A logging-based approach for building more robust multi-agent systems

Proceedings - 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2006 Main Conference Proceedings), IAT'06

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 342-349

  Unruh, Amy ^a   Bailey, James ^a   Ramamohanarao, Kotagiri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUST CONTROL;

DOMAINSPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE; LOGGING; SUPPORT AGENT SYSTEM;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 38949091064     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IAT.2006.12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. 3APL group. 3APL BNF specification, http://www. es.uu.nl/3apl/bnf.html.
2. F. Curbera, R. Khalaf, N. Mukhi, S. Tai, and S. Weerawarana. The next step in web services. COMMUNICATIONS OF THEACM, Vol. 46, No. 10, 2003.
3. G. de Giacomo, Y. Lesperance, and H. J. Levesque. ConGolog, a concurrent programming language based on the situation calculus. Artif Intell, 121(1-2):109-169, 2000.
4. M. D'Inverno, M. Luck, M. Georgeff, D. Kinny, and M. Wooldridge. The dmars architecture: A specification of the distributed multi-agent reasoning system. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 9(1 - 2):5-53, 2004.
5. T. Eiter, E. Erdem, and W. Faber. Plan reversals for recovery in execution monitoring. In Non-Monotonic Reasoning, 2004.
6. E. Friedman-Hill. Jess in Action. Manning, 2003.
7. J. Gray and A. Reuter. Transaction Processing: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
8. K. Hindriks, F. d. Boer, W. v. d. Hoek, and J.-J. Meyer. Failure, monitoring and recovery in the agent language 3APL. In AAAI 1998 Fall Symposium on Cognitive Robotics, 1998.
9. K. V. Hindriks, F. S. D. Boer, W. V. der Hoek, and J.-J. C. Meyer. Agent programming in 3APL. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2(4):357-401, 1999.
10. N. Howden, R. Ronnquist, A. Hodgson, and A. Lucas. Jack summary of an agent infrastructure. In 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001.
11. M. Klein, J.-A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, and C. Dellarocas. Using domain-independent exception handling services to enable robust open multi-agent systems Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 7:179-189, 2003.
12. D. Morley and K. Myers. The SPARK agent framework. In AAMAS '04, NY, NY, 2004.
13. K. Nagi, J. Nimis, and P. Lockemann. Transactional support for cooperation in multiagent-based information systems. In Proc. of the Conference on Distributed Information Systems on the basis of Objects, Components and Agents, 2001.
14. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. An abstract architecture for rational agents. In Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 1992.
15. B. v. Riemsdijk, W. v. d. Hoek, and J.-J. C. Meyer. Agent programming in dribble: from beliefs to goals using plans. In AAMAS 2003.
16. F. Souchon, C. Dony, C. Urtado, and S. Vauttier. Improving exception handling in multi-agent systems. In Advances in Software Engineering for MAS. SV LNCS, 2003.
17. A. Unruh, J. Bailey, and K. Ramamohanarao. Managing semantic compensation in a multi-agent system. In The 12th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, 2004. Springer Verlag LNCS.
18. A. Unruh, J. Bailey, and K. Ramamohanarao. A framework for goal-based semantic compensation in agent systems. In 1st International Workshop on Safety and Security in MAS, AAMAS '04. To appear in Springer Verlag LNCS, 2006.
19. A. Unruh, H. Harjadi, J. Bailey, and K. Ramamohanarao. Compensation-based recovery management in multi-agent systems. In Second IEEE Symposium on Multi-Agent Security and Survivability, 2005.
20. M. Winikoff, L. Padgham, J. Harland, and J. Thangarajah. Declarative and procedural goals in intelligent agent systems. In KR2002, 2002.