Whence the autonomy? A response to Harnad and Dror

Pragmatics and Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 587-597

  Kravchenko, Alexander V ^a  

^a BAIKAL STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Behavior; Distributed cognition; Environment; Structural coupling

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949088957     PISSN: 09290907     EISSN: 15699943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/pc.15.3.12kra     Document Type: Note

References (27)

1. Ajjanagadde, V. and Shastri, L. 1991. "Rules and variables in neural nets" Neural Computation 3: 121-134.
2. Bennett, M.R. and Hacker, P.M.S. 2002. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
4. Clark, A. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Cowley, S.J. and Kravchenko, A.V. 2006. "Dinamika kognitivnykh protsessov i nauki o jazyke". Voprosy jazykoznanija 6: 133-141 ["Cognitive dynamics and the language sciences"].
6. Dascal, M. 2006. "Hobbees Challenge". In A. Brook (ed.), The Prehistory of Cognitive Science. Palgrave-McMillan, 67-96.
7. Di Paolo, E. 2005. "Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency". Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 429-452.
8. Fodor, J. A. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Harnad, S. 2005a. "Distributed processes, distributed cognizers, and collaborative cognition". In I.E. Dror (ed.), Cognitive Technologies and the Pragmatics of Cognition: Special issue of Pragmatics & Cognition 13(3): 501-514.
10. Harnad, S. 2005b. "To cognize is to categorize: Cognition is categorizatiod". In H. Cohen and C. Lefebvre (eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 20-42.
11. Harnad, S. and Dror, I. 2006. "Distributed cognition: cognizing, autonomy and the Turing Test". Pragmatics & Cognition 14(2): 209-213.
12. Imoto, S. 2004. "The philosophical nature of Maturana's theory of perceptior". Cybernetics And Human Knowing 11(2):12-20.
13. Järvilehto, T. 1998. "The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory". Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 33: 317-330.
14. Kravchenko, A.V. 2006a. "A bio-cognitive hypothesis for the language/mind relationship". Paper presented at the 22nd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 19-22 June, 2006. Aalborg, Denmark.
15. Kravchenko, A.V. 2006b. "Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps". Language Sciences 28: 51-75.
16. Lamb, S. 1999. Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Linell, P. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Maturana, H.R. 1970. "Biology of cognition". BCL Report 9.0. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
19. Maturana, H.R. 1978. "Biology of language: The epistemology of reality". In G. Miller and E. Lenneberg (eds), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. New York: Academic Press, 28-62.
20. Maturana, H.R., 1988. "Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument". The Irish Journal of Psychology 9: 25-82.
21. Maturana, H., Mpodozis, J. and Letelier, J.C. 1995. "Brain, language, and the origin of human mental functions". Biological Research 28: 15-26.
22. McGee, K. 2005a. "Enactive cognitive science. Part 1: Background and research themes". Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 19-34.
23. McGee, K. 2005b. "Enactive cognitive science. Part 2: Methods, insights, and potential". Constructivist Foundations 1(2): 73-82.
24. Pinker, S. 1995. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: Harper Perennial.
25. Rosch, E., 1999. "Reclaiming concepts". In R. Núñez and W. J. Freeman (eds), Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention, and Emotion. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic, 61-77.
26. Uexkül, J. von, 1909. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tieren. Berlin: J. Springer.
27. Zlatev, J. 2003. "Meaning = life (+ culture): An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meanine". Evolution of Communication 4(2): 253-296.