Nucleon form factors and hidden symmetry in holographic QCD

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Hong, Deog Ki ^a   Rho, Mannque ^b   Yee, Ho Ung ^c,d   Yi, Piljin ^c  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^b CEA SACLAY   (France)

^c Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

^d ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849187220     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.014030     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. J.J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 981 (1969). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.981
2. D. Schildknecht, Acta Phys. Pol. B APOBBB 0587-4254 37, 595 (2006).
3. M. Gell-Mann and F. Zachariasen, Phys. Rev. 124, 953 (1961). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.124.953
4. N.M. Kroll, T.D. Lee, and B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 157, 1376 (1967). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.157.1376
5. Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 106, 1366 (1957). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.106.1366
6. W.R. Frazer and J. Fulco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 365 (1959). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.365
7. J. Orear, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 0556-2821 18, 2484 (1978). 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.2484
8. R. Petronzio, S. Simula, and G. Ricco, Phys. Rev. D 67, 094004 (2003); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.094004
9. R. Petronzio S. Simula G. Ricco Phys. Rev. D 68, 099901(E) (2003). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.099901
10. F. Iachello, A.D. Jackson, and A. Lande, Phys. Lett. 43B, 191 (1973); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(73)90266-9
11. R. Bijker and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. C 69, 068201 (2004). PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.068201
12. G.E. Brown, M. Rho, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. NUPABL 0375-9474 A454, 669 (1986). 10.1016/0375-9474(86)90112-0
13. D.K. Hong, M. Rho, H.U. Yee, and P. Yi, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 09 (2007) 063. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/063
14. T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113, 843 (2005); PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.113.843
15. T. Sakai S. Sugimoto Prog. Theor. Phys. 114, 1083 (2005). PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.114.1083
16. S. Hong, S. Yoon, and M.J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 04 (2006) 003. 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/04/003
17. H.R. Grigoryan and A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 650, 421 (2007); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.05.044
18. S.J. Brodsky and G.F. de Teramond, arXiv:0707.3859;
19. H.J. Kwee and R.F. Lebed, arXiv:0708.4054.
20. D.K. Hong, M. Rho, H.U. Yee, and P. Yi, Phys. Rev. D 76, 061901 (2007). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.061901
21. See Ref. for a detailed mass spectrum. References discuss bottom-up phenomenological models.
22. In the Skyrme model where only the pion field is present, surrounded by the vector-meson (ρ, ω, etc.) cloud, the extended object, i.e., the skyrmion, plays a crucial role, representing the core in the form factor and cannot be transformed away as is done in the SS model. This is one more indication-in addition to what was argued in -that our instanton baryon in hQCD is basically different from the standard skyrmion made up of the pion field only.
23. This procedure does not involve mesonic loop graphs that bring in higher order corrections in the 1/Nc expansion. It naturally comes in a simple bookkeeping of symmetry for the spin-isospin operators figuring in the Gamow-Teller operator and the isovector magnetic moment operator in electroweak processes as explained in.
24. G. Holzwarth, Z. Phys. A ZPAHEX 0939-7922 356, 339 (1996).
25. C.E. Hyde-Wright and K. de Jager, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. ARPSDF 0163-8998 54, 217 (2004). 10.1146/annurev.nucl.53.041002.110443
26. S. Sasaki and T. Yamazaki, arXiv:0709.3150.
27. It is perhaps worth stressing that all the parameters of the theory to be used to describe baryons are completely fixed in the meson sector. This should be contrasted to what is done in the standard approach to skyrmion physics where the parameters of the chiral Lagrangian figuring in the baryon sector are required to be drastically different from those of the meson sector. For instance, with the Skyrme Lagrangian which has three parameters, Fπ, mπ, and e, if one fixes mπ to the physical value, then the effective pion decay constant needed for the nucleon and the Δ comes out to be much smaller, say 50%, than the experimental value. On the other hand, if one were to use the Skyrme model for describing nuclei-which is a legitimate thing to do-the effective pion mass required comes out to be ∼2 times the physical value in order to have a sensible nuclear structure. Thus the basic strategy of building a large Nc meson Lagrangian to apply to the baryon sector fails badly with chiral Lagrangians without vector-meson degrees of freedom.
28. M. Harada and C. Sasaki, Nucl. Phys. NUPABL 0375-9474 A736, 300 (2004). 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.03.002
29. M. Harada and C. Sasaki, arXiv:0709.3942.
30. Y. Kim, C.H. Lee, and H.U. Yee, arXiv:0707.2637;
31. O. Bergman, G. Lifschytz, and M. Lippert, arXiv:0708.0326;
32. M. Rozali, H.H. Shieh, M. Van Raamsdonk, and J. Wu, arXiv:0708.1322;
33. K.Y. Kim, S.J. Sin, and I. Zahed, arXiv:0708.1469.
34. M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rep. 381, 1 (2003). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00139-X
35. M. Harada, S. Matsuzaki, and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. D 74, 076004 (2006). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.076004
36. M. Rho, arXiv:hep-ph/0703264.
37. D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D 69, 065020 (2004). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.065020
38. M. Harada and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 152001 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.152001
39. N. Horigome and Y. Tanii, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 01 (2007) 072; 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/072
40. S. Nakamura, Y. Seo, S.J. Sin, and K.P. Yogendran, arXiv:hep-th/0611021;
41. S. Kobayashi, D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R.C. Myers, and R.M. Thomson, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 02 (2007) 016. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/02/016
42. M.K. Jones (Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1398 (2000). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1398
43. R.C. Walker, Phys. Rev. D 49, 5671 (1994). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5671
44. H. Hata, T. Sakai, S. Sugimoto, and S. Yamato, arXiv:hep-th/0701280.
45. G.F. de Teramond and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 201601 (2005); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.201601
46. D.K. Hong, T. Inami, and H.U. Yee, Phys. Lett. B 646, 165 (2007); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.030
47. D.K. Hong, H.C. Kim, S. Siwach, and H.U. Yee, J. High Energy Phys. JHEPFG 1029-8479 11 (2007) 036. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/036
48. R.A. Battye, S. Krusch, and P.M. Sutcliffe, Phys. Lett. B 626, 120 (2005). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.097