Food aid donor allocation decisions after 1990

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 27-50

  Young, Linda M ^a   Abbott, Philip C ^b  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849140463     PISSN: 00083976     EISSN: 17447976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00115.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abbott, P. C. and L.M. Young. 2004. Export Competition Issues in the Doha Round. In Agricultural Policy Reform in the WTO: Where Are We Heading? edited by G. Anania, M. E. Bohman, C. A. Carter, and A. F. McCalla, pp. 252 83. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd.
2. Ball, R. and C. Johnson. 1996. Political, economic, and humanitarian motivations for PL 480 food aid: Evidence from Africa. Economic Development and Social Change 44 : 515 37.
3. Barrett, C. 2001 Does food aid stabilize food availability? Economic Development and Cultural Change 49 : 335 49.
4. Barrett, C. 2002. Food Aid and Commercial International Food Trade. Background paper prepared for the Trade and Markets Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, March.
5. Barrett, C. and K. Heisey. 2002. How effectively does multilateral food aid respond to fluctuating needs? Food Policy 27 : 477 91.
6. Barrett, C. and D. G. Maxwell. 2005. Food Aid After Fifty Years: Recasting Its Role. London : Routledge, May.
7. Christensen, C. 1999. The new policy environment for food aid: The challenge of Sub-Saharan Africa. In Policy Reform, Market Stability and Food Security, R. Paarlberg and T. L. Roe. eds. Proceedings of a Conference of the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, University of Minnesota, September.
8. Clay, E., S. Dhiri and C. Benson. 1996. Joint Evaluation of European Union Programmer Food Aid. Synthesis Report, Overseas Development Institute, London, October.
9. D'Ascenzi, A. 2004. Personal communication. World Food Programme, INTERFAIS Group, Rome offices.
10. Diven, P. J. 2001. The domestic determinants of US food aid policy. Food Policy 126 : 455 74.
11. European Commission (EC). 2000. EU Food Aid and Food Security Programme: Towards recipient country ownership of food security. Bi-annual Report 1998-1999, Brussels, April. http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/projects/resal (accessed December 10, 2007).
12. European Commission (EC). 2001. EC Food Aid and Food Security Programme: Food security at the heart of poverty reduction. Bi-annual Report 2000-2001, Brussels. http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/projects/foodsec/documents_en.htm (accessed December 10, 2007).
13. Fisher, F. M. 1963. A theoretical analysis of the impact of food surplus disposal on agricultural production in recipient countries. Journal of Farm Economics 34 : 863 75.
14. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2004a. The State of food insecurity in the world 2004. Rome. http://www.fao.org/ documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/docrep/007/y5650e/y5650e00.htm (accessed December 10, 2007).
15. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2004b. FAOSTAT-Agriculture Database. http://apps.fao.org/page/collections?subset= agriculture (accessed December 10, 2007).
16. Gabbert, S. and H.-P. Weikard. 2000. The poor performance of the rich-bilateral versus multilateral food aid allocation. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 39 : 199 218.
17. Meade, B. 2001. Caloric Content of Various Roots and Tubers by Country. Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
18. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2002. The President's Management Agenda. Executive Office of the President, Washington DC. http://www.whitehouse. gov/omb/budget/fy2002/mgmt.pdf (accessed February 27, 2002).
19. Schultz, T. W. 1960. Impact and implications of foreign surplus disposal on underdeveloped economies: Value to U. S. farm surpluses to underdeveloped countries. Journal of Farm Economics 42 : 1019 30.
20. Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York : Anchor Books.
21. Shapouri, S. and M. Missiaen. 1990. Food aid: Motivation and allocation criteria. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Foreign Agricultural Economic Report Number 240, Washington DC.
22. Shaw, D. J. and E. J. Clay. 1993. World Food Aid: Experiences of Recipients and Donors London : James Currey Ltd. and Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
23. Simon, G. and A. D'Ascenzi. 2001. Personal communications, World Food Programme, INTERFAIS Group, Rome Offices.
24. Stockholm International Peace Institute. 2003. SIPRI Yearbook: Armament, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
25. Talbot, R.B. 1990. The Four World Food Agencies in Rome. Ames : Iowa State University Press.
26. U. S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 1998. U. S. International Food Assistance Report 1997. U. S. Agency for International Development, Washington DC, January 1998 p 32. http://www. dec.org/pdf_docs/ PNACC210.pdf (accessed December 10, 2007).
27. U. S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 2000. U. S. International Food Assistance Report 1999. Washington DC, January 2000 p. 63. http://www.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNACH514.pdf (accessed December 10, 2007).
28. World Food Programme (WFP). 1997. Measures to Enhance WFP's Programming in the Poorest Countries. WFP/EB.3/97/3-A, United Nations, Rome, August 26. http://www.wfp.org/policies/policy/policy/eitem3_a.pdf (accessed April 4, 2001).
29. World Food Programme (WFP). 1999. WFP food aid monitor: Food aid flows, Special Issue. United Nations, Rome, May 2000. http://www.wfp.org.
30. World Food Programme (WFP). 2001. Annual Report of the Executive Director : 2000. WFP/EB. A/2001/3, United Nations, Rome, April 18. http://www.wfp.org/ eb/docs/2001/wfp004659∼1.pdf (accessed December 10, 2007).
31. World Trade Organization (WTO). 2000. Decisions on measures concerning the possible negative effects of the reform programme on least-developed and net-food importing developing countries (NFIDC Decision): Actions taken within the framework of the decision as notified by members. Committee on Agriculture, Special Session, G/AG/NG/S/4, Geneva, April 27.
32. Young, L. M. 2002. Options for World Trade Organization involvement in food aid. Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade 3 : 10 28. http://www. esteyjournal.com/j_pdfs/young3 - 1.pdf (accessed December 10, 2007).
33. Zahariadis, N., R. Travis and J. B. Ward. 2000. U. S. food aid to Sub-Saharan Africa: Politics or philanthropy? Social Science Quarterly 81 : 663 76.