Spray drift measurements to evaluate the Belgian drift mitigation measures in field crops

Crop Protection

Volumn 27, Issue 3-5, 2008, Pages 577-589

  De Schampheleire, M ^a   Baetens, K ^b   Nuyttens, D ^c   Spanoghe, P ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Drift reduction; Grassland; Legislation; Spray application; Spray drift

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROP; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GRASSLAND; MITIGATION; ORCHARD; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION POLICY; SPRAY; SURFACE WATER; WATER POLLUTION;

BELGIUM; BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 38849197530     PISSN: 02612194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anon, 2004. Maatregelen ter beperking van de verontreiniging van oppervlaktewater door gewasbeschermingsmiddelen. Federal Public Service of Public Health, Food Chain Security and Environment, DG Animals, Plants & Food, Service Pesticides and Fertilizers. Brussels, August. p. 12. 〈http://www.fytoweb.fgov.be/NL/doc/driftreducerende%20maatregelen%20voor%20gewasbeschermingsmiddelen.pdf〉.
2. Anon, 2006. Evaluation of new drift-reducing equipments: classification criteria and procedure in Belgium. Federal Public Service of Public Health, Food Chain Security and Environment, DG Animals, Plants & Food, Service Pesticides and Fertilizers. 〈http://www.fytoweb.fgov.be/FR/doc/evaluatie-antidriftmaterialen.pdf〉.
3. BBA, 2007. Offizielles Verzeichnis Verlustmindernde Geräte. 〈http://www.bba.bund.de/cln_044/nn_804440/SharedDocs/10__FA/Publikationen/Pflanzenschutzgeraete/verlustmind/verzeichnisverlustminderndegeraete__pdf.html__nnn=true〉.
4. Bouse L.F., Kirk I.W., and Bode L.E. Effect of spray mixture on droplet size. Trans. ASAE 33 (1990) 783-788
5. Butler Ellis, M.C., Bradley, A., 2002. The influence of formulation on spray drift. Aspects of Applied Biology 66. Int. adv. Pestic. Appl. 251-258.
6. Butler Ellis M.C., and Tuck C.R. How adjuvants influence spray formation with different hydraulic nozzles. Crop Prot. 18 (1999) 101-109
7. Code GLP (Code van goede landbouwpraktijken)-Gewasbescherming, 2007. Brussel, Januari 2007, 148pp. 〈http://www2.vlaanderen.be/ned/sites/landbouw/downloads/dula/code_glp_gewasbescherming.pdf〉.
8. CTB, 2007. Drift reduction measures used in the Dutch authorisation procedure for agrochemicals. 〈http://www.ctb.agro.nl/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/WEBSITE_CTB/BELEID_WET_EN_REGELGEVING/01NATIONALE_WET_EN_REGELGEVING/05BELEIDSREGELS/070403_DRIFTDOPPENLIJST.DOC〉.
9. Decree, 2005. HDJZ/WAT/2005-1983. Staatscourant nr 216, 2 november 2005. Lozingenbesluit open teelt en veehouderij (actualisatie lijst driftarme doppen).
10. De Jong, A., Michielsen, J.M.G.P., Stallinga, H., van De Zande, J.C., 2000. Effect of sprayer boom height on spray drift. Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Universiteit Gent 65/2b, 2000, pp. 919-930.
11. De Schampheleire M., Spanoghe P., Brusselman E., and Sonck S. Risk assessment of pesticide spray drift damage in Belgium. Crop Prot. 26 (2007) 602-611
12. FOCUS, 1997. Surface water models and EU registration of plant protection products. Final Report of the Work of the Regulatory Modelling Working Group on Surface Water Models of FOCUS (24/02/1997).
13. Fytoweb, 2007. 〈http://www.phytoweb.fgov.be〉.
14. Gilbert, A.J., 2000. Local Environmental Risk Assesment for Pesticides (LERAP) in the UK. Aspects of Applied Biology 57. Pestic. Appl. 83-90.
15. Herbst, A., 2003. Pesticide formulation and drift potential. The BCPC Conference, pp. 255-260.
16. Herbst A., Ganzelmeier, H., 2000. Classification of sprayers according to drift risk-a German approach. Aspects of Applied Biology 57. Pestic. Appl. 35-40.
17. Holterman, H.J., van De Zande, J.C., 2003. IMAG Draft Report, IMAG Drift Calculator v1.1 User Manual. 〈http://idc.holsoft.nl〉.
18. ISO/FDIS 22866:2005(E). Equipment for crop protection-methods for field measurement of spray drift.
19. Kaul P., Gebauer S., Neukampf R., and Ganzelmeier H. Modellierung der direkten abtrift von pflanzenschutzmitteln-pflanzenschutzgeräte für flächenkulturen. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd. 48 (1996) 21-31
20. LERAP, 2001. Horizontal boom sprayers: a step-by-step guide to reducing aquatic buffer zones in the arable sector (DEFRA, PSD), 9pp. 〈http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/uploadedfiles/Web_Assets/PSD/LERAP_Horizontal_boom_sprayers(1).pdf〉.
21. Miller P.C.H. Spray drift and its measurement. In: Matthews G.A., and Hislop E.C. (Eds). Application Technology for Crop Protection (1993), E.C., CABI
22. Miller P.C.H., and Butler Ellis M.C. Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers. Crop Prot. 19 (2000) 609-615
23. Miller, P.C.H., Smith, R.W., Tuck, C.R., Walklate, P.J., 1995. The classification of agricultural sprays based on droplet size distribution and the results from wind tunnel tests. Proceedings of Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds, pp. 1125-1134.
24. Nilsson E., and Svensson S.A. Buffer zones when using plant protection products-a Swedish approach. Annual Review of Agricultural Engineering 4 1 (2005) 143-150
25. Nuyttens, D., Sonck, B., De Schampheleire, M., Brusselman, E., Steurbaut, W., Baetens, K, Verboven, P., Nicolaï, B, Ramon, H., 2005. 'Het belang van drift en haar reducerende maatregelen ter bescherming van het milieu in Vlaanderen'. Eindverslag onderzoeksovereenkomst IWT/20424, 218pp.
26. Nuyttens, D., Baetens, K., De Schampheleire, M., Sonck, B., 2006. PDPA Laser-based characterisation of agricultural spray nozzles. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR Ejournal (Manuscript PM 06 024) VIII.
27. Porskamp, H.A.J., van de Zande, J.C., Holterman, H.J., Huijsmans, J.F.M., 1999. Classification of spray nozzles based on driftability. IMAG-DLO Report 99-02. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering. Wageningen, 22pp.
28. PSD, 2007. 〈http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/PSD_Databases/products/spray-fp.cfm〉.
29. Säkert Växtskydd, 2007. Hjälpreda för bestämning av vindanpassat skyddsavstånd vid anvädning av lantbruksspruta med bom. Säkert Växtskydd, Stockholm (in Swedish: A helper to determine wind based buffer zone from boom sprayer). 〈http://www.lrf.se/data/internal/data/11/23/1171352799361/hjalpreda2007.pdf〉.
30. Stallinga, H., Michielsen, J.M.G.P., van De Zande, J.C., 1999. Effect van gewashoogte op de drift bij een bespuiting in een graangewas. IMAG-DLO, note P 99-71, 23pp.
31. Threadgill E.D., and Smith D.B. Effects of physical and meteorological parameters on the drift of controlled-size droplets. Trans ASAE 18 (1975) 51-56
32. van De Zande J.C., Porskamp H.A.J., Michielsen J.M.G.P., Holterman H.J., and Huijsmans J.F.M. Classifications of spray applications for driftability, to protect surface water. Aspects of Applied Biology 57. Pestic. Appl. (2000) 57-65
33. van De Zande, J.C., Michielsen, J.M.G.P., Stallinga, H., Wenneker, M., Heijne, B., 2004. Hedgerow filtration and barrier vegetation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticide Application for Drift Management, pp. 163-181.