Surgical, anesthetic, perfusion-related advances in minimal access surgery

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 282-287

  Kiaii, Bob ^a,b   Bainbridge, Daniel ^a   Fernandes, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cardiac anesthesia; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; AORTA OCCLUSION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HEART MUSCLE; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT SELECTION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; ROBOTICS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STERNOTOMY; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ANESTHESIA; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 38849119087     PISSN: 10892532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1089253207311160     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Chitwood WR Robot-assisted mitral valve surgery. In: Franco KL, Verrier ED, eds. Advanced Therapy in Cardiac Surgery. Hamilton, On: BC Decker Inc; 2003: 220-229.
2. Falk V., Loulmet D., Wolf RK Procedural Guide. Robotically assisted IMA harvest. Mountain View, CA: da Vinci Intuitive Surgical ; 2001.
3. Ohtuska T., Wolf RK, Hiratzka LF, Wurning P., Flege JB Thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvest for MICABG using the harmonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 ; 63: s107 - s109.
4. Boyd WD, Kiaii B., Novick RJ, et al. RAVECAB: Improving outcome in off-pump/minimal access surgery with robotic assistance and video enhancement. Can J Surg. 2001 ; 44: 45-50.
5. McClure RS, Kiaii B., Novick RJ, et al. Computer-enhanced telemanipulation in mitral valve repair: preliminary experience in Canada with the da Vinci robotic system. Can J Surg. 2006 ; 49: 193-196.
6. Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 ; 129: 1395-1404.
7. Bolotin G., Kypson AP, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr. Robotically-assisted left atrial fibrillation ablation and mitral valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 ; 78: e63 - e64.
8. Pastor MC, Sanchez MJ, Casas MA, Mateu J., Bataller ML Thoracic epidural analgesia in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: seven years' experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 ; 17: 154-159.
9. Ho AM, Chung DC, Joynt GM Neuraxial blockade and hematoma in cardiac surgery: estimating the risk of a rare adverse event that has not (yet) occurred. Chest. 2000 ; 117: 551-555.
10. Ganapathy S., Murkin JM, Boyd DW, Dobkowski W., Morgan J. Continuous percutaneous paravertebral block for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999 ; 13: 594-596.
11. Applebaum RM, Cutler WM, Bhardwaj N., et al. Utility of transesophageal echocardiography during port-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1998 ; 82: 183-188.
12. Applebaum RM, Colvin SB, Galloway AC, et al. The role of transesophageal echocardiography during port- access minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a new challenge for the echocardiographer. Echocardiography. 1999 ; 16: 595-602.
13. Schulze CJ, Wildhirt SM, Boehm DH, et al. Continuous transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) monitoring during port-access cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum. 1999 ; 2: 54-59.
14. Munster K., Anderson U., Mikkelsen J., et al. Vacuum assisted venous drainage (VAVD). Perfusion. 1999 ; 14: 419-423.
15. Wilcox T., Mitchell S., Gorman D. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum- assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 ; 68: 1285-1289.
16. Jones T., Deal D., Vernon J., et al. Does vacuum venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 ; 74: 2132-2137.
17. Cirri S., Negri L., Babbini M., et al. Haemolysis due to active venous drainage during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of two different techniques. Perfusion. 2001 ; 16: 313-318.
18. LaPietra A., Grossi E., Pau B., et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 ; 120: 856-863.
19. Dogan S., Aybek T., Risteski P., et al. Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 ; 79: 492-498.
20. Reichenspurner H., Detter C., Deuse T., et al. Video and robotic- assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a comparison of the port-access and transthoracic clamp techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 ; 79: 485-490.
21. Mohr FW, Falk V., Diegeler A., et al. Minimally invasive port- access mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 ; 115: 567-576.
22. Toomasian J., Peters W., Siegel L., et al. Extracorporeal circulation for port-access cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 1997 ; 12: 83-91.
23. Toomasian J., Williams D., Colvin S., et al. Perfusion during coronary and mitral valve surgery utilizing minimally invasive port-access technology. J Extra-Corporl Technol. 1997 ; 29: 67-72.
24. Woo YJ, Nacke EA Robotic minimally invasive mitral reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay. Surgery. 2006 ; 140: 263-267.