 2004: Parallel and Distributed Computing - Applications and Technologies, pages 872-877, 2004.
5. S. Song, K. Hwang, and J. Lv. Grid security enforcement with trust integration over minimal vpn tunnels. Technical Report TR 2004-10, USC Internet and Grid Computing Lab, 2004.
6. J. Silva and L. Gaspary. Pegac: Uma arquitetura de controle de acesso baseado em políticas para grades computacionais peer-to-peer. In Workshop of Peer-to-Peer in the 23rd Brazilian Symposium on Computer Networks, pages 37-48, 2005.
7. A. Goldchleger et al. Integrade: object-oriented grid middleware leveraging idle computing power of desktop machines. In Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pages 449-454, 2004.
8. L. F. G. Sarmenta. Sabotage-tolerance mechanisms for volunteer computing systems. In CCGRID 2001: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, pages 337-346, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.
9. S. Zhao, V. Lo, and C. GauthierDickey. Result verification and trust-based scheduling in peer-to-peer grids. In P2P '05: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P '05), pages 31 - 38, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
10. M. Hollick. On the effect of node misbehavior in ad hoc networksv. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2004), volume 6, pages 3759-3763, 2004.
11. E. P. Duarte and A. Brawerman. An isochronous testing strategy for hierarchical distributed system-level diagnosis. J. IEEE Latin American Test Workshop, pages 154-161, 2000.
12. F. Preparata, G. Metze, and R. Chien. On the connection assignment problem of diagnosable systems. IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, 16:848-854, 1968.
13. R. P. Bianchini Jr. and R. W. Buskens. Implementation of on-line distributed system-level diagnosis theory. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 41 (5):616-626, 1992.
14. E. P. Duarte and T. Nanya. A hierarchical adaptive distributed system-level diagnosis algorithm. In IEEE Transactions on Computers, volume 47, pages 34-45, 1998.
15. J. Maeng and M. Malek. A comparison connection assignment for self-diagnosis of multiprocessor systems. In Digest 11th International Symposium Fault Tolerant Computing, pages 173-175, 1981.
16. D. Blough and H. Brown. The broadcast comparison model for on-line fault diagnosis in multiprocessor systems: Theory and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 48(1):470-493, 1999.
17. F. Martins, M. Maia, R. M. de Castro Andrade, A. Luiz dos Santos, and J. Neuman de Souza. Desafios para provisão de integridade de processamento em grades computacionais. In WCGA 2006: Anais do IV Workshop on Computational Grids and Applications in the 24rd Brazilian Symposium on Computer Networks, pages 12-23, Curitiba, Brazil, 2006.
18. A. Sulistio, G. Poduval, R. Buyya, and C. Tham. Constructing a grid simulation with differentiated network service using gridsim. In International Conference on Internet Computing, pages 437-444, 2005.
19. R. Almeida dos Santos, M. F. Aguilar, P. B. Melo de Sousa, J. C. Sousa, and R. M. de Castro Andrade. Antidoping: An approach for grid integrity verification. In AICT/SAPIR/ELETE, pages 2-7, 2005.
20. F. Cornelli, E. Damiani, S. C. di Vimercati, S. Paraboschi, and P. Samarati. Choosing reputable servents in a p2p network. In WWW 2002: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 376-386, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
21. E. Damiani, S. C. di Vimercati, S. Paraboschi, P. Samarati, and F. Violante. A reputation-based approach for choosing reliable resources in peer-to-peer networks. In CCS 2002: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, pages 207-216, 2002.
22. N. Andrade, M. Mowbray, W. Cirne, and F. Brasileiro. When can an autonomous reputation scheme discourage free-riding in a peer-to-peer system? In 4th Workshop on Global and Peer-to-Peer Computing (GP2PC), April 2004.