Effects of implant geometry and surface treatment on osseointegration after functional loading: A dog study

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 229-236

  Chung, S H ^a   Heo, S J ^a   Koak, J Y ^a   Kim, S K ^a   Lee, J B ^a   Han, J S ^a   Han, C H ^b   Rhyu, I C ^a   Lee, S J ^a  

^a BK 21 Plus   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Histomorphometric analysis; Implant geometry; Periodontal analysis; Radiographic analysis; Surface treatment; Thermal oxidation

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; DENTAL CARE; DOG; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTICS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH SOCKET; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DOGS; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERIODONTAL INDEX; TITANIUM; TOOTH SOCKET; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38849169956     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01653.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson H, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981 52 : 155 170.
2. Solar RJ, Pollack SR, Korostoff E. In vitro corrosion testing of titanium surgical implant alloys: an approach to understanding titanium release from implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1979 13 : 217 250.
3. Zitter H, Plenk HJ. The electrochemical behavior of metallic implant materials as indicator of their biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987 21 : 881 896.
4. Tengvall P, Lindström I. Physico-chemical considerations of titanium as a biomaterial. Clin Mater. 1992 9 : 115 134.
5. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Biomaterial and implant surfaces: a surface science approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 3 : 247 259.
6. Sundgren JE, Bodo P, Lundstrom I. Augerelectron spectroscopic studies of the interface between human tissue and implants of titanium and stainless steel. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1986 110 : 9 20.
7. Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Hirsch JM, Thomsen P. Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 48 : 559 568.
8. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong YS, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 13 : 252 259.
9. Desijardins RP. Prostheses design for osseointegrated implants in the edentulous maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 7 : 311 320.
10. Ismail YH, Pahountis LN, Fleming JF. Comparison of two-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant. Int J Oral Implantol. 1987 4 : 25 31.
11. Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ, Chung JP, Rhyu IC. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 29 : 565 574.
12. Heo SJ, Han CH, Chung JP. A three dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of seven implant designs on stress distribution. J Kor Acad Prosthodont. 1997 35 : 609 621.
13. 2 blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 12 : 128 134.
14. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 32 : 448 455.
15. Xiropaidis AV, Qahash M, Lim WH, Shanaman RH, Rohrer MD, Wikesjo UM, Hall J. Bone-implant contact at calcium phosphate-coated and porous titanium oxide (TiUnite)-modified oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 16 : 532 539.
16. Trisi P, Marcato C, Todisco M. Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 23 : 427 437.
17. Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, Wennerberg A, Heo SJ. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 18 : 349 356.
18. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol. 1982 11 : 318 326.
19. Misch CE, Bidez MW, Sharawy MA. Bioengineered implant for a predetermined bone cellular response to loading force. A literature review and case report. J Periodontol. 2001 72 : 1276 1286.
20. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant - a three dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 32 : 279 286.
21. Schulze RK, D'Hoedt B. Mathematical analysis of projection errors in 'paralleling technique' with respect to implant geometry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 12 : 364 371.
22. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Ericsson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thickness and morphology. Biomaterials. 1994 15 : 1062 1074.
23. Novaes AB Jr., Souza SL, de Oliveira PT, Souza AM. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 17 : 377 383.
24. Tinsley D, Watson CJ, Ogden AR. A survey of U.K. centres on implant failures. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 26 : 14 18.