The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's breast cancer patients

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 284-291

  Morris, Eva ^a   Haward, R A ^a,b   Gilthorpe, M S ^a   Craigs, C ^b   Forman, D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b Northern and Yorkshire Clinical Trials and Research Unit   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Calman Hine; Cancer teams; Specialisation; Workload

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; HAZARD RATIO; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 38849168782     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: 15698041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm432     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. http://info.cancerresearchuk-org/cancerstats/breast, Accessed 2006.
2. Berrino F, Sant M, Verdecchia A et al. Survival of cancer patients in Europe. The Eurocare study. Lyon: IARC Scentific Publications 1995 Report No.: No 132.
3. A Report by the Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England apd Wales. A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services (The Calman-Hine Report). London: Department of Health 1995.
4. Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan. A plan for investment. a plan for reform. Department of Health 2000.
5. NHS Executive. Guidance on Commissioning Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes in Breast Cancer - The Manual. Leeds: Department of Health 1996.
6. Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L et al. Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 1995; 945(8960): 1265-1270,
7. Stefoski-Mikeljevic J, Haward RA, Johnston C et al. Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 89(3): 487-491.
8. Hand R, Sener S, Imperato J et al. Hospital variables associated with quality care for breast patents. JAMA 1991; 266: 3429-3432.
9. Raabe NK, Kaaresan R, Fossaa SD. Hospital related differences in breast cancer management. Analysis of an unselected population-based series of 1353 radically operated patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997; 43: 225-235.
10. NHS Executive. Manual of Cancer Service Standards. London: Department of Health 2001.
11. NHS Executive. The Medical Directory. London: Informa Health Care 2001.
12. http://www.specialistinfo.com Accessed 2001.
13. Tu YK, Kellett M, Clerehugh V, Gilthorpe MS. Problems of correlations between explanatory variables in multiple-regression analyses in the dental literature. Br Dent J 2005; 199(7): 457-461.
14. Tu YK, Clerehugh V, Gilthorpe MS. Collinearity in linear regression is a serious problem in cral health research. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 112(5): 389-397.
15. BBC Panorama. The-hospital that failed women. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ programmes/panorama/4866688.stm 27 July 2006, date last accessed.
16. Wright J, Bradley C, Sheldon T, Lifford R Trial by media: Dangers of misinterpretation of medical statisbcs. Lancet 2006; 367: 1139-1140.
17. Breast Surgeons Group of British Association at Surgical Oncology. Guidelines for surgeons in the management of symptomatic breast disease in the UK. Eur J Surg Oncol 1995; 21 (Suppl A): 1-13.
18. Morris J, Royle GT, Taylor I. Changes in the management of early breast cancer in England. J R Soc Med 1989: 82: 12-14.
19. Harries SA, Lawrence RN, Scrivener R, Fieldman NR, Kissin MW. A survey of management of breast cancer in England & Wales. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78: 197-202.
20. McKee MD, Cropp MD, Hyland A et al. Provider case volume and outcome in the evaluation and treatment of patents with mammogram-detected breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 95(4): 704-712.
21. Moritz S, Bates T, Henderson SM et, al. Variation in the management of small invasive breast cancers detected on screening in the former South East Thames region: Observational study. BMJ 1997; 315: 1266-1272.
22. Morris J. Regional variation in the surgical treatment of eady breast cancer. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1312-1313.
23. Janz NK, Wren PA, Copedand LA et al. Patent-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(15): 3091-3098.
24. Du X, Freeman DH, Syblik DA. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980's? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000; 62: 71-79.
25. Stefoski-Mikeljevic J, Haward R, Johnston C et al. Trends in postoperative radiotherapy delay and the effect on survival in breast cancer patients treated with conservation surgery. Br J Cancer 2004, 90: 1343-1348.
26. Commission of Health Improvement amd the Audit Commission. National Service Framework Assessments No. 1 NHS Cancer Care in-England and Wales. Commission for Health Improvement 2001.
27. Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS et al. The impact at the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcome of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patents. Br J Cancer 2006; 95: 979-985.
28. Rouse AM, Jolly K, Stevens AJ, Has Calman-Hine succeeded? Analysis of breast cancer procedure loads per oonsultant firm before ard after the Calman-Hine report. Breast 2000; 10: 55-57.
29. Morris E, Forman D, Haward RA. The Impact of the Calman-Hine Report: analysis of breast and colorectal cancer surgical worldoads and the degree of surgical site specialisation in the Yorkshire region of the UK 1990-2000. Eur J Cancer Care 2006; 16: 150-155.
30. Gillis GR, Hole DJ. Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: A study of 3,786 patents in the west of Scotland. BMJ 1996; 312: 145-148.
31. Skinner KA, Helsper JT, Deapen D et al. Breast cancer: Do specialists make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10(6): 606-615.
32. Selby P, Gillis C, Haward RA. Benefits from specialised cancer care. Lancet 1996; 348: 313-318.
33. Haward RA, Amir Z, Borrill C et al. Breast cancer team: The impact of constitution new cancer worldoad and methods of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Cancer 2003; 89(1): 15-22.
34. Bates T, Evans RGB. Report of the Independent Review commissioned by the Royal College of Radiologists. Brachial plexus neuropathy following radiotherapy for breast carcinoma. London: Royal College of Radiologists 1995.