Cognitive work analysis and design research: Designing for mobile human-technology interaction within elementary classrooms

Proceedings - Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, WMUTE 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 32-35

  Nirula, Latika ^a   Woodruff, Earl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE WORK ANALYSIS; HUMAN-TECHNOLOGY INTERACTION; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ITERATIVE METHODS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 38949083481     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WMTE.2006.261341     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bereiter, C. (2002a). Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bereiter, C. (2002b). Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(3), 321-327.
3. Brown, M. D. (2001). Handhelds in the classroom. Retrieved 20 February, 2004, from http://www.education-world.com/a-tech/tech083.shtml
4. Burns, C. M., & Vicente, K. J. (2000). A participantobserver study of ergonomics in engineering design: How constraints drive design process. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 73-82.
5. Chan, T., Roschelle, J., His, S., Kinshuk, Sharpies, M., Brown, T., et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3-29.
6. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Fidel, R., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2004). From information behaviour research to the design of information systems: The cognitive work analysis framework. Information Research, 10(1), paper 210 [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/101/paper210.html]
8. Naikar, N., Hopcroft, R., & Moylan, A. (2005). Work domain analysis: Theoretical concepts and methodology. DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory, DSTO-TR-1665.
9. Nirula, L., Woodruff, E., Scardamalia, M., & Macdonald, P. (2003). Handhelds in a grade two classroom: Innovations to support knowledge-building and epistemic agency. In K.T. Lee & Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 2003, (Additional pp. 22-26). Hong Kong: ICCE 2003.
10. Pownell, D. & Bailey, G.D. (2000). Are you reading for handhelds? Using a rubric for handheld planning and implementation. Learning and Leading with Technology, 50(2), 50-55.
11. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L.P. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: WileyInterscience.
12. Shin, N., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (in press). Findings from early research on one-to-one handheld uses in K-12. In M. van't Hooft (Ed.), Ubiquitous computing book. Erlbaum.
13. Soloway, E. (2002, December 3). Supporting science inquiry in K-12 using palm computers: a palm manifesto. PdaEd.com. Retrieved 12 December 2002, from http://www.pdaed.com/features/palmmanifesto.xml
14. Vicente, K. (2003). The Human Factor. Toronto: Vintage Canada.
15. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Woodruff, E., Nirula, L. (2005). Design research in the elementary school classroom. In C. Howard, J. Boettcher, L. Justice & K. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Online Learning and Technology, 2 (pp. 510-517). Hershey: Idea Group.